• Accueil
  • > Recherche : russia today success

16 mars 2014

¤ Disparition du Boeing de Malaysia Airlines : survol à basse altitude des Maldives et atterrissage secret sur l’île base US de Diego Garcia ?

Classé dans : Outils/Bon à savoir,Politique/Societe — uriniglirimirnaglu @ 11 : 36

Source : Agoravox, article d’Ariane Walter intitulé « Malaisya Airlines : Vingt ingénieurs de « Freescale » à bord », avec ses commentaires (version du dimanche 16 mars 2014 à 10h15)

avec une mise à jour du 24 mars 2014 car un article de croah.fr (http://croah.fr/corbeau-dechaine/boeing-777-lavion-aurait-survole-les-iles-maldives/) indique que le Boeing (dont on nous dit désormais qu’il s’est abîmé dans l’océan indien au nord-ouest de l’Australie) aurait été vu survolant une des îles Maldives à très basse altitude… Or la ligne qui va des Maldives au supposé point de chute dans la mer passe au dessus de… l’île US de Diego Garcia…! D’ailleurs on apprend aussi que l’aéroport de cette île était tout comme celui des Maldives programmé dans le simulateur de vol du pilote… http://www.lesechos.fr/entreprises-secteurs/auto-transport/actu/0203380158047-boeing-disparu-le-simulateur-de-vol-du-pilote-livre-ses-premiers-secrets-657795.php

et toujours avec une mise à jour du 22 mars 2014 grâce à un article de Minurne Résistance daté du 21 mars 2014 : « VOL MH370 : UNE AUTRE HYPOTHESE ? (par Maurice D.)« , selon lequel un brevet a été déposé par Freescale et … quatre des passagers de l’avion disparu… quatre jours après leur disparition… !!!

Extrait de l’article : « Quatre jours après la disparition de l’avion, le Bureau international des brevets en a enregistré un, pris par un groupe de scientifiques, quatre Chinois tous originaires de Suzhou, une ville située près de Shangaï et un Américain, chacun en détenant 20 % : Peidong Wang, Zhijun Chen, Zhihong Chen, Li Yin et… Freescale semiconductor d’Austin au Texas. Quatre individus et une société. Or, coïncidence nous dira-t-on, mais il n’y aura que les idiots et les naïfs pour le croire, il y avait justement à bord du vol MH370 toute une équipe de Chinois et de Malais se rendant à Pékin « pour affaires », dont Wang, les deux Chen, Yin et des cadres de Freescale (voir le lien en fin d’article). Au total une vingtaine de personnes, rien que des ingénieurs et des cadres supérieurs. Car le brevet en question intéresse énormément les Chinois en train de faire un effort de guerre considérable pour développer leur marine autant que leur aviation. »

Malaisya Airlines : Vingt ingénieurs de « Freescale » à bord

¤ Disparition du Boeing de Malaysia Airlines : survol à basse altitude des Maldives et atterrissage secret sur l'île base US de Diego Garcia ? dans Outils/Bon à savoir malaysia-8ab63 Il y avait donc vingt employés du groupe Freescale à bord du Boeing 777 de la Malaysia Airlines. Ils étaient en route pour une réunion d’affaire en Chine.C’est le PDG du groupe, Greg Loewe, qui l’a annoncé dans un communiqué précisant que douze d’entre eux étaient de nationalité malaisienne, huit de nationalité chinoiseFreescale Semiconductor est une firme basée à Austin. Elle dispose d’une équipe de spécialistes dédiée à l’appui aux forces de défense. Les produits commerciaux de Freescale couvrent divers secteurs : -Les Communications sur le champ de bataille -L’avionique -Les bandes radar HF par L et S -Le guidage des missiles -La guerre électronique -L’identification, ami ou ennemi (IFF ) OK…Personne n’en parle dans les media mainstream. Est-on là au cœur des raisons de cette disparition ? il paraît évident que ce ne sont pas des laveurs de vitres qui faisaient ce voyage mais des ingénieurs de haut niveau.Alors ?Les chroniques de Rorschach approfondissent ainsi le sujet :« Concernant le mystère du vol MH370, deux informations importantes n’ont pas été diffusées. 1)- A l’aide de l’armement électronique d’aujourd’hui, un avion peut sembler disparaître. 2) Les vingt passagers de Freesacle sont liés à des contractants US de la Défense dans le domaine de l’armement électronique high tech. Les capacités de la guerre électronique comprennent des armes qui permettent de cacher des avions. Cet armement électronique est non seulement disponible, il est d’ores et déjà en cours de déploiement. A-t-il été utilisé pour masquer ou camoufler l’avion disparu ? » Mais voyons ce que sont ces nouvelles techniques : « De nouvelles armes électroniques permettent le brouillage , l’aveuglement , l’assourdissement et plus encore, de sorte qu’un avion pourrait disparaître des radars de détection tandis que les systèmes de sécurité ne seraient pas activés . Au niveau du radar les stratégies de contre-mesures électroniques basiques utilisées dans la guerre électronique sont : 1 ) les interférences radar 2 ) la modification des cibles 3 ) la modification des propriétés électriques de l’air . Par exemple, un rapport d’évaluation du renseignement américain a conclu qu’une attaque israélienne contre l’Iran irait bien au-delà des frappes aériennes avec des avions de combat et verrait probablement le déploiement d’armes électroniques contre le réseau électrique, l’Internet, les réseaux de téléphonie mobile ainsi que les fréquences d’urgence utilisées par les premiers secours en Iran. Autre exemple, Israël a développé une arme capable d’imiter un signal de maintenance qui commande au réseau des portables de  » se mettre en veille  » stoppant ainsi efficacement les transmissions. En 2007, l’armée syrienne a obtenu un avant-goût de cette guerre quand les radars de défense aérienne du pays ont étés leurrés par les forces Israéliennes. Dans un premier temps, elles ont fait en sorte qu’ils ne montrent aucun avion dans le ciel puis l’instant d’après, elles ont fait en sorte que les radars montrent des centaines d’avions. L’année dernière, il a été annoncé que la nouvelle technologie de la furtivité des avions les rend invisible non seulement au radar mais également à l’œil humain à la manière d’une cape d’invisibilité.  » A-t-on à faire à un détournement fait pour éliminer ou capturer ces cerveaux ?Ce matin un nouvel élement, révélé par le Nouvel Obs, rend cette thèse possible : Deux sources proches de l’enquête ont indiqué à Reuters que des données radar suggèrent que le vol MH370, qui a disparu samedi sans laisser de traces, a été délibérément orienté vers les îles Andaman,. Un avion non identifié qui pourrait être le Boeing 777 en question suivait un cap défini par des « waypoints », ce qui suppose que quelqu’un ayant des compétences en matière de pilotage se trouvait aux commandes lorsqu’il a été repéré pour la dernière fois par des radars militaires au large de la côte nord-ouest de la Malaisie, dit-on de mêmes sources. Tout ceci n’est-il pas su depuis longtemps par les différents gouvernements. ? Pourquoi perdre du temps à chercher des débris qui n’existent pas ? Y a-t-il des négociations secrètes ? A-t-on sacrifié 219 passagers pour éliminer 20 savants ? Ou a-t-on enlevé 20 cerveaux pour utiliser leurs connaissances ? Que sont devenus les autres passagers ? (more…)

9 octobre 2012

¤ A la base militaire de « Porton Down », on a « enfumé » les anglais pendant cinquante ans !

