• Accueil
  • > Archives pour le Vendredi 4 novembre 2011

4 novembre 2011

Ancien ambassadeur Christian Graeff : « Quand l’OTAN a-t-elle déjà tué un chef d’État ? »

Classé dans : Politique/Societe — uriniglirimirnaglu @ 6 : 57

sur : http://www.silviacattori.net/article2213.html

ASSASSINAT DU GUIDE MOUAMMAR KADHAFI

Dans le flot des commentaires consensuels évoquant la mort d’un « tyran sanguinaire », une voix libre, soudain, tranche : celle de l’ancien ambassadeur de France Christian Graeff (à Tripoli de 1982 à 1985) interrogé au journal de la radio publique France culture. (*)

20 OCTOBRE 2011 | THÈMES (S.CATTORI) : OTAN LIBYE

France culture : Après une guerre de huit mois, comment qualifiez-vous le rôle des Occidentaux dans la chute du régime Kadhafi ?

Christian Graeff : Mon interrogation ce soir est courte. Quand l’OTAN a-t-elle déjà tué un chef d’État ? Voilà. C’est ma question. Je fouille dans ma mémoire. Je ne trouve pas la réponse. Pour moi, il y a un assassinat politique. Il y a des responsabilités internationales en cause. L’épilogue sera long. Moi, je ne le verrai pas je suis un vieil homme. Mais pour ce dont je puis juger, je suis sûr qu’il y a là matière à œuvre de justice. Parce qu’on a entendu tellement de mensonges. Il y a eu tellement de sophistication dans la médiatisation de la guerre emmenée par l’OTAN en Libye au-delà, bien au-delà – oh combien au-delà – de la résolution 1973 des Nations unies, que les questions sortiront. Personne au monde n’est en état de les étouffer, ni en Europe ni aux États-Unis, encore moins en Israël.

France culture : Vous pensez que les États-Unis, la Grande Bretagne et la France ont envoyé des hommes au sol par exemple ?

Christian Graeff : Ecoutez, sur les détails techniques on en sait beaucoup ; on en sait plus ou moins selon les sources que l’on a. Les miennes de sources, les sources que j’ai, m’autorisent à dire que les interventions armées de l’Alliance, de l’OTAN, ont été considérables. Et les simulacres, n’est-ce pas, la couverture que l’on a cherché misérablement avec le Qatar et d’autres Émirats ou monarchies traditionnelles arabes sont dérisoires. C’est une rigolade.

Vous avez peut-être eu connaissance de l’ouvrage qui vient de sortir il y a quelques jours, de Dumas et Vergès, où ils accusent : « Sarkozy sous BHL » [1]. Voilà. Il y a là, de façon très polémique j’en conviens, mais autant politique que juridique … tout un argumentaire dont la CPI, peut être un jour, aura à connaître…

France culture : Dans le droit fil de ce que vous venez de dire, quelles sont ces questions, incontournables à vos yeux, qu’il va falloir se poser s’agissant du mandat de l’ONU que vous décrivez comme ayant été outrepassé ?

Christian Graeff : Le mandat …c’est très clair. Tout le monde le sait… on a fait une pirouette, on a cru tromper son monde et puis … on ne dupe pas en démocratie les esprits libres. Les esprits serfs c’est autre chose. Les médias sont au centre du débat. Dans ce débat national, dans ce débat culturel, civilisationnel, qui trompe qui ?

(*) Entretien retranscrit presque mot à mot par Silvia Cattori (journal de France culture du 20 octobre à 18h00)


 

[1] Voir : http://livre.fnac.com/a3699392/Roland-Dumas-Sarkozy-sous-BHL

Jean Bricmont : « Ce que Sarkozy, Obama, Cameron veulent, ce n’est pas la démocratie, c’est la soumission »

Classé dans : Politique/Societe — uriniglirimirnaglu @ 6 : 54

sur http://www.silviacattori.net/article2230.html

INTERVENTION DE L’OTAN EN LIBYE

Dès février 2011, la campagne menée par Bernard-Henry Lévy — parallèlement aux allégations mensongères sur le massacre de milliers de personnes à Benghazi répandues par la Libyan League for Human Rights avec l’appui de l’ONGUN-Watch basée à Genève (*) — relayée par les médias du monde entier, a réussi à accréditer dans l’opinion publique l’idée fausse qu’il y avait urgence à intervenir en Libye. Le 17 mars, par 10 voix et 5 abstentions, le Conseil de sécurité approuvait la Résolution 1973 présentée par la France et le Royaume Uni instaurant « un régime d’exclusion aérienne afin de protéger les civils contre des attaques systématiques et généralisées ». Ce fut le début de l’intervention de l’OTAN et d’un massacre de masse toujours en cours.

23 OCTOBRE 2011 | THÈMES (S.CATTORI) : OTAN ONUVIOLATIONS « OCCIDENTALES » DU DROIT INTERNATIONALLIBYE

Jean Bricmont : « Ce que Sarkozy, Obama, Cameron veulent, ce n’est pas la démocratie, c’est la soumission » dans Politique/Societe Libya_and_the_return_texteJean Bricmont

Jean Bricmont fut l’un des rares intellectuels à s’être opposé publiquement à cette intervention. Avant même le vote de la Résolution du Conseil de sécurité, il avertissait : « Les partis de la gauche européenne (inclus les partis « modérés » communistes européens), les « Verts », avec José Bové maintenant allié à un Daniel Cohn-Bendit qui a toujours soutenu les guerres de l’OTAN, différents groupes trotskystes et, bien sûr, Bernard Henry Lévy et Bernard Kouchner, tous appelant à une sorte d’« intervention humanitaire » en Libye, ou accusant la gauche d’Amérique Latine -dont les positions sont bien plus sensées- d’agir comme des « idiots utiles » pour le « Tyran libyen ». (…) Quand vont-ils comprendre qu’on affirme que toutes les guerres sont justifiées pour des raisons humanitaires ? » [1]

Les faits ont malheureusement donné raison à Jean Bricmont. Cette « guerre humanitaire » sous mandat de l’ONU et de son bras armé, l’OTAN, n’aurait jamais dû être acceptée.


Silvia Cattori : La résolution 1973 de l’ONU demande la protection du peuple Libyen [2]. Après six mois de bombardements et de massacres par l’OTAN et ses combattants libyens, on avance le chiffre plausible de dizaines de milliers de morts et de blessés [3]. L’ancien ministre socialiste Hubert Védrine, le 18 mars avait qualifié d’« historique » la résolution sur la Libye. Et encore tout récemment il se réjouissait de la mise en application de la« responsabilité de protéger » et félicitait Nicolas Sarkozy pour son intervention. Selon vous y a-t-il de quoi s’en réjouir ?

Jean Bricmont [4] : Le texte relatif à la « responsabilité de protéger » se limite à protéger les civils. Il ne dit absolument pas qu’il faut faire ce qu’a fait l’OTAN : armer les rebelles, envoyer des troupes spéciales, bombarder des villes. Des civils sont tués. Manifestement l’OTAN ne les protège pas.

Le texte sur la « responsabilité de protéger » dit qu’il faut aider les États à faire respecter les droits de l’homme, mais il a été interprété, contrairement à ce qu’il dit, pour autoriser l’Occident à intervenir où il veut, quand il le veut, sous couvert de « guerre humanitaire », de « droit d’ingérence humanitaire ». Tout cela – qui est basé sur des tonnes de mensonges – est, malgré l’Afghanistan, malgré l’Irak, entièrement légitimé dans l’esprit de l’immense majorité des dirigeants occidentaux et, ce qui est plus désolant, des dirigeants écologistes, de gauche et d’extrême gauche. Et qui souvent demandent maintenant une telle intervention en Syrie.

Silvia Cattori : Vue dans la perspective des guerres récentes -Kossovo, Irak, Afghanistan- la manière dont s’est déroulée cette intervention en Libye n’est-elle pas, plus problématique et lourde de menace que les précédentes interventions ?

Jean Bricmont : Ce qui est inquiétant, c’est le fait que la guerre a été légitimée par l’ONU. Il ne faut jamais oublier que si la Russie était intervenue en Libye à la place de l’OTAN, personne en Occident n’accepterait une telle intervention, et tous ceux qui disent que ce n’est pas une guerre pour le pétrole, diraient que c’est une guerre pour le pétrole, si elle était faite par les Russes.

Il faut se rendre compte qu’on a légitimé uniquement l’ingérence des États-Unis et de leurs alliés. C’est cela qui est préoccupant. Ce qui est curieux c’est que la guerre en Irak, comme celle en Afghanistan, avait d’une certaine façon délégitimé l’ingérence. Mais quand il fallait justifier la guerre en Afghanistan, je me rappelle très bien des arguments avancés. Il fallait libérer les femmes afghanes. Des arguments humanitaires étaient utilisés là aussi. Or, plus personne ne parle aujourd’hui de l’oppression des femmes afghanes. On veut simplement se retirer de l’Afghanistan sans trop de pertes.

La guerre en Libye est préoccupante aussi parce que, à cause de la personnalité très particulière de Kadhafi, ce qu’on peut appeler le Tiers Monde, et d’une façon générale les forces progressistes, sont très divisés au sujet de cette guerre. L’Union africaine par exemple, avait une certaine sympathie pour Kadhafi. L’Amérique latine aussi. La Russie et la Chine voient le concept de souveraineté nationale démoli, n’aiment pas cela, et ils ont raison. Les pays non alignés n’aiment pas cela non plus. Parmi les musulmans, il y a des divisions. Il y a ceux qui se disent qu’avec le CNT ce sera mieux qu’avec Kadhafi. Que ce sera un gouvernement plus démocratique, plus musulman etc. Peut-être…

Silvia Cattori : Nous sommes en plein paradoxe. Voir soudainement des pays arabes et musulmans, comme le Qatar par exemple, apporter leur plein soutien à des puissances qui, depuis 2001, détruisent des pays arabes et musulmans et massacrent leurs peuples, n’est-il pas renversant ?

Jean Bricmont : Un certain nombre de gens détestent Kadhafi. Moi je ne le déteste pas, mais je n’étais pas sous sa coupe et je peux comprendre cette aversion. La même chose se passe avec Bachar el-Assad en Syrie. Donc, il y a des gens qui se disent que tout ira mieux après. Quand on voit ce qui se passe en Irak et en Afghanistan après le renversement de Saddam Hussein et des Talibans on se rend compte que ce n’est pas si simple.

Mais ma position ne porte pas sur la situation en Libye ou en Syrie, mais sur la politique de l’OTAN, qui entend probablement contrôler les révolutions arabes en les « aidant » ; pendant longtemps ils ont soutenu les autocraties, maintenant ils se rendent compte que ce n’est pas possible ; ils attaquent alors le régime qu’ils détestent le plus, à savoir Kadhafi ; et, en soutenant l’opposition sous prétexte de défendre la démocratie, ils espèrent sans doute la contrôler. Du point de vue des gens qui soutiennent le CNT, sans être favorable à l’OTAN (un certain nombre de musulmans par exemple), c’est un jeu de dupes. Eux espèrent utiliser l’OTAN à leurs fins pour arriver au pouvoir et puis dire à l’OTAN, rentrez chez vous. Cela risque de ne pas être évident.

Silvia Cattori : Les conflits entre l’OTAN et les forces regroupées au sein du CNT sont-ils inéluctables ?

Jean Bricmont : Je n’en sais rien. Lors de la chute de l’Union soviétique, tout le monde a applaudi en Occident. D’abord il y eut Eltsine, qui était complètement pro-occidental et c’était donc parfait. Puis Poutine est arrivé avec un agenda plus nationaliste et, subitement la Russie a commencé à déplaire aux Occidentaux.

Ce que les Occidentaux veulent, ce n’est pas la démocratie, c’est la soumission. Ils ont soutenu des régimes affreux tant qu’ils étaient soumis. Maintenant que certains de ces dirigeants ne sont plus défendables, ils s’attaquent à ceux qui leur sont les moins favorables (Libye, Syrie, Iran) et ils espèrent que la « démocratie » va amener la soumission. Mais cela est douteux. Les intérêts nationaux et les différences religieuses ou idéologiques existent, indépendamment des régimes. Même si la Libye était une démocratie parfaite, je ne pense pas qu’elle aurait envie de reconnaître Israël. Mais je doute que BHL (Bernard-Henri Lévy) par exemple, avait envie de mettre au pouvoir des gens hostiles à Israël.

Il ne faut pas oublier que les gens contrôlent rarement toutes les conséquences de leurs actions.

Silvia Cattori : Bernard-Henri Lévy, a joué un rôle clé, avec le président Sarkozy, en faveur de cette guerre. N’a-t-il pas réussi, par son argumentaire faussement humanitaire à semer confusion et division au sein du camp progressiste, paralysant ainsi toute velléité de protestation ?

Jean Bricmont : Du point de vue de BHL, le grand avantage c’est d’être arrivé à une terrible division des forces progressistes. Les gens vont continuer de se disputer au sujet de cette guerre. Notez que l’on a vu la même chose lors de la première guerre mondiale. Certains disaient : on ne peut pas s’allier avec la Russie tsariste. D’autres disaient : il faut tout faire pour abattre le militarisme allemand. Il est important d’élaborer une réflexion cohérente sur ces sujets. Mais ce n’est pas facile.

Des pays voisins de la Libye – dont des ressortissants, accusés d’être des mercenaires de Kadhafi, ont été tués par les rebelles libyens – n’aiment pas ce qui se passe en Libye. Il y a des armes qui circulent, tout cela préoccupe les pays du Maghreb et déstabilise la région. Le fait que la transition a été violente – et non pas négociée – est une bénédiction pour les gens qui veulent voir le chaos s’installer dans cette région. Qu’ils l’aient fait exprès ou pas, je n’en sais rien. Mais c’est une bénédiction pour le militarisme occidental. Presque tous les pays non occidentaux voulaient une solution négociée à ce conflit. Mais les Occidentaux ne veulent jamais de solution négociée ; quand ils sont dans une position de force ils y vont à fond. Le jour où la Chine sera plus forte que nous et qu’elle pourra utiliser la force, on verra les choses autrement. Mais, pour le moment, on se sent plus fort et, dès qu’il y a un conflit, on veut toujours une solution militaire, jouer sur la force, jouer sur la technologie, c’est d’ailleurs la seule chose qui nous reste. Dans le domaine du commerce, les Chinois sont bien plus forts que nous.

C’est à la question du militarisme que les progressistes devraient réfléchir. Mais ils ne le font pas. Ils encouragent ce militarisme au nom de l’« ingérence humanitaire ». Si, demain, on doublait le budget militaire en France, Madame Joly, qui est écologiste, s’y opposerait sans doute ; mais, alors qu’elle ne veut pas voir de troupes françaises défiler sur les Champs Elysées le 14 juillet, elle accepterait des troupes françaises en Libye [5] ! C’est incohérent, parce que les guerres humanitaires sont des guerres à zéro mort (de notre côté), qui nécessitent un appareil militaire de haute technologie, lequel coûte cher.

Cet appareil est essentiellement celui des États-Unis, mais là il y a des gens qui dorment dans leur voiture parce qu’ils ont perdu leur maison reprise par les banques, et l’État consacre une fortune aux dépenses militaires. Sans les appareils de surveillance des États-Unis et ses possibilités d’approvisionnement des avions de l’OTAN, cette guerre aurait été beaucoup plus difficile à mener.