Classé dans : Chemtrails et pluies de fils/fibres/etc...,Etrange,Outils/Bon à savoir — uriniglirimirnaglu @ 3 : 25

Tested to destruction

In 1953, British servicemen volunteered for what they thought were harmless scientific experiments. Instead, they became unwitting participants in the military’s race to beat the Soviet Union in the development of chemical warfare. This week, police announced the first investigation into the death of one young airman who was gassed to death. Rob Evans reports on the human guinea pigs of the cold war

Inquiry into nerve gas cover-up
Defence Evaluation Research Agency homepage

Porton Down

Ronnie Maddison thought he was helping the nation find a cure for the common cold. That was what many servicemen who answered the appeals to take part in experiments at Porton Down thought they were volunteering for. It was 1953, the middle of the cold war, and the military had little interest in telling them any different.

So when the scientists put out the call for 140 human « guinea pigs » between April 25 and June 5, Ronnie signed up. At 10.17am on May 6 he found himself sitting in a sealed chamber with five other men in Porton Down. Scientists then dripped liquid gas from pipettes through two layers of military clothing on to his skin. At 10.40 he « complained of feeling ‘queer’ and was seen to be sweating », according to official reports obtained by the Guardian. (more…)

4 novembre 2011

Obama’s « Attack Libya » Speech Mar 29, 2011

Classé dans : Politique/Societe — uriniglirimirnaglu @ 6 : 45

sur : http://www.afterenlightenment.net/obama.htm

A Study in Mind Control by Ray Songtree

Transcript of Speech

The Libya Speech by President Obama on Mar 29, 2011 was a mind control tool to hypnotize Americans into believing that crime is justice. He will change the English language so that fair is crooked and crooked is fair. He will again and again propagandize the listener with the following programming…

1. Heroic troops should feel proud no matter what they are told to do.

2. USA has « world community » support (lie will be repeated 27 times). We can examine if this is the fact.

3. Gaddafi is bad man who committed atrocities against civilians (framing and slander will be repeated 34 times). We can find out if this is true.

4. USA is Savior that protects innocent people.(will be repeated 32 times) . We can review what is actually happening.

5. The infamous hope mantra from Obama 2008 campaign. (9 times)

« Good evening. Tonight, I’d like to update the American people on the international [fake coalition, start count 1] effort that we have led in Libya – what we have done, what we plan to do, and why this matters to us. [As the story unfolds, it becomes increasingly difficult to identify 'us'?]

I want to begin by paying tribute to our men and women in uniform [He will repeat this as mind control method...In fact all of his speeches have this programming as have past presidents. It is ongoing mind programming.] who, once again, have acted with courage, professionalism and patriotism. They have moved with incredible speed and strength. [The military acted with speed in 2003 where no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq. Should we assume their action now is more justified?] Because of them and our dedicated diplomats, a coalition [2nd] has been forged and countless lives have been saved. [the great Savior 1st] Meanwhile, as we speak, our troops are supporting our ally Japan, [See Fukushima HAARP attack on HAARP Page ] leaving Iraq to its people [See Veterans Page ], stopping the Taliban’s momentum in Afghanistan…

 

Early in 2008, the Atlantic Council released a report over the signature of its chairman, retired U.S. Marine Gen. James L. Jones that began,

« Make no mistake: NATO is not winning in Afghanistan….  » If that report were released in summer 2010, it could easily read: « Make no mistake: we are losing in Afghanistan…  »

After a firestorm of protest from Brussels,

the word « NATO » was changed to « the international community. »

and going after al Queda around the globe. [There never was an al Queda.Radical Islamists were funded by CIA to create an ‘enemy’ to justify ‘war on terror’ so USA would have excuse for world wide aggression.] As Commander-in-Chief, [Savior 2] I am grateful to our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, Coast Guardsmen, and their families, as are all Americans. [Heroes 2] 

For generations, the United States of America has played a unique role as an anchor of global security [obey or else] and advocate for human freedom[where?]. Mindful of the risks and costs of military action, we are naturally reluctant to use force to solve the world’s many challenges [but US starts wars more than any other country so is US reluctant?  How does force solve challenges?]. But when our interests [$] and values [me first] are at stake, we have a responsibility to act. That is what happened in Libya over the course of these last six weeks. [Obama started a war without Congressional approval.  This is what happened. But General Wesley Clark says it was already awritten plan in 2001, so the Libya war plan was developed even before that.

 

 

Therefore, Bush and Obama are just puppets of something much bigger that spans administrations. One thread is the Council of Foreign Relations, a heavily funded Rockefeller think tank. See Rockefeller quote middle of Home Page.

Below we listen to Obama’s Secretary of State HIllary Clinton describe the relationship between the Dept of State of the United States, and this privately funded organization CFR.

 


that had been choking off towns and cities and we cut off much of their source of supply.
 [whose supply? The roads that feed the general populace of Libya?] And tonight, I can report that we have stopped [savior 13] Gaddafi’s deadly advance. [smear 17 He has made Gaddafi sound like an invader in his own land, double speak. And as the following months after this March Speech showed, Obama did not stop the legitimate Government of Libya until 8000 sorties had destroyed country.]


In this effort, the United States has not acted alone.
 [He just said it was his decision]  Instead, we have been joined [USA wasn’t joined by anyone, it already funds and directs NATO] by a strong and growing coalition. [fake coalition 8] This includes our closest allies – nations like France, UK Canada Denmark, Norway, Italy, Spain, Greece, and Turkey– all of whom have fought by our side for decades. [Its called NATO. This is the big « international coalition » who helps USA invade countries like Iraq and Afghanistan for share of spoils] And it includes Arab partners like Qatar and the United Arab Emerates, who have chosen to meet their responsibility [their responsibility as tiny minions to go along with Empire] to defend [savior 13] the Libyan people. [In double talk, defend means attack] 

To summarize, then: in just one month, the United States has worked with our international partners 
[NATO, fake coalition 8] to mobilize a broad coalition [ It's called NATO. Fake coalition 9. So the international partners mobilized international partners], secure [push through UN] an international[fake coalition 10] mandate [It was no mandate, because China, Russia, Brazil, India and Germany abstained. These countries themselves have 50% of world population, and then we can add all of Africa. Why there was no veto will need to be examined in the coming Crimes against Humanity Trials] to protect [savior 14]civilians, stop an advancing army [smear 18 advancing in their own country?] , prevent a massacre [smear 19], and establish a No Fly Zone with our allies[NATO] and partners [NATO. Fake coalition 11 What partners are not NATO that could establish a No Fly Zone?].