Si on s’oppose au militarisme, particulièrement aux États-Unis, on s’oppose aussi aux interventions humanitaires, parce que sans l’appareil militaire américain, on n’aurait tout simplement plus les moyens de mener ces interventions.

L’immense majorité des pays du monde, même ceux qui ont une armée importante (Russie, Chine, Inde etc.) considèrent que la mission de leur armée est de protéger leurs frontières, pas d’envoyer des troupes un peu partout protéger les droits de l’homme. Notez que c’est aussi la position de la Suisse. Tout ce que je demande, c’est que les autres états occidentaux adoptent la position de la Suisse. Ce n’est ni révolutionnaire ni radical.

Silvia Cattori : Tout porte à croire que BHL ne va pas s’arrêter là. Qu’il va relancer sa campagne en soutien aux opposants au régime de Bachar el-Assad. Pour Israël qui occupe depuis 1967 illégalement le Golan syrien -un véritable réservoir d’eau pour la région- et n’entend pas le céder, la Syrie est un enjeu stratégique important. La chute d’Assad -mis par Tel Aviv sur la liste des dirigeants qui restent à abattre- serait tout bénéfice pour Israël. Va-t-on vers un scénario libyen ?

Jean Bricmont : Si vous regardez comment les choses se sont passées en Libye, ces Libyens que l’on disait si hostiles à Kadhafi, son gouvernement que l’on disait si faible et si détesté, etc. a résisté plus longtemps que Milosevic lors de l’intervention de l’OTAN en 1999, plus longtemps que les Talibans en 2001 à Kaboul, et plus longtemps que le régime de Saddam en 2003.

Face à une opposition appuyée par l’ensemble de toutes les forces occidentales je trouve cette résistance plutôt étonnante. Je croyais, comme Obama, que cela se terminerait en quelques jours. Que cela allait s’effondrer très vite.

Donc, je ne suis pas sûr que les analystes militaires, du moins ceux qui sont lucides -par opposition aux idéologues, comme notre gauche « humanitaire »- aient envie de répéter cette expérience en plus grand, en Syrie ou en Iran.

Ce que je trouve comique, par contre, c’est de voir qu’il y a une extrême-gauche qui ne « vit » littéralement que de l’exploitation de la mauvaise conscience coloniale, qui agite sans arrêt l’anticolonialisme et l’antiracisme, et puis, pendant la guerre en Libye, dit qu’il faut accepter l’intervention de l’OTAN pour soutenir les rebelles. Ils oublient que, lors des conquêtes coloniales, les mêmes justifications humanitaires étaient utilisées : combattre l’esclavage, renverser des satrapes ou des monarques absolus etc.

Il y a là quelque chose d’absurde. Il faut savoir dans quel monde on veut vivre. Veut-on vivre dans un monde où nous allons, nous, imposer des gouvernements un peu partout ?

Je pense que ce monde est fini. Que le colonialisme est terminé. L’Occident n’a plus les moyens des politiques impériales qu’il avait dans le passé. Et si la gauche occidentale devait être utile à quelque chose, ce serait à penser comment nous adapter à notre déclin inévitable, plutôt que d’inventer des justifications humanitaires aux derniers scintillements de l’empire américain.

Silvia Cattori : Je vous remercie.

Entretien réalisé le 13 septembre 2011.

Silvia Cattori

(*) Voir : « Urgent Appeal to Stop Atrocities in Libya, Sent by 70 NGOs to the US, EU, and UN », UN Watch, 21 février 2011. (L’ONG UN Watch est réputée pour servir les intérêts d’Israël) 
Voir également : « Libya and the big lie : Using human rights organizations to launch wars », par Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya, 25 septembre 2011.

Sur la « responsabilité de protéger », voir aussi : 
« La “responsabilité de protéger” : une façade légale pour légitimer l’ingérence ? – Entretien avec Jean Bricmont » , par Silvia Cattori, 24 septembre 2009.


 

[1] Voir : « La Libye, la gauche européenne et le retour de l’impérialisme humanitaire », par Jean Bricmont, Le Grand Soir, 12 mars 2011.

[2] Voir le texte de cette résolution : 
http://www.un.org/News/fr-press/docs/2011/CS10200.doc.htm

[3] Cet entretien a été réalisé le 13 septembre 2011

[4] Figure du mouvement anti-impérialiste, Jean Bricmont est professeur de physique théorique à l’Université de Louvain (Belgique). Il a publié « Impérialisme humanitaire. Droits de l’homme, droit d’ingérence, droit du plus fort ? » (Éditions Aden, 2005).

[5] Voir :http://www.marianne2.fr/Eva-Joly-veut-des-chars-en-Libye-pas-sur-les-Champs-Elysees_a208455.html. Elle appuyait « à 100% » l’opération et estimait qu’il est « difficile de mener une guerre sans troupes »

LA PETITE VILLE DE SYRTE CRUELLEMENT ASSIÉGÉE

Classé dans : Politique/Societe — uriniglirimirnaglu @ 6 : 52

Une population pilonnée et affamée dans une ville en ruines

Où sont passés les valeureux « défenseurs des droits Humains » ? Les signataires (*) notamment de « l’appel urgent pour arrêter les atrocités en Libye », du 21 février 2011, concocté par l’ONG pro israélienne UN- Watch ? Un appel qui devait faire entrer la prétendue « communauté internationale » en guerre contre un peuple qui ne la voulait pas.

15 OCTOBRE 2011 | THÈMES (S.CATTORI) : OTAN LIBYE

LA PETITE VILLE DE SYRTE CRUELLEMENT ASSIÉGÉE dans Politique/Societe Syrte_detruite_texte_1

La petite ville de Syrte dévastée par les assauts des forces du Conseil national de transition et les bombardements de l’OTAN.

Syrte_detruite_texte_2 dans Politique/Societe

Aucun dirigeant occidental n’a condamné ni même évoqué publiquement le sort atroce des habitants de Syrte assiégés, privés d’eau, d’électricité, de nourriture, de soins, depuis plus de quatres semaines. Pourquoi les signataires de l’appel (*) à intervenir de manière urgente en Libye en février, restent-ils aujourd’hui muets ?


(*) Signataires de la lettre urgente pour demander d’intervenir en Libye 
12 février 2011 – Genève – Suisse

1. Hillel C. Neuer, United Nations Watch, Switzerland 
2. Dr. Sliman Bouchuiguir, Libyan League for Human Rights, Switzerland 
3. Mary Kay Stratis, Victims of Pan Am Flight 103, Inc., USA 
4. Carl Gershman, President, The National Endowment for Democracy, USA 
5. Yang Jianli, Initiatives for China, USA – Former prisoner of conscience and survivor of Tiananmen Square massacre 
6. Yang Kuanxing, YIbao – Chinese writer, original signatory to Charter 08, the manifesto calling for political reform in China 
7. Matteo Mecacci, MP, Nonviolent Radical Party, Italy 
8. Frank Donaghue, Physicians for Human Rights, USA 
9. Nazanin Afshin-Jam, Stop Child Executions, Canada 
10. Bhawani Shanker Kusum, Gram Bharati Samiti, India 
11. G. Jasper Cummeh, III, Actions for Genuine Democratic Alternatives, Liberia 
12. Michel Monod, International Fellowship of Reconciliation, Switzerland 
13. Esohe Aghatise, Associazione Iroko Onlus, Italy 
14. Harris O. Schoenberg, UN Reform Advocates, USA 
15. Myrna Lachenal, World Federation for Mental Health, Switzerland 
16. Nguyên Lê Nhân Quyên, Vietnamese League for Human Rights, Switzerland 
17. Sylvia G. Iriondo, Mothers and Women against Repression (M.A.R. Por Cuba), USA 
18. David Littman, World Union for Progressive Judaism, Switzerland 
19. Barrister Festus Okoye, Human Rights Monitor, Nigeria 
20. Theodor Rathgeber, Forum Human Rights, Germany 
21. Derik Uya Alfred, Kwoto Cultural Center, Juba – Southern Sudan 
22. Carlos E Tinoco, Consorcio Desarrollo y Justicia, A.C., Venezuela 
23. Abdurashid Abdulle Abikar, Center for Youth and Democracy, Somalia 
24. Dr. Vanee Meisinger, Pan Pacific and South East Asia Women’s Association, Thailand 
25. Simone Abel, René Cassin, United Kingdom 
26. Dr. Francois Ullmann, Ingenieurs du Monde, Switzerland 
27. Sr Catherine Waters, Catholic International Education Office, USA 
28. Gibreil Hamid, Darfur Peace and Development Centre, Switzerland 
29. Nino Sergi, INTERSOS – Humanitarian Aid Organization, Italy 
30. Daniel Feng, Foundation for China in the 21st Century 
31. Ann Buwalda, Executive Director, Jubilee Campaign, USA
32. Leo Igwe, Nigerian Humanist Movement, Nigeria 
33. Chandika Gautam, Nepal International Consumers Union, Nepal 
34. Zohra Yusuf, Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, Pakistan 
35. Sekou Doumbia, Femmes & Droits Humains, Mali 
36. Cyrille Rolande Bechon, Nouveaux Droits de l’Homme, Cameroon 
37. Zainab Al-Suwaij, American Islamic Congress, USA 
38. Valnora Edwin, Campaign for Good Governance, Sierra Leone 
39. Patrick Mpedzisi, African Democracy Forum, South Africa
40. Phil ya Nangoloh, NamRights, Namibia 
41. Jaime Vintimilla, Centro Sobre Derecho y Sociedad (CIDES), Ecuador 
42. Tilder Kumichii Ndichia, Gender Empowerment and Development, Cameroon 
43. Amina Bouayach, Moroccan Organisation for Human Rights, Morocco 
44. Abdullahi Mohamoud Nur, CEPID-Horn Africa, Somalia 
45. Delly Mawazo Sesete, Resarch Center on Environment, Democracy & Human Rights, DR Congo 
46. Joseph Rahall, Green Scenery, Sierra Leone 
47. Arnold Djuma, Solidarité pour la Promotion Sociale et la Paix, Rwanda 
48. Panayote Dimitras, Greek Helsinki Monitor, Greece 
49. Carlos E. Ponce, Latina American and Caribbean Network for Democracy, Venezuela 
50. Fr. Paul Lansu, Pax Christi International, Belgium 
51. Tharsika Pakeerathan, Swiss Council of Eelam Tamils, Switzerland 
52. Ibrahima Niang, Commission des Droits Humains du Mouvement Citoyen, Senegal _53. Virginia Swain, Center for Global Community and World Law, USA 
54. Dr Yael Danieli, International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, USA 
55. Savita Gokhale, Loksadhana, India 
56. Hasan Dheeree, Biland Awdal Organization, Somalia 
57. Pacifique Nininahazwe, Forum pour le Renforcement de la Société Civile, Burundi 
58. Derik Uya Alfred, Kwoto Cultural Center, Southern Sudan 
59. Michel Golubnichy, International Association of Peace Foundations, Russia 
60. Edward Ladu Terso, Multi Media Training Center, Sudan 
61. Hafiz Mohammed, Justice Africa Sudan, Sudan 
62. Sammy Eppel, B’nai B’rith Human Rights Commission, Venezuela 
63. Jack Jeffery, International Humanist and Ethical Union, United Kingdom 
64. Duy Hoang, Viet Tan, Vietnam 
65. Promotion de la Democratie et Protection des Droits Humains, DR Congo 
66. Radwan A. Masmoudi, Center for the Study of Islam & Democracy, USA 
67. María José Zamora Solórzano, Movimiento por Nicaragua, Nicaragua 
68. John Suarez, Cuban Democratic Directorate, USA 
69. Mohamed Abdul Malek, Libya Watch, United Kingdom 
70. Journalists Union of Russia, Russia 
71. Sindi Medar-Gould, BAOBAB for Women’s Human Rights, Nigeria 
72. Derik Uya Alfred, Kwoto Cultural Centre, Sudan 
73. Sr. Anne Shaym, Presentation Sisters, Australia 
74. Joseph Rahad, Green Scenery, Sierra Leone 
75. Fahma Yusuf Essa, Women in Journalism Association, Somalia 
76. Hayder Ibrahim Ali, Sudanese Studies Center, Sudan 
77. Marcel Claude Kabongo, Good Governance and Human Rights NGO, DR Congo 
78. Frank Weston, International Multiracial Shared Cultural Organization (IMSCO), USA 
79. Fatima Alaoui, Maghrebin Forum for environment and development, Morocco 
80. Ted Brooks, Committee for Peace and Development Advocacy, Liberia 
81. Felly Fwamba, Cerveau Chrétien, DR Congo 
82. Jane Rutledge, CIVICUS : World Alliance of Citizen Participation, South Africa 
83. Ali AlAhmed, The Institute for Gulf Affairs, USA 
84. Daniel Ozoukou, Martin Luther King Center for Peace and Social Justice, Cote d’Ivoire 
85. Dan T. Saryee, Liberia Democratic Institute (LDI), Liberia

Individu 
Dr. Frene Ginwala, former Speaker of the South African National Assembly 
Philosopher Francis Fukuyama 
Mohamed Eljahmi, Libyan human rights activist 
Glenn P. Johnson, Jr., Treasurer, Victims of Pan Am Flight 103, Inc., father of Beth Ann Johnson, victim of Lockerbie bombing

(*) Source : United Nations Watch et al., “Urgent Appeal to Stop Atrocities in Libya : 
Sent by 70 NGOs to the US, EU, and UN”, 21 feb 2011 : 
http://www.unwatch.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx ?c=bdKKISNqEmG&b=1330815&ct=9135143

Obama’s « Attack Libya » Speech Mar 29, 2011

Classé dans : Politique/Societe — uriniglirimirnaglu @ 6 : 45

sur : http://www.afterenlightenment.net/obama.htm

A Study in Mind Control by Ray Songtree

Transcript of Speech

The Libya Speech by President Obama on Mar 29, 2011 was a mind control tool to hypnotize Americans into believing that crime is justice. He will change the English language so that fair is crooked and crooked is fair. He will again and again propagandize the listener with the following programming…

1. Heroic troops should feel proud no matter what they are told to do.

2. USA has « world community » support (lie will be repeated 27 times). We can examine if this is the fact.

3. Gaddafi is bad man who committed atrocities against civilians (framing and slander will be repeated 34 times). We can find out if this is true.

4. USA is Savior that protects innocent people.(will be repeated 32 times) . We can review what is actually happening.

5. The infamous hope mantra from Obama 2008 campaign. (9 times)

« Good evening. Tonight, I’d like to update the American people on the international [fake coalition, start count 1] effort that we have led in Libya – what we have done, what we plan to do, and why this matters to us. [As the story unfolds, it becomes increasingly difficult to identify 'us'?]