« Putin said NATO went beyond the UN’s March 16th mandate when it dropped guided missiles on Gaddafi’s government offices in Tripoli. “What kind of no-fly zone is this if they are striking palaces every night?” Putin said in Ria Novosti. “What do they need to bomb palaces for? To drive out the mice?” Putin even went as far as suggesting that Libya’s oil resources were a main object for NATO’s interest in Libya. » [went as far in suggesting?]

UK to expel five Libyan diplomats March 30th, 2011 LONDON (BNO NEWS) — British Foreign Secretary William Hague on Wednesday announced that the United Kingdom (UK) will be expelling five Libyan diplomats, who “pose a threat to our security.”

May 1, 2011 Britain announced Sunday it would expel Libya’s ambassador after the UK’s embassy was attacked in Tripoli. The attacks came just hours after a NATO airstrike killed Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi’s youngest son late on Saturday.

SAS troopers help co-ordinate rebel attacks in Libya

The Guardian has learned that a number of serving British special forces soldiers, as well as former SAS troopers, are advising and training rebel forces, although their presence is officially denied.

The Guardian has previously reported the presence of former British special forces troops, now employed by private security companies and funded by a number of sources, including Qatar. They have been joined by a number of serving SAS soldiers.


Our most effective alliance, NATO, has taken command of the enforcement of the arms embargo and No Fly Zone. 
[So Americans, don't worry about this anymore, it is in someone else's hands.] [and food embargo?] Last night, NATO decided to take on the additional responsibility of protecting [savior 17 strangling] Libyan civilians. [He means the mercenaries, because the water system and power of the civilians was taken out by bombing, so NATO has no interest in protecting civilians]

US Led NATO Bombs Water Facilities in Libya

Posted on July 25, 2011 by Rick Bronson

New reports coming out of Libya depict a NATO move towards genocide.  Libya is in a desert and the US led NATO is now bombing not only water facilities, but factories that produce water pipesneeded to replace those destroyed by the bombs.  4.5 million Libyans are facing the prospect of having no drinking water .  And remember these bombings are supposedly being conducted as a form of humanitarian aid designed to save the lives of innocents.

This transfer from the United States to NATO will take place on Wednesday. Going forward, the lead in enforcing the No Fly Zone [this is now double speak term for nightly bombing of ground targets and use of drones]and protecting [savior 18] civilians on the ground will transition to our allies and partners [fake coalition 14. He means our European minions] , and I [savior 19] am fully confident that our [possessive pronoun] coalition [fake coalition 15] will keep the pressure on Gaddafi’s remaining [would that be the armed civilians? The freedom fighters who will be called Gaddafi loyalists.] forces. In that effort, the United States will play a supporting role – including intelligence [managing everything], logistical support [transporting everything],search and rescue assistance [for our CIA and NATO assets], and capabilities to jam regime communications. [Destroy communication for citizens of Libya] Because of this transition to a broader, NATO-based coalition [fake coalition 16. It is called NATO], the risk and cost of this operation – to our military, and to American taxpayers – will be reduced significantly. [Americas are getting a bargain! And how much has it cost so far Mr. President?]

Libya war costs US taxpayers $2m a day and still no Gaddafi Jun 9, 2011 – According to an internal DOD memo, the U.S. had already spent $664 million in Libya – a running cost of $60 million a month by mid-May …

Los Angeles Times article says $9.4 million per day.

But, not to worry. Before Obama’s War, Libya produced 1.6 million barrels/day oil. And US recently stole $33-37 billion from Libya and there will be no one to oversee what USA does with this money, just like no one oversees FED or Pentagon. In fact, these billions are real money, not paper money which props up USA at this time. USA is also especially interested in seizing Libya’s gold. « The reserves are substantial, ranking in the global top 25, according to International Monetary Fund (IMF) data.

(CNN) July 26, 2011 — International oil companies

are jockeying for advantage in the new Libya, buoyed by news that damage to the energy infrastructure appears to be slight.[So, 'the people's oil which was the people's will now be up for grabs, just like Iraq, and the people won't get it. The looting is not even masked.]

Obama's

 

We will safeguard [maybe Bernanke can help with this] the more than $33 billion that was frozen [stolen] from the Gaddafi regime so that it is available to rebuild Libya. [The money will go to Western contractors like Halliburton, just as happened in Iraq. See Shock Doctrine Disaster Capitalism, Naomi Klien onthe Womens Page .]

U.N. to allow release of $1.5 billion frozen Libya funds (Reuters)Aug 25, 2011 The United States and South Africa struck a deal on Thursday to allow the release of $1.5 billion in frozen Libya funds for humanitarian aid and other civilian needs, U.N. diplomats said on Thursday.

NATO nations set to reap spoils of Libya War

Aug 25, 2011 Rachel Shabi

It looks like the more telling news on Libya has migrated to the business pages.  With jubilant reporting of Gaddafi’s imminent downfall seizing headlines, it’s the financial pages that have the clinical analysis. So, for instance, it is in this section that the Independent reports a «  dash for profit in the post-war Libya carve up « .

Similarly, Reuters, under the headline, «  Investors eye promise, pitfalls in post-Gaddafi Libya « noted that a new government in that country could « herald a bonanza for Western companies and investors ».

Before Tripoli has completely fallen, before Gaddafi and his supporters have stepped down and before the blood dries on the bodies that have yet to be counted, Western powers are already eyeing up what they view us just rewards for the intervention.

There are no more illusions over how far NATO forces exceeded the UN security resolution that mandated its campaign. For months, NATO officials insisted it was operating within brief - an air campaign, designed to protect civilians under threat of attack. But now it is described as an « open secret » that NATO countries were operating undercover, on the ground…

… As alluded to by the Economist , each country’s contribution to the NATO effort in Libya is expected to have some impact on how much of the spoils it gets in the looming post-war period.  

After all, this money does not belong to Gaddafi [smear 21] or to us [he considered this? Absolutely, as the entire operation is a robbery] – it belongs to the Libyan people, and we will make sure they receive it. [savior 21 Gaddafi is hugely respected in Africa. He never owned the 33 billion that USA stole. So how noble that USA will destroy the country and use the peoples' money to do whatever USA wants to be done with it, and how noble of NATO countries to be slobbering over the oil and business contracts they worked so hard for, to 'save the people'.] 

Tomorrow, Secretary Clinton will go to London,

At the said meeting a reporter asks Clinton about « who are we supporting in Libya? » Clinton’s response at about 6 minutes and 20 seconds into the video, was as part of her answer, “We’re still getting to know who these people are. ” [In other words, it doesn't matter who they are, we have already bought them.]

where she will meet with the Libyan opposition [Who flew these puppets to London? In what airplane did they fly? It is a No Fly Zone. How did they get to an airport that functioned? Who vouched that they were representatives of an actual organization that represented the entire 6 million Libyans? Who elected this 'opposition'? What makes them legitimate? ] and consult with more than thirty nations. [Many of them in opposition to colonization]. These discussions will focus on what kind of political effort is necessary to pressure Gaddafi, while also supporting a transition to the future that the Libyan people deserve. [smear 22. As outlined by McKinney in introduction, Libyans already had more benefits than Americans.] Because, while our military mission is narrowly focused on saving lives [savior 22, by destroying a sovereign country's water and electricity and using Depleted Uranium Ammunition],

A telecommunication official told Libyan state television that the three stations hit by NATO strikes provided communication services for citizens to contact the fire brigades, hospitals and emergency lines and communication between eastern and western Libya.

Muammar Gaddafi has addressed nation via Libyan radio

“But certainly what has been coming from the Western media has been proven to be lies,” he declared.

Gaddafi opened up the armories to the people of Libya, more than a million rifles and other arms have been handed out to the people of Tripoli. [this must be exaggeration] The claim that has been made by the so-called ‘progressive’ media of the United States is that Gaddafi is a hated dictator and that this is an indigenous rebellion. A dictator does not hand people guns and say: ‘Please, defend me!’”

Arms Trade Resource Center – …The ongoing civil war in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (formerly Zaire) is a prime example of the devastating legacy of U.S. arms sales policy on Africa. The U.S. prolonged the rule of Zairian dictator Mobutu Sese Soko by providing more than $300 million in weapons and $100 million in military training. Mobutu used his U.S. – supplied arsenal to repress his own people and plunder his nation’s economy for three decades, [is this true or not? By now, the reader must suspect allegations and be very discerning and investigative. Who funds this research center. I think it is trustworthy because it questions Empire] until his brutal regime was overthrown by Laurent Kabila’s forces in 1997. When Kabila took power, the Clinton administration quickly offered military support by developing a plan for new training operations with the armed forces…

« The president-elect is coming into office at a moment when there is upheaval in many parts of the world simultaneously,” Kissinger responded. “You have India, Pakistan; you have the jihadist movement. [CIA funded] So he can’t really say there is one problem, that it’s the most important one. But he can give new impetus to American foreign policy partly because the reception of him is so extraordinary around the world. His task will be to developan overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a new world order can be created. It’s a great opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis.” [The strategy was already created and which is what placed both Bush Jr and Obama. It is called « Full Spectrum Dominance » as instrument of New World Order]

Wanted for Crimes Against Humanity - Henry Kissenger

obama%20and%20kissenger dans Politique/Societe

 

And as President, I refused [Savior 24] to wait for the images of slaughter[smear 27] and mass graves before taking action.

[He repeatedly takes responsibility, because he does not think he will ever be caught. He is confident, above all laws, a good war criminal. However he will be arrested. The world is waking up. The UN resolution 1973 of No Fly Zone was grossly broken using USA intelligence.There are many images now of slaughter of civilians by NATO, but Western media is suppressing it, and alternative reporters have been killed and threatened.]

Order: Kill Non-Mainstream Reporters in Libya, What U.S. is Hiding?

- Deborah Dupre - Examiner

This journalist Thierry Meyssan inTripoli was threatened.

Meyssan observations Aug 21, 2011.. NATO Carnage in Tripoli


Moreover, America has an important strategic interest
 [Which is what? He never explains.] in preventing Gaddafi from overrunning those who oppose him. A massacre [smear 28] would have driven thousands of additional refugees across Libya’s borders,

[This had already happened as seen in photo below. Note the nice luggage of refugees in photo. These are well off educated citizens of a stable nation running for their lives because of covert mercenary meddling by West, for their OIL. The reader probably has similar luggage. None of these people expected this.]

-libya-tunisia-borderTens of thousands of desperate refugees were packing the Tunisian border on Tuesday Mar 2, 2011, trying to get out of Libya.

putting enormous strains on the peaceful – yet fragile – transitions in Egypt and Tunisia. [The protests continue as the new regimes are just new puppet regimes]    The democratic [in double speak "democratic means top/down control] impulses that are dawning [hope mantra 3] across the region would be eclipsed by the darkest form [smear 29 He will use the word 'dark' again, and he, Obama, is the light? Gaddafi, the idealistic leader who gives free health care and education, helped end Apartheid and was to fund an all Africa Satellite and form an all Africa currency is considered 'dark' by Obama.]

of dictatorship, as repressive leaders concluded that violence is the best strategy to cling to power. [at least he describes the New World Order well here and what we can expect as we demand accountability in Europe and North America]

The writ of the UN Security Council would have been shown to be little more than empty words, [See references below how UN Resolution 1973 was in fact not followed as Putin, above, noted] crippling its future credibility to uphold global peace and security.

UN gives a nod and wink to USA $46 billion in arms sales for 2011.As Gaddafi correctly said in speech to UN in New York last year, « Security Council is terrorist organization in world »

Thus, Obama is carrying on myth that UN is an independent credible organization. UN is a tool for centralized global control, under the thumb of USA who denied a visa so that Libya could have no representation in UN for the entire crises.

The Role of the UN Security Council in Unleashing an Illegal War against Libya by Ronda Hauben www.globalresearch.ca

< See entire article to left.

… As of February 21, the Libyan government has been deprived of the ability to have a representative to the UN. In March, when the Libyan government tried to appoint another Ambassador, the US government did not grant a visa.”

So while I will never minimize the costs involved in military action, I am convinced that a failure to act in Libya would have carried a far greater price [for gasoline] for America. 

Now, just as there are those who have argued against intervention in Libya, there are others who have suggested that we broaden our military mission beyond the task of protecting [Savior 25] the Libyan people, and do whatever it takes to bring down Gaddafi and usher in a new government. [So then, your war is just a soft war Mr Obama? Not a hard war? Incredibly he is now painting himself as a moderate.]