I want to begin by paying tribute to our men and women in uniform [He will repeat this as mind control method...In fact all of his speeches have this programming as have past presidents. It is ongoing mind programming.] who, once again, have acted with courage, professionalism and patriotism. They have moved with incredible speed and strength. [The military acted with speed in 2003 where no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq. Should we assume their action now is more justified?] Because of them and our dedicated diplomats, a coalition [2nd] has been forged and countless lives have been saved. [the great Savior 1st] Meanwhile, as we speak, our troops are supporting our ally Japan, [See Fukushima HAARP attack on HAARP Page ] leaving Iraq to its people [See Veterans Page ], stopping the Taliban’s momentum in Afghanistan…

 

Early in 2008, the Atlantic Council released a report over the signature of its chairman, retired U.S. Marine Gen. James L. Jones that began,

« Make no mistake: NATO is not winning in Afghanistan….  » If that report were released in summer 2010, it could easily read: « Make no mistake: we are losing in Afghanistan…  »

After a firestorm of protest from Brussels,

the word « NATO » was changed to « the international community. »

and going after al Queda around the globe. [There never was an al Queda.Radical Islamists were funded by CIA to create an ‘enemy’ to justify ‘war on terror’ so USA would have excuse for world wide aggression.] As Commander-in-Chief, [Savior 2] I am grateful to our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, Coast Guardsmen, and their families, as are all Americans. [Heroes 2] 

For generations, the United States of America has played a unique role as an anchor of global security [obey or else] and advocate for human freedom[where?]. Mindful of the risks and costs of military action, we are naturally reluctant to use force to solve the world’s many challenges [but US starts wars more than any other country so is US reluctant?  How does force solve challenges?]. But when our interests [$] and values [me first] are at stake, we have a responsibility to act. That is what happened in Libya over the course of these last six weeks. [Obama started a war without Congressional approval.  This is what happened. But General Wesley Clark says it was already awritten plan in 2001, so the Libya war plan was developed even before that.

 

 

Therefore, Bush and Obama are just puppets of something much bigger that spans administrations. One thread is the Council of Foreign Relations, a heavily funded Rockefeller think tank. See Rockefeller quote middle of Home Page.

Below we listen to Obama’s Secretary of State HIllary Clinton describe the relationship between the Dept of State of the United States, and this privately funded organization CFR.

 


that had been choking off towns and cities and we cut off much of their source of supply.
 [whose supply? The roads that feed the general populace of Libya?] And tonight, I can report that we have stopped [savior 13] Gaddafi’s deadly advance. [smear 17 He has made Gaddafi sound like an invader in his own land, double speak. And as the following months after this March Speech showed, Obama did not stop the legitimate Government of Libya until 8000 sorties had destroyed country.]


In this effort, the United States has not acted alone.
 [He just said it was his decision]  Instead, we have been joined [USA wasn’t joined by anyone, it already funds and directs NATO] by a strong and growing coalition. [fake coalition 8] This includes our closest allies – nations like France, UK Canada Denmark, Norway, Italy, Spain, Greece, and Turkey– all of whom have fought by our side for decades. [Its called NATO. This is the big « international coalition » who helps USA invade countries like Iraq and Afghanistan for share of spoils] And it includes Arab partners like Qatar and the United Arab Emerates, who have chosen to meet their responsibility [their responsibility as tiny minions to go along with Empire] to defend [savior 13] the Libyan people. [In double talk, defend means attack] 

To summarize, then: in just one month, the United States has worked with our international partners 
[NATO, fake coalition 8] to mobilize a broad coalition [ It's called NATO. Fake coalition 9. So the international partners mobilized international partners], secure [push through UN] an international[fake coalition 10] mandate [It was no mandate, because China, Russia, Brazil, India and Germany abstained. These countries themselves have 50% of world population, and then we can add all of Africa. Why there was no veto will need to be examined in the coming Crimes against Humanity Trials] to protect [savior 14]civilians, stop an advancing army [smear 18 advancing in their own country?] , prevent a massacre [smear 19], and establish a No Fly Zone with our allies[NATO] and partners [NATO. Fake coalition 11 What partners are not NATO that could establish a No Fly Zone?].

« Putin said NATO went beyond the UN’s March 16th mandate when it dropped guided missiles on Gaddafi’s government offices in Tripoli. “What kind of no-fly zone is this if they are striking palaces every night?” Putin said in Ria Novosti. “What do they need to bomb palaces for? To drive out the mice?” Putin even went as far as suggesting that Libya’s oil resources were a main object for NATO’s interest in Libya. » [went as far in suggesting?]

UK to expel five Libyan diplomats March 30th, 2011 LONDON (BNO NEWS) — British Foreign Secretary William Hague on Wednesday announced that the United Kingdom (UK) will be expelling five Libyan diplomats, who “pose a threat to our security.”

May 1, 2011 Britain announced Sunday it would expel Libya’s ambassador after the UK’s embassy was attacked in Tripoli. The attacks came just hours after a NATO airstrike killed Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi’s youngest son late on Saturday.

SAS troopers help co-ordinate rebel attacks in Libya

The Guardian has learned that a number of serving British special forces soldiers, as well as former SAS troopers, are advising and training rebel forces, although their presence is officially denied.

The Guardian has previously reported the presence of former British special forces troops, now employed by private security companies and funded by a number of sources, including Qatar. They have been joined by a number of serving SAS soldiers.


Our most effective alliance, NATO, has taken command of the enforcement of the arms embargo and No Fly Zone. 
[So Americans, don't worry about this anymore, it is in someone else's hands.] [and food embargo?] Last night, NATO decided to take on the additional responsibility of protecting [savior 17 strangling] Libyan civilians. [He means the mercenaries, because the water system and power of the civilians was taken out by bombing, so NATO has no interest in protecting civilians]

US Led NATO Bombs Water Facilities in Libya

Posted on July 25, 2011 by Rick Bronson

New reports coming out of Libya depict a NATO move towards genocide.  Libya is in a desert and the US led NATO is now bombing not only water facilities, but factories that produce water pipesneeded to replace those destroyed by the bombs.  4.5 million Libyans are facing the prospect of having no drinking water .  And remember these bombings are supposedly being conducted as a form of humanitarian aid designed to save the lives of innocents.

This transfer from the United States to NATO will take place on Wednesday. Going forward, the lead in enforcing the No Fly Zone [this is now double speak term for nightly bombing of ground targets and use of drones]and protecting [savior 18] civilians on the ground will transition to our allies and partners [fake coalition 14. He means our European minions] , and I [savior 19] am fully confident that our [possessive pronoun] coalition [fake coalition 15] will keep the pressure on Gaddafi’s remaining [would that be the armed civilians? The freedom fighters who will be called Gaddafi loyalists.] forces. In that effort, the United States will play a supporting role – including intelligence [managing everything], logistical support [transporting everything],search and rescue assistance [for our CIA and NATO assets], and capabilities to jam regime communications. [Destroy communication for citizens of Libya] Because of this transition to a broader, NATO-based coalition [fake coalition 16. It is called NATO], the risk and cost of this operation – to our military, and to American taxpayers – will be reduced significantly. [Americas are getting a bargain! And how much has it cost so far Mr. President?]

Libya war costs US taxpayers $2m a day and still no Gaddafi Jun 9, 2011 – According to an internal DOD memo, the U.S. had already spent $664 million in Libya – a running cost of $60 million a month by mid-May …

Los Angeles Times article says $9.4 million per day.

But, not to worry. Before Obama’s War, Libya produced 1.6 million barrels/day oil. And US recently stole $33-37 billion from Libya and there will be no one to oversee what USA does with this money, just like no one oversees FED or Pentagon. In fact, these billions are real money, not paper money which props up USA at this time. USA is also especially interested in seizing Libya’s gold. « The reserves are substantial, ranking in the global top 25, according to International Monetary Fund (IMF) data.

(CNN) July 26, 2011 — International oil companies

are jockeying for advantage in the new Libya, buoyed by news that damage to the energy infrastructure appears to be slight.[So, 'the people's oil which was the people's will now be up for grabs, just like Iraq, and the people won't get it. The looting is not even masked.]

Obama's

 

We will safeguard [maybe Bernanke can help with this] the more than $33 billion that was frozen [stolen] from the Gaddafi regime so that it is available to rebuild Libya. [The money will go to Western contractors like Halliburton, just as happened in Iraq. See Shock Doctrine Disaster Capitalism, Naomi Klien onthe Womens Page .]

U.N. to allow release of $1.5 billion frozen Libya funds (Reuters)Aug 25, 2011 The United States and South Africa struck a deal on Thursday to allow the release of $1.5 billion in frozen Libya funds for humanitarian aid and other civilian needs, U.N. diplomats said on Thursday.

NATO nations set to reap spoils of Libya War

Aug 25, 2011 Rachel Shabi

It looks like the more telling news on Libya has migrated to the business pages.  With jubilant reporting of Gaddafi’s imminent downfall seizing headlines, it’s the financial pages that have the clinical analysis. So, for instance, it is in this section that the Independent reports a «  dash for profit in the post-war Libya carve up « .

Similarly, Reuters, under the headline, «  Investors eye promise, pitfalls in post-Gaddafi Libya « noted that a new government in that country could « herald a bonanza for Western companies and investors ».

Before Tripoli has completely fallen, before Gaddafi and his supporters have stepped down and before the blood dries on the bodies that have yet to be counted, Western powers are already eyeing up what they view us just rewards for the intervention.

There are no more illusions over how far NATO forces exceeded the UN security resolution that mandated its campaign. For months, NATO officials insisted it was operating within brief - an air campaign, designed to protect civilians under threat of attack. But now it is described as an « open secret » that NATO countries were operating undercover, on the ground…

… As alluded to by the Economist , each country’s contribution to the NATO effort in Libya is expected to have some impact on how much of the spoils it gets in the looming post-war period.  

After all, this money does not belong to Gaddafi [smear 21] or to us [he considered this? Absolutely, as the entire operation is a robbery] – it belongs to the Libyan people, and we will make sure they receive it. [savior 21 Gaddafi is hugely respected in Africa. He never owned the 33 billion that USA stole. So how noble that USA will destroy the country and use the peoples' money to do whatever USA wants to be done with it, and how noble of NATO countries to be slobbering over the oil and business contracts they worked so hard for, to 'save the people'.] 

Tomorrow, Secretary Clinton will go to London,

At the said meeting a reporter asks Clinton about « who are we supporting in Libya? » Clinton’s response at about 6 minutes and 20 seconds into the video, was as part of her answer, “We’re still getting to know who these people are. ” [In other words, it doesn't matter who they are, we have already bought them.]

where she will meet with the Libyan opposition [Who flew these puppets to London? In what airplane did they fly? It is a No Fly Zone. How did they get to an airport that functioned? Who vouched that they were representatives of an actual organization that represented the entire 6 million Libyans? Who elected this 'opposition'? What makes them legitimate? ] and consult with more than thirty nations. [Many of them in opposition to colonization]. These discussions will focus on what kind of political effort is necessary to pressure Gaddafi, while also supporting a transition to the future that the Libyan people deserve. [smear 22. As outlined by McKinney in introduction, Libyans already had more benefits than Americans.] Because, while our military mission is narrowly focused on saving lives [savior 22, by destroying a sovereign country's water and electricity and using Depleted Uranium Ammunition],

A telecommunication official told Libyan state television that the three stations hit by NATO strikes provided communication services for citizens to contact the fire brigades, hospitals and emergency lines and communication between eastern and western Libya.

Muammar Gaddafi has addressed nation via Libyan radio

“But certainly what has been coming from the Western media has been proven to be lies,” he declared.

Gaddafi opened up the armories to the people of Libya, more than a million rifles and other arms have been handed out to the people of Tripoli. [this must be exaggeration] The claim that has been made by the so-called ‘progressive’ media of the United States is that Gaddafi is a hated dictator and that this is an indigenous rebellion. A dictator does not hand people guns and say: ‘Please, defend me!’”

Arms Trade Resource Center – …The ongoing civil war in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (formerly Zaire) is a prime example of the devastating legacy of U.S. arms sales policy on Africa. The U.S. prolonged the rule of Zairian dictator Mobutu Sese Soko by providing more than $300 million in weapons and $100 million in military training. Mobutu used his U.S. – supplied arsenal to repress his own people and plunder his nation’s economy for three decades, [is this true or not? By now, the reader must suspect allegations and be very discerning and investigative. Who funds this research center. I think it is trustworthy because it questions Empire] until his brutal regime was overthrown by Laurent Kabila’s forces in 1997. When Kabila took power, the Clinton administration quickly offered military support by developing a plan for new training operations with the armed forces…

« The president-elect is coming into office at a moment when there is upheaval in many parts of the world simultaneously,” Kissinger responded. “You have India, Pakistan; you have the jihadist movement. [CIA funded] So he can’t really say there is one problem, that it’s the most important one. But he can give new impetus to American foreign policy partly because the reception of him is so extraordinary around the world. His task will be to developan overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a new world order can be created. It’s a great opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis.” [The strategy was already created and which is what placed both Bush Jr and Obama. It is called « Full Spectrum Dominance » as instrument of New World Order]

Wanted for Crimes Against Humanity - Henry Kissenger

obama%20and%20kissenger dans Politique/Societe

 

And as President, I refused [Savior 24] to wait for the images of slaughter[smear 27] and mass graves before taking action.

[He repeatedly takes responsibility, because he does not think he will ever be caught. He is confident, above all laws, a good war criminal. However he will be arrested. The world is waking up. The UN resolution 1973 of No Fly Zone was grossly broken using USA intelligence.There are many images now of slaughter of civilians by NATO, but Western media is suppressing it, and alternative reporters have been killed and threatened.]

Order: Kill Non-Mainstream Reporters in Libya, What U.S. is Hiding?

- Deborah Dupre - Examiner

This journalist Thierry Meyssan inTripoli was threatened.

Meyssan observations Aug 21, 2011.. NATO Carnage in Tripoli


Moreover, America has an important strategic interest
 [Which is what? He never explains.] in preventing Gaddafi from overrunning those who oppose him. A massacre [smear 28] would have driven thousands of additional refugees across Libya’s borders,

[This had already happened as seen in photo below. Note the nice luggage of refugees in photo. These are well off educated citizens of a stable nation running for their lives because of covert mercenary meddling by West, for their OIL. The reader probably has similar luggage. None of these people expected this.]

-libya-tunisia-borderTens of thousands of desperate refugees were packing the Tunisian border on Tuesday Mar 2, 2011, trying to get out of Libya.

putting enormous strains on the peaceful – yet fragile – transitions in Egypt and Tunisia. [The protests continue as the new regimes are just new puppet regimes]    The democratic [in double speak "democratic means top/down control] impulses that are dawning [hope mantra 3] across the region would be eclipsed by the darkest form [smear 29 He will use the word 'dark' again, and he, Obama, is the light? Gaddafi, the idealistic leader who gives free health care and education, helped end Apartheid and was to fund an all Africa Satellite and form an all Africa currency is considered 'dark' by Obama.]

of dictatorship, as repressive leaders concluded that violence is the best strategy to cling to power. [at least he describes the New World Order well here and what we can expect as we demand accountability in Europe and North America]

The writ of the UN Security Council would have been shown to be little more than empty words, [See references below how UN Resolution 1973 was in fact not followed as Putin, above, noted] crippling its future credibility to uphold global peace and security.

UN gives a nod and wink to USA $46 billion in arms sales for 2011.As Gaddafi correctly said in speech to UN in New York last year, « Security Council is terrorist organization in world »

Thus, Obama is carrying on myth that UN is an independent credible organization. UN is a tool for centralized global control, under the thumb of USA who denied a visa so that Libya could have no representation in UN for the entire crises.

The Role of the UN Security Council in Unleashing an Illegal War against Libya by Ronda Hauben www.globalresearch.ca

< See entire article to left.

… As of February 21, the Libyan government has been deprived of the ability to have a representative to the UN. In March, when the Libyan government tried to appoint another Ambassador, the US government did not grant a visa.”

So while I will never minimize the costs involved in military action, I am convinced that a failure to act in Libya would have carried a far greater price [for gasoline] for America. 