Of course, there is no question [just obey] that Libya – and the world [The World excluding Germany, China, India, Russia, Africa and Brazil] – will be better off with Gaddafi out of power. [He is lying. Will Africa be better off?] I, along with many other world leaders, [NATO leaders?] have embraced that goal[of getting rid of this obstacle to Empire, who has 3% of world's oil], and will actively pursue it through non-military means. [double speak] But broadening our military mission to include regime change would be a mistake. [The entire speech is about regime change, a nice way of saying occupation. And 'mission' was broadened... 8000 sorties. All diplomatic attempts by Gaddafi were brushed away.]

Washington Post Apr 4, 2011

Libyan Foreign Minister Abdulati al-Obeidi told reporters in Tripoli on Friday, “We are trying to talk to the British, the French and the Americans to stop the killing of people. We are trying to find a mutual solution.”

…The Obama administration and its allies and partners in the Libya operation have shown little interest in such offers. President Obama has described his demand for Gaddafi’s departure as a political objective…


The task that I 
[takes full responsibility] assigned our forces – to protect[savior 25] the Libyan people from immediate danger, and to establish a No Fly Zone – carries with it a UN mandate and international support. [Repeat a lie enough times... fake coalition 20]  It is also what the Libyan opposition[contracted by CIA] asked us to do.  [It is what the USA on ground told the USA in air what to do and these foreigners are called 'the rebels'... See Libyan Tribes Manifesto below]

If we tried to overthrow Gaddafi by force, our coalition would splinter. [So we won't use force right? Is this what he infered in this speech ?] We would likely have to put U.S. troops on the ground, or risk killing many civilians from the air. [Did that on Aug 21]  The dangers faced by our men and women in uniform [heroes 2] would be far greater. So would the costs, and our share of the responsibility for what comes next. 

To be blunt, we went down that road in Iraq . [He is lying as he used past tense. USA is still going down that road now and is committed to that road indefinitely as was planned decades ago and as shown by 14 permanent bases immediately constructed after USa murderous assault on Iraqis. USA has no intention on leaving Iraq until the oil gone. Libya is same exact story]

Thanks to the extraordinary sacrifices of our troops [heroes 3] and the determination of our diplomats, we are hopeful about Iraq’s future. [With our 14 permanent military bases, the private oil companies and Haliburton andKBR are hopeful.]

 

But regime change there took eight years, [If it already happened, why are we still there?]  thousands of American and [millions] Iraqi lives, and nearly a trillion dollars. That is not something we can afford to repeat in Libya. 

[So whats the endgame in Libya look like? Complete suppression? Because the Libyan people will resist occupation forever, right? Just like Iraq and Afghanistan and Viet Nam. There is no way to win when making someone a victim is the game. Colonization won't work in a communicating world. The blowback in Europe from angry Moslems will not be pretty. However, those at the top want violence as excuse for martial law. Our work is to wake up and remove them from power.] 

As the bulk of our military effort ratchets down, [Has it?] what we can do – and will do – is support the aspirations [hope mantra 4] of the Libyan people. [Savior 27] We have intervened to stop a massacre, [third of forth time with this lie? Smear 30] and we will work with our allies and partners[fake coalition 21] as they’re in the lead to maintain the safety of civilians.[Savior 28]

We will deny the regime arms, cut off its supply of cash [water, electricity, food, communications], assist the opposition [with more "contracts"], and work with other nations [fake coalition 22] to hasten the day when Gaddafi leaves power.

It may not happen overnight, as a badly weakened Gaddafi tries desperately [smear 31] to hang on to power. [smear 32] But it should be clear [obey] to those around Gaddafi, and to every Libyan, that history is not on his side. [As you hear the bombs you know history is not on the side of the sovereign days when you Libyans had your own nation. Now history is on the side of the bombs.]

With the time [rebuilding everything] and space [without loved ones, killed by NATO] that we have provided [Savior 29] for the Libyan people, they[mercenaries] will be able to determine their own destiny, and that is how it should be. [This is horrific double speak. When will Americans have same ability? When will American elections not be rigged? See American Blackout. When will money no longer buy representation?] 

Let me close by addressing what this action says about the use of America’s military power, and America’s broader
 [Self appointed and self serving] leadership in the world [A definition of world that excludes Germany, India, China, Africa, Brazil or Russia], under my presidency. [Savior 30 ] 

As Commander-in-Chief, I have no greater responsibility than keeping this country safe. [Savior 31 The only super power is worried about this? Well, there were those guys in the caves who took down World Trade Center Building 7 at 5:30 pm on 9/11 that the reader may have never heard of becasue it not discussed by controlled media or in coverup 9/11 official report. Remember those guys in the cave that started the ‘War on Terror’ ? Please see the Womens Pagefor more info on 9/11]

10 second video. The Controlled Demolition of World Trade Center Building 7 at 5:30 PM on Sept 11, 2001 which never was hit by a plane, with small fires allowed to burn all day. Watch how it falls. Did a man on kidney dialysis living in a cave tell the fire fighters to stand back? Who did this? And more importantly, who covered this up?

And no decision weighs on me more than when to deploy our men and women in uniform. [Heroes 4.  Pledge allegiance to the uniform.  He is actually using mind control.]   I have made it clear that I will never hesitate [strong leader ] to use our military swiftly, decisively, and unilaterally when necessary to defend our people, our homeland, our allies [NATO], and our core interests. [Other people's resources]

That is why we are going after al Queda wherever they seek a foothold.[And we will invent a foothold where we want to defend our 'core interests', as we have done repeatedly all over the world. It is called Empire.] That is why we continue to fight in Afghanistan, [« Al queda » left years ago.  Why is USA really there?   Why did Unocal want and get a pipeline there? and who will defend it? Why did USA start up opium after Taliban ended it?]

even as we have ended our combat mission in Iraq [Ended combat in Iraq? Every day, right now, we are killing civilians in Iraq so we can steal their oil.  This statement of ‘ending’ it will give war resisters and anti-war veterans proof of fraud.See Veterans Page] and removed more than 100,000 troops from that country. [And left 50,000 troops indefinitely?]

 

 

There will be times, though, when our safety is not directly threatened, but our interests [controlling other nations] and values [seeing ourselves as superior] are. [The USA has never been threatened but we have started more wars than all the other countries combined. However, Americans are waking up. The 2010 military budget equaled 94% of federal income tax? And Mr. Obama wants to gut services and chop social security to balance budget?]

Sometimes, the course of history poses challenges that threaten our common humanity and common security [This is prep talk for planned false flag global emergency as excuse for global martial law… this is what  was planned with WHO pandemic swine flu, but it failed.  We can be sure other global emergencies are in works..]

– responding to natural disasters [except Somalia or any place we want to see weakened.  Have we ever aided Cuba with one hurricane for 50 years?], for example; or preventing genocide [Pot Pot Cambodia (USA) and Rwanda Genocide (NATO) would not have happened without being backed] and keeping the peace [control]; ensuring regional security [status quo empire], and maintaining the flow of commerce [so empire can extract as much as possible and enslave other nations with IMF debt].

These may not be America’s problems alone, but they are important to us, and they are problems worth solving. [For Obama the problem is.... "keeping, ensuring, maintaining" . Not inequity or disparity or lying or corruption. For Obama and Kissinger, the problem is how to maintain king of the mountain status, not how to bring sovereignty to all people. Obama is a colonialist.]

And in these circumstances, we know that the United States, as the world’s most powerful nation [the most in debt with the biggest war budget and most brainwashed people], will often be called upon to help. [Savior 31. But it is not within our superior values to help.  US only sacrifices if it helps our 'core interests". Did we help the people of Laos? ] 

In such cases, we should not be afraid [Don't be a coward, be a man, follow your President] to act – but the burden of action [Lets congratulate ourselves for all of our sacrifice] should not be America’s alone.

As we have in Libya, our task is instead to mobilize the international [fake coalition 24] community for collective action. [But don't have Congress vote for collective action] Because contrary to the claims of some [who?], American leadership is not simply a matter of going it alone and bearing all of the burden ourselves. [Repeating word Burden 3 times to make Americans feel we have carried so much weight for others. A lie.]

Real leadership [Like Obama?] creates the conditions and coalitions for others [others to work with NATO?] to step up as well; to work with allies and partners [fake coalition 25] so that they bear their share of the burden [4th time] and pay their share of the costs [Libya will have to pay to rebuild itself, just like Iraq. This is who will work with NATO]; and to see that the principles of justice and human dignity are upheld by all. [pure double speak] 

That’s the kind of leadership [savior 32] we

[Who is we? It is not Congress because they were bypassed. It is not NATO that USA controls. It is not Obama who is just a robot fulfilling plans laid decades before? Who is we? Who controls Council of Foreign Relations that Hillary bows to? Who times the orcheastrated events we witness?]

have shown in Libya. Of course, even when we act as part of a coalition[fake coalition 26], the risks [for civilians] of any military action will be high. Those risks were realized when one of our planes malfunctioned over Libya.

Yet when one of our airmen parachuted to the ground, in a country whose leader has so often demonized the United States [smear 34] – in a region that has such a difficult history with our country [Is he refering to Western meddling? Our attacks and crippling embargoes against any country that stands against Empire, like Libya or Cuba? ] – this American did not find enemies.

Instead, he was met by people who embraced him. One young Libyan who came to his aid said, “We are your friends. We are so grateful to these men who are protecting the skies.” [No one would ever say that! Protecting the skies and forcing a food embargo on a country? This is all a lie.] 

 The CIA managed mercenaries picked up the pilot and he was taken to a hotel.

This voice is just one of many [fabricated lies] in a region where a new generation is refusing to be denied their rights and opportunities any longer. [That would be the fully educated generation in Libya with highest income in Africa? This is nothing like the protestors of Egypt who are hungry because world food prices have been run up by commodity traders and manipulated oil price.]

Rising Food Prices and the Egyptian Tinderbox: How Banks and Investors Are Starving the Third World Ellen Brown Feb 4, 2011

Let Them Eat Baklava: Food Prices and the Arab Spring Spencer Mandel Aug 26, 2011

Yes, this change will make the world more complicated for a time. Progress will be uneven, and change will come differently in different countries.

[It sounds like he is talking about the demand by youth for end of corruption and engineered disparity, but he will in next sentences redefine "change" as coming under the heel of empire as Iran had under the Shah and Iraq now has under military occupation. In this way he has co-opted the very essence of 'hope' which he had sold so well in his election campaign.]

There are places, like Egypt, where this change will inspire us and raise our hopes. [hope mantra 5] [Egypt protests were steered. New ‘leader’ of Egypt is CIA plant who is already receiving protests]

And there will be places, like Iran, where change [Meaning youthful hopes?] is fiercely suppressed.

Obama just set his sights on Iran…. AGAIN.

« Coup 1953 of Iran is the CIA’s (Central Intelligence Agency) first successful overthrow of a foreign government. 

But a copy of the agency’s secret history of the coup [in Iran] has surfaced, revealing the inner workings of a plot that set the stage for the Islamic revolution in 1979, and for a generation of anti-American hatred in one of the Middle East’s most powerful countries. The document, which remains classified, discloses the pivotal role British intelligence officials played in initiating and planning the coup, and it shows that Washington and London shared an interest in maintaining the West’s control over Iranian oil. …. The operation, code-named TP-AJAX, was the blueprint for a succession of CIA plots to foment coups and destabilize governments during the cold war – including the agency’s successful coup in Guatemala in 1954 and the disastrous Cuban intervention known as the Bay of Pigs in 1961. In more than one instance, such operations led to the same kind of long-term animosity toward the United States that occurred in Iran…. «  continue

Iranians threw Shah out in Iran’s People Power ‘Arab Spring’ 30 years ago.  They already had their overthrow of tyranny (US planted Shah who replaced democracy) and now Iran has large opposition demonstrations exactly like USA did in Wisconsin recently, and Seattle in WTO protests 1999. Protests are a sign of freedom and Iran has it. whereas now, in USA protests are NOT REPORTED because Lying Government / controlled media is terrified of snowball effect.

At least 1,400 arrests for antiwar dissent, but who’s counting? Not the press. July 22, 2011

« The national news media almost totally ignore homefront protests of the Afghanistan war, killer drones, torture, and more, regardless of their newsworthiness…. » continued.

We know Ahmadinejad has been demonized by West, and our government/media even changed the translation of a statement he made, to claim he wanted death of Israel, which he never said.

« Ahmadinejad’s October 2005 speech was mis-translated  from Persian into English by the Middle East Media Research Institute (Memri), owned by two Zionist Israeli Jews, Meyrav Wurmser and Col. Yigal Carmon. The translation quoting Ahmadinejad calling for Israel being “wiped off the map” – has become as much part of the Jewish religion as…. continued (you may find the site disabled on interent explorer browser « by coincidence » and difficult to view).

« When properly translated the Iranian president actually calls for the removal of the regimes that are in power in Israel and in the USA as a goal for the future. Nowhere does he demand the elimination or annihilation of Israel. He called for greater governance for Palestine. The word map does not even feature. And the president makes plain that the Holocaust happened, but, he argues western powers have exploited the memory of the Holocaust for their own imperialistic purposes. What the mainstream ran with is complete deception. »

USA also lies about Iran nuclear intentions, while Iran allows IEAE inspections and is above board on its projects….