Now, just as there are those who have argued against intervention in Libya, there are others who have suggested that we broaden our military mission beyond the task of protecting [Savior 25] the Libyan people, and do whatever it takes to bring down Gaddafi and usher in a new government. [So then, your war is just a soft war Mr Obama? Not a hard war? Incredibly he is now painting himself as a moderate.]

Of course, there is no question [just obey] that Libya – and the world [The World excluding Germany, China, India, Russia, Africa and Brazil] – will be better off with Gaddafi out of power. [He is lying. Will Africa be better off?] I, along with many other world leaders, [NATO leaders?] have embraced that goal[of getting rid of this obstacle to Empire, who has 3% of world's oil], and will actively pursue it through non-military means. [double speak] But broadening our military mission to include regime change would be a mistake. [The entire speech is about regime change, a nice way of saying occupation. And 'mission' was broadened... 8000 sorties. All diplomatic attempts by Gaddafi were brushed away.]

Washington Post Apr 4, 2011

Libyan Foreign Minister Abdulati al-Obeidi told reporters in Tripoli on Friday, “We are trying to talk to the British, the French and the Americans to stop the killing of people. We are trying to find a mutual solution.”

…The Obama administration and its allies and partners in the Libya operation have shown little interest in such offers. President Obama has described his demand for Gaddafi’s departure as a political objective…


The task that I 
[takes full responsibility] assigned our forces – to protect[savior 25] the Libyan people from immediate danger, and to establish a No Fly Zone – carries with it a UN mandate and international support. [Repeat a lie enough times... fake coalition 20]  It is also what the Libyan opposition[contracted by CIA] asked us to do.  [It is what the USA on ground told the USA in air what to do and these foreigners are called 'the rebels'... See Libyan Tribes Manifesto below]

If we tried to overthrow Gaddafi by force, our coalition would splinter. [So we won't use force right? Is this what he infered in this speech ?] We would likely have to put U.S. troops on the ground, or risk killing many civilians from the air. [Did that on Aug 21]  The dangers faced by our men and women in uniform [heroes 2] would be far greater. So would the costs, and our share of the responsibility for what comes next. 

To be blunt, we went down that road in Iraq . [He is lying as he used past tense. USA is still going down that road now and is committed to that road indefinitely as was planned decades ago and as shown by 14 permanent bases immediately constructed after USa murderous assault on Iraqis. USA has no intention on leaving Iraq until the oil gone. Libya is same exact story]

Thanks to the extraordinary sacrifices of our troops [heroes 3] and the determination of our diplomats, we are hopeful about Iraq’s future. [With our 14 permanent military bases, the private oil companies and Haliburton andKBR are hopeful.]

 

But regime change there took eight years, [If it already happened, why are we still there?]  thousands of American and [millions] Iraqi lives, and nearly a trillion dollars. That is not something we can afford to repeat in Libya. 

[So whats the endgame in Libya look like? Complete suppression? Because the Libyan people will resist occupation forever, right? Just like Iraq and Afghanistan and Viet Nam. There is no way to win when making someone a victim is the game. Colonization won't work in a communicating world. The blowback in Europe from angry Moslems will not be pretty. However, those at the top want violence as excuse for martial law. Our work is to wake up and remove them from power.] 

As the bulk of our military effort ratchets down, [Has it?] what we can do – and will do – is support the aspirations [hope mantra 4] of the Libyan people. [Savior 27] We have intervened to stop a massacre, [third of forth time with this lie? Smear 30] and we will work with our allies and partners[fake coalition 21] as they’re in the lead to maintain the safety of civilians.[Savior 28]

We will deny the regime arms, cut off its supply of cash [water, electricity, food, communications], assist the opposition [with more "contracts"], and work with other nations [fake coalition 22] to hasten the day when Gaddafi leaves power.

It may not happen overnight, as a badly weakened Gaddafi tries desperately [smear 31] to hang on to power. [smear 32] But it should be clear [obey] to those around Gaddafi, and to every Libyan, that history is not on his side. [As you hear the bombs you know history is not on the side of the sovereign days when you Libyans had your own nation. Now history is on the side of the bombs.]

With the time [rebuilding everything] and space [without loved ones, killed by NATO] that we have provided [Savior 29] for the Libyan people, they[mercenaries] will be able to determine their own destiny, and that is how it should be. [This is horrific double speak. When will Americans have same ability? When will American elections not be rigged? See American Blackout. When will money no longer buy representation?] 

Let me close by addressing what this action says about the use of America’s military power, and America’s broader
 [Self appointed and self serving] leadership in the world [A definition of world that excludes Germany, India, China, Africa, Brazil or Russia], under my presidency. [Savior 30 ] 

As Commander-in-Chief, I have no greater responsibility than keeping this country safe. [Savior 31 The only super power is worried about this? Well, there were those guys in the caves who took down World Trade Center Building 7 at 5:30 pm on 9/11 that the reader may have never heard of becasue it not discussed by controlled media or in coverup 9/11 official report. Remember those guys in the cave that started the ‘War on Terror’ ? Please see the Womens Pagefor more info on 9/11]

10 second video. The Controlled Demolition of World Trade Center Building 7 at 5:30 PM on Sept 11, 2001 which never was hit by a plane, with small fires allowed to burn all day. Watch how it falls. Did a man on kidney dialysis living in a cave tell the fire fighters to stand back? Who did this? And more importantly, who covered this up?

And no decision weighs on me more than when to deploy our men and women in uniform. [Heroes 4.  Pledge allegiance to the uniform.  He is actually using mind control.]   I have made it clear that I will never hesitate [strong leader ] to use our military swiftly, decisively, and unilaterally when necessary to defend our people, our homeland, our allies [NATO], and our core interests. [Other people's resources]

That is why we are going after al Queda wherever they seek a foothold.[And we will invent a foothold where we want to defend our 'core interests', as we have done repeatedly all over the world. It is called Empire.] That is why we continue to fight in Afghanistan, [« Al queda » left years ago.  Why is USA really there?   Why did Unocal want and get a pipeline there? and who will defend it? Why did USA start up opium after Taliban ended it?]

even as we have ended our combat mission in Iraq [Ended combat in Iraq? Every day, right now, we are killing civilians in Iraq so we can steal their oil.  This statement of ‘ending’ it will give war resisters and anti-war veterans proof of fraud.See Veterans Page] and removed more than 100,000 troops from that country. [And left 50,000 troops indefinitely?]

 

 

There will be times, though, when our safety is not directly threatened, but our interests [controlling other nations] and values [seeing ourselves as superior] are. [The USA has never been threatened but we have started more wars than all the other countries combined. However, Americans are waking up. The 2010 military budget equaled 94% of federal income tax? And Mr. Obama wants to gut services and chop social security to balance budget?]

Sometimes, the course of history poses challenges that threaten our common humanity and common security [This is prep talk for planned false flag global emergency as excuse for global martial law… this is what  was planned with WHO pandemic swine flu, but it failed.  We can be sure other global emergencies are in works..]

– responding to natural disasters [except Somalia or any place we want to see weakened.  Have we ever aided Cuba with one hurricane for 50 years?], for example; or preventing genocide [Pot Pot Cambodia (USA) and Rwanda Genocide (NATO) would not have happened without being backed] and keeping the peace [control]; ensuring regional security [status quo empire], and maintaining the flow of commerce [so empire can extract as much as possible and enslave other nations with IMF debt].

These may not be America’s problems alone, but they are important to us, and they are problems worth solving. [For Obama the problem is.... "keeping, ensuring, maintaining" . Not inequity or disparity or lying or corruption. For Obama and Kissinger, the problem is how to maintain king of the mountain status, not how to bring sovereignty to all people. Obama is a colonialist.]

And in these circumstances, we know that the United States, as the world’s most powerful nation [the most in debt with the biggest war budget and most brainwashed people], will often be called upon to help. [Savior 31. But it is not within our superior values to help.  US only sacrifices if it helps our 'core interests". Did we help the people of Laos? ] 

In such cases, we should not be afraid [Don't be a coward, be a man, follow your President] to act – but the burden of action [Lets congratulate ourselves for all of our sacrifice] should not be America’s alone.

As we have in Libya, our task is instead to mobilize the international [fake coalition 24] community for collective action. [But don't have Congress vote for collective action] Because contrary to the claims of some [who?], American leadership is not simply a matter of going it alone and bearing all of the burden ourselves. [Repeating word Burden 3 times to make Americans feel we have carried so much weight for others. A lie.]

Real leadership [Like Obama?] creates the conditions and coalitions for others [others to work with NATO?] to step up as well; to work with allies and partners [fake coalition 25] so that they bear their share of the burden [4th time] and pay their share of the costs [Libya will have to pay to rebuild itself, just like Iraq. This is who will work with NATO]; and to see that the principles of justice and human dignity are upheld by all. [pure double speak] 

That’s the kind of leadership [savior 32] we

[Who is we? It is not Congress because they were bypassed. It is not NATO that USA controls. It is not Obama who is just a robot fulfilling plans laid decades before? Who is we? Who controls Council of Foreign Relations that Hillary bows to? Who times the orcheastrated events we witness?]

have shown in Libya. Of course, even when we act as part of a coalition[fake coalition 26], the risks [for civilians] of any military action will be high. Those risks were realized when one of our planes malfunctioned over Libya.

Yet when one of our airmen parachuted to the ground, in a country whose leader has so often demonized the United States [smear 34] – in a region that has such a difficult history with our country [Is he refering to Western meddling? Our attacks and crippling embargoes against any country that stands against Empire, like Libya or Cuba? ] – this American did not find enemies.

Instead, he was met by people who embraced him. One young Libyan who came to his aid said, “We are your friends. We are so grateful to these men who are protecting the skies.” [No one would ever say that! Protecting the skies and forcing a food embargo on a country? This is all a lie.] 

 The CIA managed mercenaries picked up the pilot and he was taken to a hotel.

This voice is just one of many [fabricated lies] in a region where a new generation is refusing to be denied their rights and opportunities any longer. [That would be the fully educated generation in Libya with highest income in Africa? This is nothing like the protestors of Egypt who are hungry because world food prices have been run up by commodity traders and manipulated oil price.]

Rising Food Prices and the Egyptian Tinderbox: How Banks and Investors Are Starving the Third World Ellen Brown Feb 4, 2011

Let Them Eat Baklava: Food Prices and the Arab Spring Spencer Mandel Aug 26, 2011

Yes, this change will make the world more complicated for a time. Progress will be uneven, and change will come differently in different countries.

[It sounds like he is talking about the demand by youth for end of corruption and engineered disparity, but he will in next sentences redefine "change" as coming under the heel of empire as Iran had under the Shah and Iraq now has under military occupation. In this way he has co-opted the very essence of 'hope' which he had sold so well in his election campaign.]

There are places, like Egypt, where this change will inspire us and raise our hopes. [hope mantra 5] [Egypt protests were steered. New ‘leader’ of Egypt is CIA plant who is already receiving protests]

And there will be places, like Iran, where change [Meaning youthful hopes?] is fiercely suppressed.

Obama just set his sights on Iran…. AGAIN.

« Coup 1953 of Iran is the CIA’s (Central Intelligence Agency) first successful overthrow of a foreign government. 

But a copy of the agency’s secret history of the coup [in Iran] has surfaced, revealing the inner workings of a plot that set the stage for the Islamic revolution in 1979, and for a generation of anti-American hatred in one of the Middle East’s most powerful countries. The document, which remains classified, discloses the pivotal role British intelligence officials played in initiating and planning the coup, and it shows that Washington and London shared an interest in maintaining the West’s control over Iranian oil. …. The operation, code-named TP-AJAX, was the blueprint for a succession of CIA plots to foment coups and destabilize governments during the cold war – including the agency’s successful coup in Guatemala in 1954 and the disastrous Cuban intervention known as the Bay of Pigs in 1961. In more than one instance, such operations led to the same kind of long-term animosity toward the United States that occurred in Iran…. «  continue

Iranians threw Shah out in Iran’s People Power ‘Arab Spring’ 30 years ago.  They already had their overthrow of tyranny (US planted Shah who replaced democracy) and now Iran has large opposition demonstrations exactly like USA did in Wisconsin recently, and Seattle in WTO protests 1999. Protests are a sign of freedom and Iran has it. whereas now, in USA protests are NOT REPORTED because Lying Government / controlled media is terrified of snowball effect.

At least 1,400 arrests for antiwar dissent, but who’s counting? Not the press. July 22, 2011

« The national news media almost totally ignore homefront protests of the Afghanistan war, killer drones, torture, and more, regardless of their newsworthiness…. » continued.

We know Ahmadinejad has been demonized by West, and our government/media even changed the translation of a statement he made, to claim he wanted death of Israel, which he never said.

« Ahmadinejad’s October 2005 speech was mis-translated  from Persian into English by the Middle East Media Research Institute (Memri), owned by two Zionist Israeli Jews, Meyrav Wurmser and Col. Yigal Carmon. The translation quoting Ahmadinejad calling for Israel being “wiped off the map” – has become as much part of the Jewish religion as…. continued (you may find the site disabled on interent explorer browser « by coincidence » and difficult to view).

« When properly translated the Iranian president actually calls for the removal of the regimes that are in power in Israel and in the USA as a goal for the future. Nowhere does he demand the elimination or annihilation of Israel. He called for greater governance for Palestine. The word map does not even feature. And the president makes plain that the Holocaust happened, but, he argues western powers have exploited the memory of the Holocaust for their own imperialistic purposes. What the mainstream ran with is complete deception. »

USA also lies about Iran nuclear intentions, while Iran allows IEAE inspections and is above board on its projects….

« The continuous efforts of the world’s two militarist-aggressor states–the United States and Israel–to demonize Iran was addressed by Ahmadinejad in his speech to the UN General Assembly (September 23). Ahmadinejad spoke of the assault on human dignity and spiritual values by the selfish material interests of the US and its puppet states. Seeking hegemony « under the mantle of freedom, » the US and its puppets use « the ugliest methods of intimidation and deceit » to disguise that they are « the first who violate » the fundamental principles that they espouse and apply to others. «  - Paul Craig Roberts

USA wants Iran oil. The question is whether Iranians would want an occupation like Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya? What is the reader’s guess? Since none of these occupied countries were given a choice in taking « freedom » and are now killing USA troops as fast as possible, what is Obama’s plans for Iran? Another occupation, as we can expect now in Libya « to maintain peace »?

This is the pattern and so, in the same speech he justifies the rape and looting of Libya he drops in the name Iran to prep everyone for the planned war « to save the yearning youth » of Iran.

The dark forces of civil conflict and sectarian war will have to be averted, and difficult political and economic concerns addressed.

[What sectarian war? In Iran? Where? In Iraq 'sectarian' war is the excuse for continued USA presence. In fact, there is no sectarian war, there is a united front against USA occupation. How to keep the 'sectarian war ' myth alive? The way endless "sectarian conflict" is insured is by using false flag terrorism. If this is a new subject for reader, the reality is shocking. We can expect this to happen in Libya also. The USA will continue killing and claim it is sectarian inter-tribal conflict and this will justify a 'peace keeping force' (this was written Aug 25th). Will NATO use mercenaries, or risk NATO troops getting killed? Let us review the current policy of fomenting sectarian divisions in Iraq and Pakistan]

Kay Griggs, former wife of U.S. Marine Corps Colonel George Griggs, Chief of Staff, Marine Atlantic/Head of Psychological Operations, NATO, describes elements of de-stabilization programs….