« The continuous efforts of the world’s two militarist-aggressor states–the United States and Israel–to demonize Iran was addressed by Ahmadinejad in his speech to the UN General Assembly (September 23). Ahmadinejad spoke of the assault on human dignity and spiritual values by the selfish material interests of the US and its puppet states. Seeking hegemony « under the mantle of freedom, » the US and its puppets use « the ugliest methods of intimidation and deceit » to disguise that they are « the first who violate » the fundamental principles that they espouse and apply to others. «  - Paul Craig Roberts

USA wants Iran oil. The question is whether Iranians would want an occupation like Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya? What is the reader’s guess? Since none of these occupied countries were given a choice in taking « freedom » and are now killing USA troops as fast as possible, what is Obama’s plans for Iran? Another occupation, as we can expect now in Libya « to maintain peace »?

This is the pattern and so, in the same speech he justifies the rape and looting of Libya he drops in the name Iran to prep everyone for the planned war « to save the yearning youth » of Iran.

The dark forces of civil conflict and sectarian war will have to be averted, and difficult political and economic concerns addressed.

[What sectarian war? In Iran? Where? In Iraq 'sectarian' war is the excuse for continued USA presence. In fact, there is no sectarian war, there is a united front against USA occupation. How to keep the 'sectarian war ' myth alive? The way endless "sectarian conflict" is insured is by using false flag terrorism. If this is a new subject for reader, the reality is shocking. We can expect this to happen in Libya also. The USA will continue killing and claim it is sectarian inter-tribal conflict and this will justify a 'peace keeping force' (this was written Aug 25th). Will NATO use mercenaries, or risk NATO troops getting killed? Let us review the current policy of fomenting sectarian divisions in Iraq and Pakistan]

Kay Griggs, former wife of U.S. Marine Corps Colonel George Griggs, Chief of Staff, Marine Atlantic/Head of Psychological Operations, NATO, describes elements of de-stabilization programs….

 

 

 

« The evidence that the US directly contributed to the creation of the current civil war in Iraq by its own secretive security strategy is compelling. Historically of course this is nothing new – divide and rule is a strategy for colonial powers… »The Politics of Suicide in the Muslim World by Nashid Abdul-Khaaliq

Iraqi Terrorists Exposed as British Government Agent  Provocateurs

« Lest we forget who the real Terrorists are… You might recall this incident in Iraq, back in September 2005. It’s a rare instance where the perps of a false flag op were caught red-handed. Every time one hears of “terrorist” bombings in Iraq or Afghanistan, chances are it’s US, Brit, or Mossad agents creating mayhem in order to justify the illegal occupations of these countries. Yet, the sheeple hardly give this a second thought — even after this incident was blown wide open in the MSM … continue here.

british-terrorists

Long history of manipulation with false flag terror

Fake Al Qaeda | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED

« CIA/US Military Perpetrated Most of Iraq’s « Suicide Bombings! » by Andrew G. Marshal
Terrorism Guaranteed by manager Donald Rumseld - Counterpunch

Suicide bombing favorite US counter insurgency tactic

Press TV – NATO plans to arm Syria criminal gangs Aug 14, 2011

There are many many more articles on this. There are entire Departments and schools in Military devoted to false flag murder.

 

Video Below – Minister Farrakan to Obama on USA De-stabilization Policy [Powerful message - Starts out soft but principle makes him roar.]

 

 

 

[we return to speech] 
The United States will not be able to dictate the pace and scope of this change. 
[Interesting sentence.... is  being able to dictate a consideration? Sounds like it.] Only the people of the region can do that. But we can make a difference. [We can send in mercenaries. That is what we did in Iraq, Afghanistan, and now Libya, and in fact all over the world.]

I believe that this movement of change [in this new double speak "movement of change" refers to New World Order ] cannot be turned back, and that we must stand alongside

[Exactly here he achievs the co-option. At first the 'movement of change' was youthful voices. But in this sentence 'movement of change is equated with....]

those who believe in the same core principles [$ and domination] that have guided us through many storms [what storms? Desert Storms?] our opposition to violence directed against one’s own citizens

[Where? In recent London riots? In Seattle 1999 WTO demonstration? How about deployment of Blackwater mercenaries for Katrina? USA has six times more people in prison than the world’s average number. Land of the jailed.]; our support for a set of universal rights, including the freedom for people to express themselves and choose their leaders [Our own elections are rigged with voting machines and disenfranchisement of Black votes];our support for governments that are ultimately responsive to the aspirations [hope mantra 5] of the people.

[It is opposite. the last thing Empire wants is a sovereign individual or community]

As we have studied, there is NO example of USA helping anyone without making a profit or gaining influence. USA core values, as shown by the financial plans of corporations in crushed Iraq, and now Libya, is a very far cry from ‘youthful voices’, but he spanned the gap with double speak.

It is vital for the reader to understand mind programming. The method is that if you listen enough times that ‘slavery is freedom’, you will believe it. Is the reader free? You work for 2 to 3 months per year to pay your federal income tax, and 94% of your tax will be to feed the military budjet based on fake « War on Terror », but you are free, right? You live in a ‘free’ country right? You live in a democracy right? You’ve been told this thousands of times. You have crossed your heart and said it. You have been told that slavery is freedom, and I’m sure the reader is thinking, « I am no slave ». But you are being used. Let me please ask you again. Do you live in a free country?

How will your mind answer? Do you think you live in a free country where we are informed so we can make sound decisions? Or are we slaves of disinformation, sweating to pay for things we have no control over?

It is important to reprogram ourselves. We are slaves. We are slaves. We are slaves. Perhaps we should repeat that 10,000 times just to get things even, because until you realize that you have been used as the Veterans have, you will continue to be used. – Ray Songtree


Born, as we are, out of a revolution by those who longed 
[hope mantra 6] to be free [and created a Constitution which Obama is destroying. See index... No the revolution wasn't based on longing. It was based on principle. Obama sold us hope. He did this because he had no principles to offer. Ron Paul and Dennis Kuninich and McKinney and Farrakan don't sell hope. They stand by principle. ] , we welcome the fact that history is on the move in the Middle East and North Africa, and that young people are leading the way.

[Young people are protesting, and CIA is moving in to co-opt. Remember what Kissinger said... crisis is an opportunity for a new world order. Does Obama support guerrilla fighters against outside empire the way Americans fought English Empire? If so, then he will like the Manifesto of 200 Libyan Tribes below]

Because wherever people long to be free, they will find a friend in the United States. [Double speak. Where ever people want change, USA will promote instability to insert its own agents.]