 

 

 

« The evidence that the US directly contributed to the creation of the current civil war in Iraq by its own secretive security strategy is compelling. Historically of course this is nothing new – divide and rule is a strategy for colonial powers… »The Politics of Suicide in the Muslim World by Nashid Abdul-Khaaliq

Iraqi Terrorists Exposed as British Government Agent  Provocateurs

« Lest we forget who the real Terrorists are… You might recall this incident in Iraq, back in September 2005. It’s a rare instance where the perps of a false flag op were caught red-handed. Every time one hears of “terrorist” bombings in Iraq or Afghanistan, chances are it’s US, Brit, or Mossad agents creating mayhem in order to justify the illegal occupations of these countries. Yet, the sheeple hardly give this a second thought — even after this incident was blown wide open in the MSM … continue here.

british-terrorists

Long history of manipulation with false flag terror

Fake Al Qaeda | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED

« CIA/US Military Perpetrated Most of Iraq’s « Suicide Bombings! » by Andrew G. Marshal
Terrorism Guaranteed by manager Donald Rumseld - Counterpunch

Suicide bombing favorite US counter insurgency tactic

Press TV – NATO plans to arm Syria criminal gangs Aug 14, 2011

There are many many more articles on this. There are entire Departments and schools in Military devoted to false flag murder.

 

Video Below – Minister Farrakan to Obama on USA De-stabilization Policy [Powerful message - Starts out soft but principle makes him roar.]

 

 

 

[we return to speech] 
The United States will not be able to dictate the pace and scope of this change. 
[Interesting sentence.... is  being able to dictate a consideration? Sounds like it.] Only the people of the region can do that. But we can make a difference. [We can send in mercenaries. That is what we did in Iraq, Afghanistan, and now Libya, and in fact all over the world.]

I believe that this movement of change [in this new double speak "movement of change" refers to New World Order ] cannot be turned back, and that we must stand alongside

[Exactly here he achievs the co-option. At first the 'movement of change' was youthful voices. But in this sentence 'movement of change is equated with....]

those who believe in the same core principles [$ and domination] that have guided us through many storms [what storms? Desert Storms?] our opposition to violence directed against one’s own citizens

[Where? In recent London riots? In Seattle 1999 WTO demonstration? How about deployment of Blackwater mercenaries for Katrina? USA has six times more people in prison than the world’s average number. Land of the jailed.]; our support for a set of universal rights, including the freedom for people to express themselves and choose their leaders [Our own elections are rigged with voting machines and disenfranchisement of Black votes];our support for governments that are ultimately responsive to the aspirations [hope mantra 5] of the people.

[It is opposite. the last thing Empire wants is a sovereign individual or community]

As we have studied, there is NO example of USA helping anyone without making a profit or gaining influence. USA core values, as shown by the financial plans of corporations in crushed Iraq, and now Libya, is a very far cry from ‘youthful voices’, but he spanned the gap with double speak.

It is vital for the reader to understand mind programming. The method is that if you listen enough times that ‘slavery is freedom’, you will believe it. Is the reader free? You work for 2 to 3 months per year to pay your federal income tax, and 94% of your tax will be to feed the military budjet based on fake « War on Terror », but you are free, right? You live in a ‘free’ country right? You live in a democracy right? You’ve been told this thousands of times. You have crossed your heart and said it. You have been told that slavery is freedom, and I’m sure the reader is thinking, « I am no slave ». But you are being used. Let me please ask you again. Do you live in a free country?

How will your mind answer? Do you think you live in a free country where we are informed so we can make sound decisions? Or are we slaves of disinformation, sweating to pay for things we have no control over?

It is important to reprogram ourselves. We are slaves. We are slaves. We are slaves. Perhaps we should repeat that 10,000 times just to get things even, because until you realize that you have been used as the Veterans have, you will continue to be used. – Ray Songtree


Born, as we are, out of a revolution by those who longed 
[hope mantra 6] to be free [and created a Constitution which Obama is destroying. See index... No the revolution wasn't based on longing. It was based on principle. Obama sold us hope. He did this because he had no principles to offer. Ron Paul and Dennis Kuninich and McKinney and Farrakan don't sell hope. They stand by principle. ] , we welcome the fact that history is on the move in the Middle East and North Africa, and that young people are leading the way.

[Young people are protesting, and CIA is moving in to co-opt. Remember what Kissinger said... crisis is an opportunity for a new world order. Does Obama support guerrilla fighters against outside empire the way Americans fought English Empire? If so, then he will like the Manifesto of 200 Libyan Tribes below]

Because wherever people long to be free, they will find a friend in the United States. [Double speak. Where ever people want change, USA will promote instability to insert its own agents.]

Ultimately, it is that faith [hope mantra 7] – those ideals – that are the true measure of American leadership. [So he equates himself, the leader against 'dark' Gaddafi as 'that faith'. Sound like another Savior 33]

[The arrogant attitude of superiority is that "America" is destined to lead everyone else and this justifies our huge military, where we 'lead' by covert and outright threats.  Why are there US military bases on Venezuela borders now? Chavez is as good a leader as any in South America, but Venezuela has OIL!]

My fellow Americans, I know that at a time of upheaval overseas – when the news is filled with conflict [which we fund] and change [Actual change is constant and intrinsic... but he defined change already. Change is domination by NWO, the opportunity for more centralization.] – it can be tempting to turn away from the world. And as I have said before, our strength abroad is anchored in our strength at home. [20% unemployment. So slaves, not only are you free, but you are strong at home.] 

That must always be our North Star [Like the HAARP display over Oslo for Peace prize?] – the ability of our people to reach their potential [pay student loans, pay mortgages?], to make wise choices with our resources [Strip mine everything and drill no matter the risk], to enlarge the prosperity [the debt ceiling] that serves as a wellspring of our power [guns], and to live the values that we hold so dear. [ Posse Comitatus, Habeas Corpus, the Bill of Rights… or… TSA, SWAT teams, wire tapping, dumbed down… what values are we living? Constitution or Patriot Act? Which?] 

But let us also remember that for generations, we have done the hard work of protecting our own people [?], as well as millions around the globe. [We killed millions in southeast Asia for what? World War I and II and the Bolshevics and Mao were all funded by Western bankers. What is he talking about?1.5 million in Iraq killed, for what?]

Over one million Iraqis have met violent deaths as a result of the 2003 invasion, according to a study conducted by the prestigious British polling group, Opinion Research Business (ORB). These numbers suggest that the invasion and occupation of Iraq rivals the mass killings of the last century—the human toll exceeds the 800,000 to 900,000 believed killed in the Rwandan genocide in 1994, and is approaching the number (1.7 million) who died in Cambodia’s infamous “Killing Fields” during the Khmer Rouge era of the 1970s. Project Censored

We have done so because we know that our own future is safer and brighter if more of mankind can live with the bright light [hope mantra 7] of freedom and dignity. [Double Speak. Up equals down. He means New World Order which is no freedom and no dignity. Did he hypnotize you yet? He said it all many many many many times.]

Tonight, let us give thanks for the Americans who are serving through these trying times [the fooled an misused heroes], and the coalition [NATO fake coalition 27] that is carrying our [possessive pronoun] effort forward; and let us look to the future with confidence and hope [hope mantra 8] not only for our own country, but for all those yearning [hope mantra 9] for freedom[double speak] around the world. [where he wants to bring his brand of freedom... global] Thank you, God Bless you, and may God Bless the United States of America. [If you disagree with him you are going against God. Nice touch, used by every con man in every land in every era. Perhaps listening for Truth is more important than giving up our principles because someone invokes the name of God.]   

Summary

Lets see if Obama did well by Hitler…

Adolf Hitler said: ‘Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.’

goebbels_1

And his propaganda chief, Joseph Goebbels, said: ‘The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly – it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over.« 

Smeared Gaddafi 34 times, claimed USA and himself as Savior 32 times, mentioned a bogus ‘international community » that excludes Germany, Asia, Africa, South America and Russia, that is really just USA controled and funded NATO, 27 times, and the Hope Mantra so that justice is always put off to the future and not based on principle 9 times.

Please consider this incredible amount of mind programming. And the entire purpose was to make night become day, and day become night. Gaddafi has been altruistic and is slandered to be a demon. USA is the most war mongering and murderous country in history and is portrayed as Savior.

Was that purpose of speech? It surely was not to inform, as it was all lies. So this is the Hitler technique, repeat the lie over and over and over again, so that every sentence includes a lie. In just over 100 sentences we see lies 34 times, 32 times, 27 times, and 9 times.

Did the hero save the damsel in distress from the Bad guy as the speech promises?

In Reality USA siezed Libya by the throat on completely fabricated charges. There was never violent suppression of demonstrations because there were no demonstrations.

In this short BBC video, we are shown a crowd of happy people celebrating overthrow of Gaddafi, but the trouble is, the clip is from India. Short clip worth watching more than once.The entire presentation on news of what has happened in Libya is one long lie. Here is article showing analysis of another fake celebration in Tripoli.

  

 

The Obama Libya War Speech is comforting ‘big daddy mind control’ for those who have been conditioned to ‘respect the President’. The cure for this disease is studying the truth, being shocked by the matrix of lies, rejecting belief in authority, and cultivating personal sovereignty. « I will never be a sheeple again! » « Not on my watch!. » « Not with my taxes! » « Not in my community! » Replace « hope » with principle and we can save this world.

- Ray Songtree Aug 27, 2011 

Would you like to create a new Curriculum of Honest History and Science for our schools. Become a member.

 

 

some LINKS to more Study

some links on Lockerbie 1988 Pan Am crash blamed on Libya

1. bionicboy.tripod.com/tragedy. html -  The one given most credence is that Libya was behind the bombing – two …. 25/5/2000: An air accidentinvestigator has told the Lockerbie trial there was a … Protheroe testified in the specially built Scottish court in the Netherlands that he 

2. Wikipedia , the official NWO disinformation rag, outlines the compensation Libya gave to victims in order to remove sanctions   » On 24 February 2004, Libyan Prime Minister Shukri Ghanem stated in a BBCRadio 4 interview that his country had paid the compensation as the « price for peace » and to secure the lifting of sanctions. Asked if Libya did not accept guilt, he said, « I agree with that. » 
In other words, Libya always denied any involvement with Pan Am 103 crash.


3. Meanwhile, because of suppressed evidence, just like 911, there is a current Pan Am 103 jet crash truth movement in UK.   
« On 2 September 2009, former MEP Michael McGowan demanded that the British Government call for an urgent, independent inquiry led by the UN to find out the truth about Pan Am flight 103. « We owe it to the families of the victims of Lockerbie and the international community to identify those responsible, » In other words, many in UK know the Libya terrorist story was a lie.

Also http://lockerbiecase.blogspot.com/2009/11/former-diplomat-urges-macaskill-to.html

4. Wiki-encyclopedia rag does not cover CIA who placed bomb. 
see here http://www.welfarestate.com/ panam103/

there are many more references which I have not listed

more links (to be edited… site under construction)

  1. Libya : Oil, Banks, the United Nations and America’s Holy Crusade

    www. globalresearch .ca/index. php?context=va&aid=24151 - Libya : Oil, Banks, the United Nations and America’s Holy Crusade. by Felicity Arbuthnot. Global Research , April 5, 2011. Email this article to a friend. Print this .. ?

  2. Putin Likens UN Security Council Resolution on Libya to a Medieval …

    www. globalresearch .ca/index. php?context=va&aid=23833 – Putin Likens UN Security Council Resolution on Libya to a Medieval Crusade. Global Research , March 21, 2011. Russian Information Agency Novosti … 

  3. UN Security Council Resolution on Libya : No Fly Zone and Other …

    www. globalresearch .ca/index. php?context=va&aid=23780 - UNSecurity Council Resolution on Libya : No Fly Zone and Other Measures. Global Research , March 18, 2011. Email this article to a friend. Print this article … 

  4. Libya , Hypocrisy and Betrayal by the United Nations : Death and …

    www. globalresearch .ca/index. php?context=va&aid=23767 – Mar 18, 2011 – Global Economic Crisis … Global Research RSS Feed … Libya, Hypocrisy and Betrayal by the United Nations : Death and Destruction. … 

  5. France arming Libyan rebels in violation of UNresolution

    www. globalresearch .ca/index. php?context=va&aid=25494 – Jul 3, 2011 – France has become the first country openly to admit it has supplied the Libyan rebels with weapons – a measure banned by theUN Security … 

  6. UN Praised Libya’s Human … – Centre for Research on Globalization

    www. globalresearch .ca/index. php?context=va&aid=24154 - UNPraised Libya’s Human Rights Record. Washington Attempted to Block Release of UNHRC Report. Global Research , April 5, 2011. Email this article to a … 

  7. Obama’s Bay of Pigs in Libya : Imperialist Aggression Shreds UN 

    www. globalresearch .ca/index. php?context=va&aid=23847 – Obama’s Bay of Pigs in Libya : Imperialist Aggression Shreds UNCharter. by Dr. Webster G. Tarpley. Global Research , March 22, 2011.http://tarpley.net/  

  8. UN Security Council Role in Unleashing an … – TheGlobal Realm

    the global realm.com/…/ un – security-council-role-in- unleashing-an-ill… – Jul 28, 2011 – UN Security Council Role in Unleashing an Illegal War against Libya . by Ronda Hauben Global Research July 20, 2011. Journalists Question … 

  9. UK Indymedia – Obama to Qaddafi: Comply with UNresolution or …

    www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2011/ 03/476220.html .Libya , hypocrisy and betrayal by the United Nations : Death and destruction. US-NATO’s new war in North Africa by Felicity Arbuthnot, Global Research ,

  1. Libya : “The Price of Freedom” | NWO Observer

    nwoobserver.wordpress.com/ 2011/04/…/ libya -the-price- of-freedom… -Apr 28, 2011 – Published: Apr. 27, 2011 – Global Research. Libya has the highest living standard in Africa. The “ United NationsDevelopment Program … 

  2. Another war for oil: UN approves Libyan no fly zone and military action

    www.minorityperspective.co.uk/ …/another-war-for-oil- Mar 18, 2011 – Professor Michel Chossudovsky ( Global Research : “OperationLibya ” and the Battle for Oil: Redrawing the Map of Africa: March 9, 2011) states … 

  3. Libya Intervention: Obama Wrongly Adopts U.N.“Responsibility to …

    www.heritage.org/ research /…/ libya -intervention-obama- wrongly-ad… – Mar 31, 2011 – The President’s Justification for the LibyanIntervention …. 2130, May 1, 2008, at http://www.heritage.org/Research /Reports/2008/05/ … for Global Solutions, athttp://globalsolutions.org/ 08orbust/pcq/clinton (March 31, 2011). … 

  4. Secret War Games Suggest US, UK … – Environmentalists Against War

    www.envirosagainstwar.org/know/read.php?itemid=10805 - Apr 23, 2011 – Under an Imaginary UN Security Council Resolution 3003. Prof. Michel Chossudovsky / Global Research THE WAR ON LIBYAWAS KNOWN … 

  5. BEFORE RESOLUTION 1973, THE U.N. PRAISED LIBYAFOR ITS HUMAN …

    libya 360.wordpress.com/…/ before-resolution-1973-the-u- n-praised-... Apr 4, 2011 – Global Research . 1. The Working Group on the Universal Periodic … 1 thought on “BEFORE RESOLUTION 1973, THE U.N. PRAISED LIBYA FOR ITS … 

  6. Russia, NATO differ on Libya resolution – Lavrov | World | RIA Novosti

    en.rian.ru/world/20110704/ 165014778.html Jul 4, 2011 – Russia and NATO have different views of UN Security Council …. Al Qaeda to Kill Qaddafi, Global Research , March 25, 2011, emphasis added) … 

  7. Libyan PM urges UN intervention to stop NATO military attack …

    williambowles.info/…/ libyan – pm-urges- un -intervention-to- stop-nato… Jul 11, 2011 – NATO Prepares ‘Humanitarian’ Occupation OfLibya Thousands of NATO troops … Global Research : NATO’s Bloody War of Aggression in Libya  

  8. Libya Oil Grab Disguised As Humanitarian Assistance: ‘No-Fly Zone …

    www.twf.org/News/Y2011/0308- Oil.html Mar 8, 2011 – While others clamor for a no-fly zone over Libya , the Libyan rebels’ themselves … Gulf Cooperation Council demands that the UN Security Council take all …. Attempted Coup d’Etat in Libya ?, » globalresearch .ca, March 7, 2011 … 

  9. SUSAN LINDAUER: LIBYA’S BLOOD FOR OIL: THE VAMPIRE WAR …

    news-now.org/2011/…/susan- lindauer- libya ‘s-blood-oil- vampire-wa… Apr 2, 2011 – And of course the United Nations forced Gadhaffi to hand over two Libyan …. Chossudovsky at the Global ResearchCentre are must reading: … 

  10. Bay of Pigs in Libya : Imperialist Aggression Shreds UNCharter …

    www.projectworldawareness.com/ …/bay-of-pigs-in- libya – imperialist… -Mar 24, 2011 – Global Research , March 22, 2011 On March 19, US and British cruise … Libya had responded to the UNvote by declaring a cease-fire, but

Media disinformation in West

 

 

Who is Gaddafi?

A Story about Libya, the Great Man Made River, Psy-Op, and the use of Media. Audio only 25 minutes

 

 

 

We must cry to think that our tax dollars are paying to destroy other countries so we can steal their resources and enjoy the comfort of ignoring what we have done. 

In destroying Libya’s water infrastructure and even their water pipe factory, we can see the plan in Libya was to create a completely traumatized impoverished populace, dependent on NATO.  More than that, in destroying archaeological sites, NATO= USA wants the cultural identity of the native people to be erased. Sovereignty must be destroyed in an oil colony. 

But since we in the West will never hear what is really happening in Libya, we taxpayers now have 
« plausible deniability » .  With orchestrated controlled disinformation by  mainstream media, our tax money can now go to crimes against humanity.  We must do more than weep now.  We must turn this around by educating our neighbors. » – Ray Songtree     

Looming Tragedy: Vision of the “New Libya” 
http://www.globalresearch.ca/ index.php?context=va&aid=26353   Sept 3 2011 

excerpts below 

« Queues of cars now wait for petrol in another oil rich country; other queues form, carrying containers for water. The multibillion dollar  development of Libya’s vast underground aquifers had been dubbed the “eighth wonder of the world. Libya`s water supply infrastructure has been been systematically bombed throughout the country. 

Shops are without food. 

The all is: “absolute disaster”, according to an eminent legal observer, very familiar with the country. 

And with electricity largely off, those seeking knowledge as to whether friends and relatives are alive, injured, fled, dead, find internet, and phones dead.

As the terribly injured overwhelm hospitals, many are bombed, damaged or without power and pharmaceuticals. 

No power: no incubators, life support machines or surgery. 

Another country with a modern, developed infrastructure reduced to a pre-industrial age – with the rebuilding contracts reportedly already being divvied out – in the West….

A number of lunches later, on the 23rd August, NATO spokeswoman, Oana Lungesco, re-affirmed their “mandate to protect civilians.” 

How this squares with hitting: “over five thousand [official figures] legitimate targets [in a] 24/7 operation [with] over twenty thousand sorties”, is confusing. 

The actual number of strikes has not been reported. Its in the tens of thousands. 

Equally so is how destruction of services essential to maintaining life, State institutions, schools, hospitals, archeological sites and treasures, attacking of all which is illegal under swathes of international law, are included in this “legitimacy.”

By September 1st, NATO operations from 31st March had reached: “a total of 21,090, including 7,920 strike sorties.”….. 

“The international community will be watching and supporting” Libya, said Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, adding requirements to the new Libyan constitution. There is a “clear road map to democracy.” Afghan and Iraqi puppets, now joined by Libyan ones.

When it comes to the rebuilding of Libya, “investors can’t call the tune”, was one theme, it must be “Libyan led.” 

UK Foreign Secretary William Hague blew that lie. Britain, he said: “would not be left behind.” Much focus was on rebuilding the oil industry. Heaven forbid that too, follows the Iraq model, with the bereaved, dispossessed and invaded blowing up the pipelines – and contractors…..

“30 April 2011: The bombing of the Downs Syndrome School in Tripoli

30 April 2011: The bombing of a Gaddafi residence, murdering Saif Gaddafi, his friend and 3 Gaddafi children.

13 May 2011: The murder of 11 Muslim Imams in Brega. 

12 June 2011: The bombing of the University of Tripoli. Death toll not yet established.

22 July 2011: The bombing of the Great Man made Waterway irrigation system, which supplies most Libyans with their drinking water.

23 July 2011: The bombing of the factory which makes the pipes for the water system, and the murder of 6 of its employees.

8th August 2011: The bombing of the Hospital at Zliten. Resulting in the murder of a minimum, of 50 human beings, many of them children. The bombing of hospitals is against all international laws, and a most grievous crime.

9 August 2011: The bombing of the village of Majer, resulting in the murder of 85 civilians. 33 Children, 32 women and 20 men.

The persistent ongoing bombing of the civilian population in Zliten and Tripoli, death toll not yet established.

David Cameron has admitted that UK special services have assisted the terrorists on the ground, in defiance of the UN mandate.”

Today, Cameron has gone further, admitting that British forces played a: “key role.”

Orwellian Democracy Overview

Classé dans : Politique/Societe — uriniglirimirnaglu @ 6 : 43

Orwellian Democracy Overview

 

 

In March 2011, Obama took responsibility for a new unjustified War and betrayed all who elected him as a relief from the Bush Administration.

The Obama ‘Let’s Attack Libya’ Speech Mar 29 2011: A Study in Double Speak

by Ray Songtree Aug 25, 2011

Historical Context of March 29, 2011 Obama Speech that American media never discusses , thus giving us a false sense of history and reality.

In 1998 a German TV program exposed CIA and Mossad Planting of April 5 1986 West Berlin Disco Bomb that had been blamed on Libya.

Three people were killed, two American. The official CIA website still continues the lie of blaming Libya. The history that guides the many tens of thousands of military and intelligence agents is false as is the official history that guides US policy and brain washes people on the « History Channel ». There will be agents who read these words. It is time to get on the honest side of history.

Nine days after the disco bombing, President Reagan used this false flag attack as excuse to bomb Libya in an attempt to assassinate Gaddafi, killing 67 people including Gaddafi’s adopted daughter. Reagan gave this address of US policy, another study in mind control lying which is a striking precursor to the Libya Speech of Obama.

Perhaps because of this known fact about inside job of 1986 disco bombing, Germany was only NATO country to avoid involvement in recent beheading of Libya.

In 1988 the CIA placed a suitcase bomb in Pan Am 103 which crashed in Lockerbie Scotland. Here is Another reference, there are many articles. Libya was blamed but denied any involvement. As a result of USA accusations, Libya was labeled a ‘terrorist state’ by the USA controlled UN and a painful embargo against the entire Libyan population was placed. A similar USA embargo in Iraq starved hundreds of thousands of children during same period.

The embargo against « the terrorist state » was lifted when Libya paid $1.5 billion as compensation for the crime they never commited.

« On 24 February 2004, Libyan Prime Minister Shukri Ghanemstated in a BBC Radio 4 interview that his country had paid the compensation as the « price for peace » and to secure the lifting of sanctions. Asked if Libya did not accept guilt, he said, « I agree with that. »

« I have never thought in dealing with this question [Pan Am 103] that it is correct for any particular country to be the complainant, the prosecutor and the judge at the same time’ » – Nelson Mandela

Presently there is a Lockerbie Pan Am 103 truth movement in UK.

We fast forward to Spring 2011.

According to one online timeline, (an obviously skewed disinformation website, because of its strict conforming to official story, lack of independent news inputs, and use of smear words like « crazed »), 7 days after an alleged Facebook posting calling for protest in Libya, « rebels take control of Benghazi », using a city of 700,000 people as a human shield, and CNN starts reporting from Benghazi.

So 7 days after a Facebook posting, a city of 700,000 is commandeered?

We can wonder how an organized rebellion could manifest from nothing to a fighting force within a few days? We will learn the CIA and NATO were already present before alleged Facebook posting. As you read below, you will see that CNN was offering disinformation propaganda from the very start. Independent journalists have now left Libya as they have been targeted. (Aug 26, 2011)

Just one week before Obama’s Mar 29, 2011 speech, the following was announced…

Mar 22, 2011 The African Union has called for an end to the military intervention in Libya... also here

This, and objections from many other countries stands in stark contrast to Obama’s claim of « international community » « saving » Libya, repeated 27 times in his speech. There is no international community that is censuring Libya, except NATO, a group of armed thugs who are recolonizing oil nation after oil nation, using deciet and utter brutality.

Please take the time to listen to this 14 minute video which gives some context of Gaddafi’s altruistic role in Africa. Website The oration is forceful. Control volume manually.

 

Much of the information in above video may have come from this article which also includes statements from Nelson Mandela.

‘For most Africans, Gaddafi is a generous man, a humanist, known for his unselfish support for the struggle against the racist regime in South Africa. If he had been an egotist, he wouldn’t have risked the wrath of the West to help the ANC (in South Africa) both militarily and financially in the fight against apartheid.

Orwellian Democracy Overview dans Politique/Societe africa-gaddafi-

This was why Mandela, soon after his release from 27 years in jail, decided to break the UN embargo and travel to Libya on 23 October 1997.

For five long years, no plane could touch down in Libya because of the embargo [Based on false claims of terrorism as outlined above].

Mandela didn’t mince his words when US President Bill Clinton said the visit was an ‘unwelcome’ one –

‘No country can claim to be the policeman of the world and no state can dictate to another what it should do’, said Mandela. ‘Those that yesterday were friends of our enemies, have the gall today, to tell me not to visit my brother Gaddafi. They are advising us to be ungrateful and forget our friends of the past.’

« Those who say I should not be here are without morals. I am not going to join them in their lack of morality. »

mandelaand%20gaddafi dans Politique/Societe

 

Comment by former Congresswoman

and Green Party Presidential Candidate

Cynthia McKinney

see more on McKinney at the Womens page 

« The reason Muammar Qaddafi is a target is because he has been a thorn in the side of anti-revolutionary forces since he took power in Libya, overthrowing the King and nationalizing the oil industry so that the people could benefit from their oil resources.

Libya’s Revolution brought free health care and education to the people and subsidized housing. In fact, students in Libya can study there or abroad and the government gives them a monthly stipend while they are in school and they pay no tuition. If a Libyan needs a surgery that must be done overseas, then the government will pay for that surgery.

That is more than the soldiers of the United States military can say. While Libyans enjoy subsidized housing, members of the U.S. military risk foreclosure while they serve their country abroad.

Money from oil is directly deposited into the accounts of every Libyan based on oil income. As one Libyan told me recently, the idea is that if people have what they need, then they don’t have to deny rights to or harm others and the Revolution believes that it is the responsibility of the government to provide the basic needs of its citizens.

 

Cynthia McKinney’s role for now is to help shape the debate and I hope the viewer will appreciate her dedication to principle, not skin color.

Below – McKinney on Obama’s Legal Status as

International War Criminal

 

David Icke Newsletter - Comment Aug 27, 2011

Gaddafi was being demonised by the Reagan-Bush Sr. administration (the Rothschilds) in the 1980s when the CIA and Mossad led a campaign to destabilise Libya that mirrors what has happened in 2011.

Newsweek reported on August 3rd, 1981:

« The details of the plan were sketchy, but it seemed to be a classic CIA destabilization campaign. One element was a « disinformation » program designed to embarrass Kaddafi and his government. Another was the creation of a « counter government » to challenge his claim to national leadership. A third – potentially the most risky – was an escalating paramilitary campaign, probably by disaffected Libyan nationals, to blow up bridges, conduct small-scale guerrilla operations and demonstrate that Kaddafi was opposed by an indigenous political force. »

Sound familiar? That was 30 years ago.

But so many people just buy the lie no matter what the era or generation. As Adolf Hitler said: ‘Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.’

And his propaganda chief, Joseph Goebbels, said: ‘The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly – it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over.

Hitler also said, with equal relevance: ‘What luck for the rulers that men do not think.’

NATO planes pepper-bombed Tripoli in support of the ‘rebels’ on the ground. Thousands of the very civilians that the UN resolution said should be protected were killed in the process. But we hear nothing of this in the mainstream media and precious little of the murder and executions of Gaddafi supporters by the ‘rebels’ throughout the conflict and after they entered Tripoli.

The emphasis is always on alleged executions and killings of rebel supporters by Gaddafi’s forces. No doubt some of these claims are true, but where is the balance? There is none, and Syria is now being demonised to go through the same process of demonise, invade, conquer, control.

Richard Haas, president of the Illuminati Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) which directs US foreign policy, has admitted that the NATO bombing of Libya was not about protecting civilians, but removing Gaddafi. He also called for an ‘international force’ to occupy the country and ‘maintain order’.

It is the same rhetoric, the same blueprint, which we have seen in every other country ‘liberated’ by the architects of tyranny. It really is goodbye Libya: rest in peace. The United States and its conscripted NATO allies are not going to walk away and leave Libya to the Libyans. It is an occupation force to pillage the oil resources and the banking system, as it was always going to be.

 

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts comment - Aug 16, 2011

First of all, notice that the protests in Libya are different from the ones in Egypt or Yemen or Bahrain or Tunisia and the difference is that this is an armed rebellion. 

There are more differences: another is that these protests originated in the eastern part of Libya where the oil is – they did not originate in the capital cities. And we have heard from the beginning, credible reports that the CIA is involved in the protests and there have been a large number of press reports that the CIA has sent back to Libya its Libyan asset to head up the Libyan rebellion. 

In my opinion, what this is about is to eliminate China from the Mediterranean. China has extensive energy investments and construction investments in Libya. They are looking to Africa as a future energy source. 

The US is countering this by organizing the United States African Command (USAC), which Qaddafi refused to join. So that’s the second reason for the Americans to want Qaddafi out. 

And the third reason is that Libya controls part of the Mediterranean coast and it’s not in American hands….

Gold Stock Bull .Com - Jason Hamlin May 16, 2011

« Under the guise of “protecting civilians,” the United States led NATO into Libya and is attempting to assassinate the Libyan leader. Of course, Libya happens to be the largest oil producer in Africa , but many do not realize thatGaddafi was planning to introduce the gold dinar, a single African currency that would serve as an alternative to the U.S. dollar and allow African nations to share the wealth.

It is surely no coincidence that Iraq ‘s prior leader, Saddam Hussein, was trying to do the same thing just prior to U.S. invasion for all of those “weapons of mass destruction.”

Simply put, if oil-rich nations begin trading in something other than dollars it will significantly reduce demand for dollars and threaten the dollar’s role as world reserve currency. Many experts belief this would lead to the quick death of the fiat greenback, which is now backed by nothing but faith in a government that is running an annual budget deficit of over $1.5 TRILLION.

 

 

 

denni%20Kucinich

Rep. Dennis Kucinich Aug 26, 2011

« A negotiated settlement in Libya was deliberately avoided for months while NATO, in violation of UN Security Council (UNSC) Resolutions 1970 and 1973, illegally pursued regime change. NATO chose sides, intervened in a civil war and morphed into the air force for the rebels, who could not have succeeded but for NATO’s attacks.

NATO acted with impunity. The NATO command recklessly bombed civilians in the name of saving civilians. »

Comment on Speech

« President Obama’s speech to the nation raised as many questions as it answered. Members of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs were not consulted, but the Arab League was. So was the UN. This is the same UN that applauded Gaddafi’s wild rants in New York just last fall. It is the same body that elected Libya to its Human Rights Council. » - American Thinker Mar 30, 2011

 

Manifesto of Libyan Tribal Council

As NATO and its backers contemplate their End Game they may want to consider some excerpts from the Libyan Tribal Council’s manifesto issued on July 26 2011 Speaking for Libya’s 2000 tribes, the Council issued a Proclamation signed by scores of tribal leaders from eastern Libya. (near Benghazi) .

 By this letter to the extraordinary African Summit, convening in Addis Ababa, the notables of the Eastern tribes of the Great Jamahiriya confirm their complete rejection of what is called the Transitional Council in Benghazi which hasn’t been nominated nor elected by Tribal representatives but rather imposed by NATO .”

 What is called the Transitional Council in Benghazi was imposed by NATO on us and we completely reject it. Is it democracy to impose people with armed power on the people of Benghazi, many of whose leaders who are not even Libyan or from Libyan tribes but come from Tunisia and other countries?

tribal-leaders-libya

 The Tribal Council assures its continuing cooperation with the African Union in its suggestions aimed at helping to prevent the aggression on the Libyan people”.…

 The Tribal Council condemns the crusader aggression on the Great Jamahiriya executed by NATO and the Arabic regressive forces which is a grave threat to Libyan civilians as it continues to kill them as NATO bombs civilian targets .”…

 We do not and will not accept any authority other than the authority that we chose with our free will which is the People’s Congress and Peoples Committees, and the popular social leadership, and will oppose with all available means, the NATO rebels and their slaughter, violence and maiming of cadavers. We intend to oppose with all the means available to us the NATO crusader aggressors and their appointed lackeys ”.

According to one representative of the Libyan Supreme Tribal Council,

The tribes of Libya have until today not fully joined in repelling the NATO aggressors.

As we do, we serve notice to NATO that we shall not desist until they have left our country and we will ensure that they never return .”

 

from http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=26353

30 April 2011: The bombing of the Downs Syndrome School in Tripoli 

30 April 2011: The bombing of a Gaddafi residence, murdering Saif Gaddafi , his friend and 3 Gaddafi children. 

13 May 2011: The murder of 11 Muslim Imams in Brega . 

12 June 2011: The bombing of the University of Tripoli. Death toll not yet established. 

22 July 2011: The bombing of the Great Man made Waterway irrigation system, which supplies most Libyans with their drinking water. 

23 July 2011: The bombing of the factory which makes the pipes for the water system, and the murder of 6 of its employees. 

8th August 2011: The bombing of the Hospital at Zliten . Resulting in the murder of a minimum, of 50 human beings, many of them children. The bombing of hospitals is against all international laws, and a most grievous crime. 

9 August 2011: The bombing of the village of Majer , resulting in the murder of 85 civilians. 33 Children, 32 women and 20 men. 

 

Did NATO Stage the Green Square “Celebration”?

Classé dans : Politique/Societe — uriniglirimirnaglu @ 6 : 35

sur :  http://www.infowars.com/did-nato-stage-the-green-square-celebration/

Fake footage suggests event was another psychological operation like the toppling of the Saddam statue

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Wednesday, August 24, 2011

NATO’s haste to convince Libyans and the watching world that Colonel Gaddafi’s regime had collapsed even as fighting still raged seemingly forced their hand in staging the Green Square “celebration” that was endlessly broadcast by the establishment media to lend the rebel siege on Tripoli a sense of legitimacy.

In fact, what we probably witnessed was a repeat of the Firdos Square farce, the infamous 2003 toppling of a Saddam Hussein statue in Baghdad that was scripted and staged by the Pentagon for mass TV consumption.

The proof can be seen in a comparison of pictures of the event broadcast by Al-Jazeera and genuine photos of Green Square taken before the supposed celebration.

Did NATO Stage the Green Square “Celebration”? dans Politique/Societe small_fakelibyasquare

The buildings in the Al-Jazeera footage are noticeably lacking in details seen in the genuine photos, and look like nothing more than a studio set.

The most obvious discrepancy is the stylized design which appears above the smaller archway in the genuine photos. This is nowhere to be seen in the Al Jazeera clip.

Similarly, above the larger archway on the left side of the genuine photos, there is another ridged design element on the building which is completely different in the Al-Jazeera footage.

The fake scenery has purportedly been set up in Qatar for purposes of psychological manipulation. The Stop War Crimes website also reports that the footage showing victorious rebels in front of Gaddafi’s Bab al-Azizia compound could similarly have been faked.

The fake footage serves two purposes according to the Stop War Crimes blog. “To break the Libyan resistance by creating panic and chaos in the Libyan capital,” and “to provide cover for the massacres of civilians that would occur in the days following the declaration of rebel victory.”

There are conflicting reports about how much territory the rebels actually control. While the establishment media brazenly claimed the rebels controlled virtually all of Tripoli almost instantly, this figure has consistently been revised downward. It would have been necessary to stage victory footage at strategic locations if these victories had never actually occurred.

To be fair, there’s an element of “Baghdad Bob” in the propaganda of both Gaddafi’s forces and NATO, but this wouldn’t be the first time that scenes of jubilation supposedly in response to the fall of a dictator have been staged or misrepresented by the media.

The toppling of the Saddam Hussein statue in Firdos Square in central Baghdad on April 9, 2003 was the creation of an “Army psychological operations team that made it appear to be a spontaneous Iraqi undertaking,” according to the Army’s own internal study of the affair.

Television pictures at the time showed close-up shots of jubilant Iraqis pulling down the statue as reporters from BBC News and other mainstream commentators boldly proclaimed the scene as an iconic moment in modern history, proving that the invasion of Iraq was really about liberating people from a tyrant and not geopolitical conquest.

However, when wide shots of the scene were viewed it became obvious that the event was the work of just a few dozen Iraqis, led by Pentagon stooge Ahmed Chalabi, and not thousands of ordinary Iraqi people as the establishment media claimed at the time.

Given that the siege on Tripoli has been directed primarily by British Special Forces and other NATO commanders, it would be naive to think that psychological operations has not played a significant role in the media’s treatment of unfolding events. Indeed, according to numerous independent journalists on the ground who have been targeted by snipers as well as receiving death threats, there are several MI6 and CIA agents posing as mainstream media reporters.

Truth is always the first casualty of war, and there has been a deliberate propaganda campaign on behalf of NATO forces to pre-empt Gaddafi’s fall from power by using the establishment media to broadcast the end of his regime before it has actually collapsed.

Nowhere was this more evident than when Saif al-Islam Gaddafi appeared in Tripoli to disprove rebel claims that he had been arrested hours earlier, a development that even Senator John McCain called “a PR coup” for Gaddafi’s regime.

Regime change is just as much about media perception as it is about logistics, that’s why the corporate press has been keen to characterize the rebels as glorious freedom fighters when in fact they are being commanded by Al-Qaeda terrorists who have killed U.S. troops.

We won’t see an end to this manipulation even after Gaddafi’s government is eviscerated. The need to bestow artificial legitimacy on the Transitional National Council will ensure the establishment media continues to manufacture fables to re-affirm the myth that the conquest of Libya is anything other than another aggressive act of regime change by globalist powers.

Iraqi Terrorists Exposed as British Government Agent Provocateurs

Classé dans : Politique/Societe — uriniglirimirnaglu @ 6 : 02

Lest we forget who the real Terrorists are… You might recall this incident in Iraq, back in September 2005. It’s a rare instance where the perps of a false flag op were caught red-handed. Every time one hears of “terrorist” bombings in Iraq or Afghanistan, chances are it’s US, Brit, or Mossad agents creating mayhem in order to justify the illegal occupations of these countries. Yet, the sheeple hardly give this a second thought — even after this incident was blown wide open in the MSM (original CNN and Wash. Post reports further below)… From 2005
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The REAL face of “Islamic Terror” – Two SAS agents caught carrying out a false flag terror attack in Basra, Iraq September 20th 2005

britishterrorists.jpgJoe Quinn – Sott.net Sept. 20th 2005
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/220455-Flaming-APCs-Now-There-s-a-Heart-Warming-Story-Just-Don-t-Mention-The-False-Flag

 There is a saying of sorts that, if you are going to do something, do it well, and given the serious consequences, nowhere is that more true than when you plan to engage in criminal activity. Today in Basra, Southern Iraq, two members of the British SAS (Special Air Service) were caught, ‘in flagrante’ as it were, dressed in full “Arab garb”, driving a car full of explosives and shooting and killing two official Iraqi policemenThis fact, finally reported by the mainstream press, goes to the very heart, and proves accurate much of what we have been saying on the Signs of the Times page for several years.

The following are facts, indisputable by all but the most self-deluded:

Number 1:

The US and British invasion of Iraq was not for the purpose of bringing “freedom and democracy” to the Iraqi people, but rather for the purpose of securing Iraq’s oil resources for the US, Israeli and British governments and expanding their control over the greater Middle East.

Number 2:

Both the Bush and Blair governments deliberately fabricated evidence (lied) about the threat the Saddam posed to the west and his links to the mythical ‘al-Qaeda’ in order to justify their invasion.

Number 3:

Dressed as Arabs, British (and CIA and Israeli) ‘special forces’ have been carrying out fake ‘insurgent’ attacks, including ‘car suicide bombings’ against Iraqi policemen and Iraqi civilians (both Sunni and Shia) for the past two years. Evidence would suggest that these tactics are designed to provide continued justification for a US and British military presence in Iraq and to ultimately embroil the country in a civil war that will lead to the breakup of Iraq into more manageable ‘statelets’, much to the joy of the Israeli right and their long-held desire for the establishment of biblical ‘greater Israel’

Coming not long after the botched London bombings carried out by British MI5 where an eyewitness reported that the floor of one of the trains had been blown inwards (how can a bomb in a backpack or on a “suicide bomber” inside the train ever produce such an effect), more than anything else today’s event in Basra highlights the desperation that is driving the policy-makers in the British government.

British intelligence would do well to think twice about carrying out any more ‘false flag’ operations until they can achieve the ‘professionalism’ of the Israeli Mossad — they always make it look convincing and rarely suffer the ignominy of being caught in the act and having the faces of their erstwhile “terrorists” plastered across the pages of the mainstream media.
 

 

Official: British troops freed in jailbreak

CNN
2005/09/20
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/09/19/iraq.main/index.html 

BAGHDAD, Iraq — A British armored vehicle escorted by a tank crashed into a detention center Monday in Basra and rescued two undercover troops held by police, an Iraqi Interior Ministry official told CNN.

British Defense Ministry Secretary John Reid confirmed two British military personnel were “released,” but he gave no details on how they were freed.

In a statement released in London, Reid did not say why the two had been taken into custody. But the Iraqi official, who spoke to CNN on condition of anonymity, said their arrests stemmed from an incident earlier in the day.

The official said two unknown gunmen in full Arabic dress began firing on civilians in central Basra, wounding several, including a traffic police officer. There were no fatalities, the official said.

The two gunmen fled the scene but were captured and taken in for questioning, admitting they were British marines carrying out a “special security task,” the official said.

British troops launched the rescue about three hours after Iraqi authorities informed British commanders the men were being held at the police department’s major crime unit, the official said.

Iraqi police said members of Iraq’s Mehdi Army militia engaged the British forces around the facility, burning one personnel carrier and an armored vehicle.

Video showed dozens of Iraqis surrounding British armored vehicles and tossing gasoline bombs, rocks and other debris at them.

With one vehicle engulfed in flames, a soldier opened the hatch and bailed out as rocks were thrown at him. Another photograph showed a British soldier on fire on top of a tank.

“Many of those present were clearly prepared well in advance to cause trouble, and we believe that the majority of Iraq people would deplore this violence,” Reid said. [...]

 

From the Washington Post
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/19/AR2005091900572_2.html?nav=rss_world>

 


Iraqi security officials on Monday variously accused the two Britons they detained of shooting at Iraqi forces or trying to plant explosives. Photographs of the two men in custody showed them in civilian clothes.

When British officials apparently sought to secure their release, riots erupted. Iraqi police cars circulated downtown, calling through loudspeakers for the public to help stop British forces from releasing the two. Heavy gunfire broke out and fighting raged for hours, as crowds swarmed British forces and set at least one armored vehicle on fire.

Witnesses said they saw Basra police exchanging fire with British forces. Sadr’s Mahdi Army militia joined in the fighting late in the day, witnesses said. A British military spokesman, Darren Moss, denied that British troops were fighting Basra police.

 

From ChinaView
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-09/19/content_3514065.htm>  (orginally pooled from the BBC)

 


Iraqi police detained two British soldiers in civilian clothes in the southern city Basra for firing on a police station on Monday, police said.

“Two persons wearing Arab uniforms opened fire at a police station in Basra. A police patrol followed the attackers and captured them to discover they were two British soldiers,” an Interior Ministry source told Xinhua.

The two soldiers were using a civilian car packed with explosives, the source said. He added that the two were being interrogated in the police headquarters of Basra.

The British forces informed the Iraqi authorities that the two soldiers were performing an official duty, the source said. British military authorities said they could not confirm the incident but investigations were underway.

 

~ by Eric Harrington on January 3, 2011.

2 Responses to “Iraqi Terrorists Exposed as British Government Agent Provocateurs”

  1. So…yeah, what DID happen to these guys in the end ? They were pulled out/rescued (“rescued”) and lived to meddle another day ?

    Why can’t I find any speculation (past 2005 when the incident took place) in reputable and more well-known news sources, why no follow-up on this story ? It was intriguing (and embarrassing for the Brit government, whether these guys had gone rogue or simply messed up in getting caught during a sanctioned mission), so you’d think it would’ve sparked more interest and been kept on people’s radar.

    Weeeeird.

  2. Because everything that goes against the official story is immediately labeled “Conspiracy Theory” and every journalist knows promoting such issues is career suicide. It would be one thing if it was a slam dunk story. But they never are. They require digging and in Iraq, digging into such matters could be a fast track to a IED. These guys don’t play fair..

Partenaires et Soutiens officiels de la présidence française du G20 et du G8

Classé dans : Politique/Societe — uriniglirimirnaglu @ 3 : 10

g8etg20france2011.jpg

extrait du site : http://www.g20-g8.com/g8-g20/g20/francais/le-sommet-2011/partenaires/partenaires.30.html

Partenaires officiels de la présidence française du G20 et du G8

partenairesofficielsg8etg20france2011.jpg

  

Soutiens officiels de la présidence française du G20 et du G8

soutiensofficielsg8etg20france20111.jpg

soutiensofficielsg8etg20france20112.jpg

¤ Morgellons: Maladie mystérieuse avec fibres indestructibles en prime

Classé dans : Chemtrails et pluies de fils/fibres/etc... — uriniglirimirnaglu @ 2 : 32

MARDI 18 OCTOBRE 2011

sur : http://rlqqnl.blogspot.com/2011/10/maladie-des-morgellons-maladie.html

 

¤ Morgellons: Maladie mystérieuse avec fibres indestructibles en prime dans Chemtrails et pluies de fils/fibres/etc... 20111017-232919-g

WOW!!!!  Une première dans un journal purement québécois.   Le problème, c’est qu’ils ont les yeux fermés bien dur.  Ils ne mentionnent aucunement les chemtrails. Maudit, qu’ils sont niaiseux! 


Lolo


TVA nouvelles   2011/10/17/ 23 :29 :19


Une mystérieuse maladie de la peau, aux symptômes semblant sortir tout droit d’un film d’horreur, plonge des milliers de personnes dans un cauchemar auquel les scientifiques ne semblent être en mesure de mettre fin.


Répertorier au Canada, aux États-Unis, en Australie et en Europe, la maladie des Morgellons se distingue par des symptômes peu habituels.


Ainsi, la personne atteinte aura la sensation d’avoir des insectes ou des vers qui rampent sous sa peau, des éruptions cutanées qui démangent et qui laissent des lésions importantes, en plus de problèmes de mémoire et de concentration.


À cela s’ajoute l’éruption de mystérieuses fibres qui sortent du corps. Ces bouts de fils, qui ont fait l’objet d’études à l’Université de l’Oklahoma, mystifient les experts.


En effet, ces derniers ne sont pas parvenus à établir une correspondance avec les 800 fibres textiles qui sont commercialisées ou les 85 000 composés organiques connus.


Ces fibres, qui sont rouges, bleues et noires, luisent sous les ultraviolets et sont d’une résistance déconcertante : même après avoir été chauffée à 600 degrés Celsius, elles ne brûlent pas.


La communauté scientifique demeure perplexe et plusieurs pensent qu’il s’agit d’un délire de parasitose.


Mais des associations de malades ont vu le jour, notamment au Canada, et veulent des réponses claires.


C’est le cas de la chanteuse et artiste-peintre Joni Mitchell qui en est atteinte.


Si bien qu’aux États-Unis, le Center for Disease Control a mis sur pied un groupe d’experts pour enquêter sur ce syndrome affolant.


Une maladie qui, aux yeux de bien des médecins, n’existe que dans la tête des malades.


***


 Oui, tu as bien raison. Ils sont niaiseux. Et c’est le moins qu’on puisse dire. Maintenant   qu’ils parlent d’une maladie é p o u v a n t a b l e (mais il y en plusieurs autres, la sclérose en plaques, notamment), ne t’en fais pas, ils vont bien finir par être obligés de se mettre la tête dedans. Et de prononcer enfin le mot maudit:CHEMTRAILS (Lire en français: traînées chimiques).  Merci. 

May 
***
N.B. Les deux liens ci-dessous ont été supprimés par TVA nouvelles
http://tvanouvelles.ca/lcn/lebuzz/archives/2011/10/20111017-232919.html

Mystérieuses fibres qui sortent du corps: maladie ou…

Dernière mise à jour:  3 novembre 2011

Mais l’un d’entre eux a été retracé grâce à  Jaba

Merci Jaba pour ce lien devenu si précieux … !!! 
Je ne crois pas que nous allons le perdre, cette fois-ci. 
May
 

21 commentaire(s):

Lolo a dit…

Je leur ai finalement envoyé ton petit texte sur les chemtrails afin d’éclairer leurs lanternes en mentionnant que peut-être il y avait un certain rapport.
J’espère qu’il va y avoir un journaliste parmi les milliers qui va s’ouvrir les yeux.

18 octobre 2011 09:56
May West a dit…

Une vraie Lucky Luke …! 
Tu tires plus vite que ton ombre. 
Wow! 

May

18 octobre 2011 10:41
Anonyme a dit…

Tous les articles qui portaient sur ce sujets ne sont plus aucunement accessibles et ont été retirés?? Bizarre!

Cath

18 octobre 2011 15:11
Anonyme a dit…

maintenant les liens suivants n’existent plys:

http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5igbUQzdKO-I0ubuSC71_y-YozAHw

http://tvanouvelles.ca/lcn/lebuzz/archives/2011/10/20111017-232919.html

http://lejournaldemontreal.canoe.ca/journaldemontreal/actualites/sante/archives/2011/10/20111018-020737.html

Pourquoi tous effacés? Câlisse.

18 octobre 2011 17:02
Anonyme a dit…

j`ai bien l`impression qu`il nous cachent plusieur choses c`est temps çi!!

18 octobre 2011 18:57
Lolo a dit…

Ben oui maudite marde, il ne reste que le lien http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5igbUQzdKO-I0ubuSC71_y-YozAHw.

Tu parles d’une affaire, pour moi ils ont eu vraiment peur des retombés gouvernementales vu que c’est top-secret. Avec tous les internautes qu’ils leur donnaient des informations, ils ont dû s’apercevoir que le sujet était assez corsé.
Je suis certaine que je ne suis pas la seule qui a écrit un commentaire en les référant aux chemtrails.

18 octobre 2011 18:58
Anonyme a dit…

ca peu venir d’une autre planete, sa résiste a nos métodes de désinfection.

18 octobre 2011 19:53
Anonyme a dit…

Pour Tva a retiré les nouvelles qui en parlent ??? C’est vraiment louche ! :O On a été modifié génétiquement par des extra terrestres qui veulent nous coloniser !!!!!!!!!

18 octobre 2011 20:18
Anonyme a dit…

mon ami à reçu un météorite sur ses terre et dit que dans certain morceaux de celui-ci avait des petits (insectes) avec des oeufs qui résiste aussi a la chaleur (torche propane).. avec tout les météorite qui tombent c`est temps çi, cette maladie arriverais peut-être de là!!???

18 octobre 2011 21:20
Katryn a dit…

Je suis allée sur TVA nouvelle et TVA Trois-Rivières (sur Facebook) pour parler de leur reportage qui a mystérieusement disparu sur la mystérieuse maladie ! Allez-y tous pour que ca ne passe pas dans le beurre c’est trop louche tout ça ! :)

19 octobre 2011 10:19
Anonyme a dit…

C’est à cause du vaccin H1N1 !!!!!!!!!!!

19 octobre 2011 11:23
Anonyme a dit…

J’aime bien comment tu reproche aux gouvernements de cacher des choses et qu’en même temps tu supprimes les commentaires qui ne te plaisent pas…

19 octobre 2011 12:01
Lolo a dit…

Voici le commentaire que j’ai envoyé à TVA hier matin.
Bonjour,
Suite à votre reportage Maladie des Morgellons
Maladie mystérieuse avec fibres indestructibles en prime

Je me permets de vous envoyer quelques sites qui pourraient peut-être éclairer vos lanternes.

J’imagine que vous connaissez l’existence des «chemtrails», ces traînées de fumée blanche rejetées par des avions modifiés, partout dans le monde à diverses altitudes et cela depuis des décennies. Sans oublier, aussi et surtout, dans toutes les régions du Québec dès qu’on lève la tête vers ciel, comme encore presque chaque jour à Rosemère, dans le comté des Laurentides … ! 

Alors voilà. Jusqu’à aujourd’hui, on en parlait peu. Le mot est-il même dans les dictionnaires? 
Mais heureusement qu’on commence à le trouver de plus en plus sur Internet! 

Mais quel diable se cache donc dans les détails, les médias officiels, eux, ignorent ou feignent d’ignorer depuis toujours le sujet? Mystère! 

Cependant deux questions qui tuent se posent : 
Qui a décidé de cela?
Et dans quel but? 

On ne veut pas créer un climat de panique, mais à tout le moins informer la population de la chose et invitant les gens à regarder plus souvent vers le ciel, de sorte qu’ils soient sensibilisés à ce mystère et cherchent à en connaître davantage. 

Oui, à notre avis il serait important que l’on s’intéresse au dossier.

Ne serait-ce que de commencer à dépouiller – mine de rien – le terme «chemtrails» de ses noirs secrets.
Voici quelques liens : 

http://dai.ly/pZ9CBq

http://dai.ly/h1Ib7x

http://actu-chemtrails.over-blog.com/

http://realinfos.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/chemtrails-et-morgellons-du-nouveau/

19 octobre 2011 14:18
May West a dit…

D’abord, j’aimerais te remercier, Lolo, d’avoir porté à mon attention ce buzz sur la maladie des Morgellons qu’on relie de près ou de loin à l’épandage des traînées chimiques. 

Et que TVA nouvelles ait pris la décision de supprimer ses propres informations, écrites et télévisuelles, comme toi et plusieurs autres personnes ici, moi aussi je trouve ça très étrange. 

Mais qu’on le veuille ou non, les chemtrails existent et sont bien réels, car on les voit à l’oeil nu partout au-dessus de nos têtes, non seulement dans plusieurs régions du Québec, mais partout dans le monde. Et inutile de dire que c’est ce qu’ils contiennent et nous tombent dessus, sur nous-mêmes, nos plantes, nos forêts, nos sols, nos animaux, etc, qui nous inquiète.

Bref, toute cette saga des Morgellons sur TVA nouvelles et aussitôt lâchement étouffée m’amène à regretter une chose. Que personne n’y ait pensé avant aujourd’hui, puisque que le sujet des chemtrails et leurs noirs secrets auraient dû faire partie des causes importantes à défendre, par les Indignés sans cause précise lors de la manifestation Occupons Montréal, samedi dernier. 

À mon avis, il s’agit d’une question de survie pour l’humanité aussi importante sinon plus que la crise économique mondiale. 

Tout cela étant dit, hélas! ce sujet-là est tellement tabou actuellement que plus on cherche à connaître l’heure juste, plus on nous rejette dans la fosse aux conspirations. 

Mais ne perdons pas espoir et continuons le débat. 

May

19 octobre 2011 19:11
Dji a dit…

Ma mere m’en a parlée ce soir et suite a son « délire » (elle regardait la télé seule pendant que mon pere dormait sur son fauteuil juste à côté) je croyais qu’elle avait rêvée mais suite a mes recherches toutes les sources de cette nouvelle viennent de… (suspence)Quebecor Media (qui a vraiment « wipé » le web de toutes traces de cette nouvelle.
Un gros merci a votre équipe pour garder la nouvelle en vie dû au retrait du groupe Quebecor Media

19 octobre 2011 22:43
elle_20 a dit…

Domage cette histoire risque de tomber dans l’oubli… Vous souvenez-vous de ces animaux qui mourraient par milier il y a quelques mois? Tombr dans l’oubli et oui! La même choses se fera ici malheusement… J’ai écris sur la page de TVA hier dans la section votre avis…Aucune réponse… en plus, lorsqu je postais le lien du reportage il se supprimais presque instatanément… ont me prend presque pour une folle d’avoir vue ca, (sur tva canoé la presse etc) parceque nulle part sur les sites de nouvelles ont le mentionne…

20 octobre 2011 18:36
May West a dit…

À vous deux, elle_20 et Dji, et à toutes les autres personnes qui nous ont visitées ces derniers jours, oui, vous avez raison, c’est très probable que cette affaire finisse dans la poubelle de l’Histoire. 

Mais l’aspect positif toutefois est porteur d’espoir. Vous avez appris certaines choses que vous ignoriez peut-être avant, et pas seulement à propos de la maladie des Morgellons, dont je soupçonne TVA d’avoir voulu verser dans le spectaculaire avec ce coup-là, mais aussi et surtout à propos des chemtrails. À mon sens, ils ont commencé à l’envers. Ils auraient dû parler des chemtrails d’abord. 

Par contre, cela vous amènera, j’en suis certaine, à regarder le ciel au-dessus de vos têtes plus souvent et à vérifier par vous-mêmes ce que ma soeur et moi-même ont voulu vous faire comprendre à travers toute cette saga. Et que cela vous pousse à en connaître davantage sur le sujet, sera notre récompense. 

Merci d’être là. On apprécie beaucoup.

May

20 octobre 2011 19:51
Patrice Bélanger a dit…

J’ai cette maladie, les fibres brûles et cette maladie ne vient pas directement des chemtrails mais du fait que ces épandages qui en passant servent pour rendre l’air conductible pour le radar militaire 3D de l’armée, aseptisent l’air qui la rende sujette a développer ce genre de super champignon. Le problème est suvent causé par un parasite qui attaque l’humain nouvellement, la douve du foie, additionné par une piqure de tique. Tout ceci amène le foie a ne plus tenir le PH de la peau de façon optimale et ce genre de fibre surgit. On retrouve comme responsable la chlamydia pneumonique, la babesiose et la Borrelia burgdorferi (maladie de Lyme). Comme au Canada le cartel phamaceutique est trop fort, ils préfère faire ce genre de propagande pour ne pas traiter les gens convenablement préférant vendre des crèmes comme A-Derma a l’infini a ces patients qui est plus payants aux médecins commissionnaires et ces compagnies quand ce n’est pas pour faire passer les patients pour fou… Les tests de médecines conventionnelles ne détecte aucune de ces maladies, ni plus que le test de lyme utilisé au canada…

22 octobre 2011 12:41
Anonyme a dit…

je suis bouche B . j’aurais bien aimé voir la vidéo de TVA. mais je suis tombé sur ça sur YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGNyHLv-xyg , on vois que c’est bizar

24 octobre 2011 18:58
henri weemaels a dit…

Ola,
Oui le morgellon est une maladie très controversé mais bien réelle.
Moi aussi j’en souffre comme Patrice depuis plus de 7 ans. C’est mon épouse qui a été contaminée. Les problémes de santé physique et mentale peuvent être énormes avec cette saloperie. Elle améne une quadruple infection : bactéries , virus , fungus et insectes. Ces organismes « normalement » n’ infectent pas l’ humain.
A ce jour , il n’y a aucun moyen de savoir ni d’où elle vient ni comment elle se propage. Il y aurait transformation de l’adn ( via agrobactérium) Autrement dit : une belle merde. Et dire que la médecine traditionnelle refuse de considérer cette maladie comme réelle…simplement car quand ils cherchent avec leurs méthodes habituelles , ils ne trouvent rien d’anormal…. et donc « c’est dans votre tête mr, mme !
Savent ils le mal qu’ils font ainsi par leur manque de d’éthique, de compétences, d’intéret, de compassion ?
Les personnes atteintes du morgellon ont tous la même histoire : incompréhension et rejet par la médecine, souffrances physiques et psychiques , isolement et chute sociale, difficultés avec l’entourage pouvant aller jusqu’a la rupture… 
Merci pour votre article et bonne route à vous tous.

26 octobre 2011 05:13

Jaba a dit…

http://conxientia.fr/non-classe/morgellon-joni-mitchell-tva-censure-5130


;)

3 novembre 2011 06:23

Une pause café - Une person... |
LE TECHNICIEN DU RISQUE |
Sauvons les animaux |
Unblog.fr | Annuaire | Signaler un abus | Vues de Babi
| Mouvement Citoyen Chrétien
| CRC-PHONE IMPACT EXPERT