Ultimately, it is that faith [hope mantra 7] – those ideals – that are the true measure of American leadership. [So he equates himself, the leader against 'dark' Gaddafi as 'that faith'. Sound like another Savior 33]

[The arrogant attitude of superiority is that "America" is destined to lead everyone else and this justifies our huge military, where we 'lead' by covert and outright threats.  Why are there US military bases on Venezuela borders now? Chavez is as good a leader as any in South America, but Venezuela has OIL!]

My fellow Americans, I know that at a time of upheaval overseas – when the news is filled with conflict [which we fund] and change [Actual change is constant and intrinsic... but he defined change already. Change is domination by NWO, the opportunity for more centralization.] – it can be tempting to turn away from the world. And as I have said before, our strength abroad is anchored in our strength at home. [20% unemployment. So slaves, not only are you free, but you are strong at home.] 

That must always be our North Star [Like the HAARP display over Oslo for Peace prize?] – the ability of our people to reach their potential [pay student loans, pay mortgages?], to make wise choices with our resources [Strip mine everything and drill no matter the risk], to enlarge the prosperity [the debt ceiling] that serves as a wellspring of our power [guns], and to live the values that we hold so dear. [ Posse Comitatus, Habeas Corpus, the Bill of Rights… or… TSA, SWAT teams, wire tapping, dumbed down… what values are we living? Constitution or Patriot Act? Which?] 

But let us also remember that for generations, we have done the hard work of protecting our own people [?], as well as millions around the globe. [We killed millions in southeast Asia for what? World War I and II and the Bolshevics and Mao were all funded by Western bankers. What is he talking about?1.5 million in Iraq killed, for what?]

Over one million Iraqis have met violent deaths as a result of the 2003 invasion, according to a study conducted by the prestigious British polling group, Opinion Research Business (ORB). These numbers suggest that the invasion and occupation of Iraq rivals the mass killings of the last century—the human toll exceeds the 800,000 to 900,000 believed killed in the Rwandan genocide in 1994, and is approaching the number (1.7 million) who died in Cambodia’s infamous “Killing Fields” during the Khmer Rouge era of the 1970s. Project Censored

We have done so because we know that our own future is safer and brighter if more of mankind can live with the bright light [hope mantra 7] of freedom and dignity. [Double Speak. Up equals down. He means New World Order which is no freedom and no dignity. Did he hypnotize you yet? He said it all many many many many times.]

Tonight, let us give thanks for the Americans who are serving through these trying times [the fooled an misused heroes], and the coalition [NATO fake coalition 27] that is carrying our [possessive pronoun] effort forward; and let us look to the future with confidence and hope [hope mantra 8] not only for our own country, but for all those yearning [hope mantra 9] for freedom[double speak] around the world. [where he wants to bring his brand of freedom... global] Thank you, God Bless you, and may God Bless the United States of America. [If you disagree with him you are going against God. Nice touch, used by every con man in every land in every era. Perhaps listening for Truth is more important than giving up our principles because someone invokes the name of God.]   

Summary

Lets see if Obama did well by Hitler…

Adolf Hitler said: ‘Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.’

goebbels_1

And his propaganda chief, Joseph Goebbels, said: ‘The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly – it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over.« 

Smeared Gaddafi 34 times, claimed USA and himself as Savior 32 times, mentioned a bogus ‘international community » that excludes Germany, Asia, Africa, South America and Russia, that is really just USA controled and funded NATO, 27 times, and the Hope Mantra so that justice is always put off to the future and not based on principle 9 times.

Please consider this incredible amount of mind programming. And the entire purpose was to make night become day, and day become night. Gaddafi has been altruistic and is slandered to be a demon. USA is the most war mongering and murderous country in history and is portrayed as Savior.

Was that purpose of speech? It surely was not to inform, as it was all lies. So this is the Hitler technique, repeat the lie over and over and over again, so that every sentence includes a lie. In just over 100 sentences we see lies 34 times, 32 times, 27 times, and 9 times.

Did the hero save the damsel in distress from the Bad guy as the speech promises?

In Reality USA siezed Libya by the throat on completely fabricated charges. There was never violent suppression of demonstrations because there were no demonstrations.

In this short BBC video, we are shown a crowd of happy people celebrating overthrow of Gaddafi, but the trouble is, the clip is from India. Short clip worth watching more than once.The entire presentation on news of what has happened in Libya is one long lie. Here is article showing analysis of another fake celebration in Tripoli.

  

 

The Obama Libya War Speech is comforting ‘big daddy mind control’ for those who have been conditioned to ‘respect the President’. The cure for this disease is studying the truth, being shocked by the matrix of lies, rejecting belief in authority, and cultivating personal sovereignty. « I will never be a sheeple again! » « Not on my watch!. » « Not with my taxes! » « Not in my community! » Replace « hope » with principle and we can save this world.

- Ray Songtree Aug 27, 2011 

Would you like to create a new Curriculum of Honest History and Science for our schools. Become a member.

 

 

some LINKS to more Study

some links on Lockerbie 1988 Pan Am crash blamed on Libya

1. bionicboy.tripod.com/tragedy. html -  The one given most credence is that Libya was behind the bombing – two …. 25/5/2000: An air accidentinvestigator has told the Lockerbie trial there was a … Protheroe testified in the specially built Scottish court in the Netherlands that he 

2. Wikipedia , the official NWO disinformation rag, outlines the compensation Libya gave to victims in order to remove sanctions   » On 24 February 2004, Libyan Prime Minister Shukri Ghanem stated in a BBCRadio 4 interview that his country had paid the compensation as the « price for peace » and to secure the lifting of sanctions. Asked if Libya did not accept guilt, he said, « I agree with that. » 
In other words, Libya always denied any involvement with Pan Am 103 crash.


3. Meanwhile, because of suppressed evidence, just like 911, there is a current Pan Am 103 jet crash truth movement in UK.   
« On 2 September 2009, former MEP Michael McGowan demanded that the British Government call for an urgent, independent inquiry led by the UN to find out the truth about Pan Am flight 103. « We owe it to the families of the victims of Lockerbie and the international community to identify those responsible, » In other words, many in UK know the Libya terrorist story was a lie.

Also http://lockerbiecase.blogspot.com/2009/11/former-diplomat-urges-macaskill-to.html

4. Wiki-encyclopedia rag does not cover CIA who placed bomb. 
see here http://www.welfarestate.com/ panam103/

there are many more references which I have not listed

more links (to be edited… site under construction)

  1. Libya : Oil, Banks, the United Nations and America’s Holy Crusade

    www. globalresearch .ca/index. php?context=va&aid=24151 - Libya : Oil, Banks, the United Nations and America’s Holy Crusade. by Felicity Arbuthnot. Global Research , April 5, 2011. Email this article to a friend. Print this .. ?

  2. Putin Likens UN Security Council Resolution on Libya to a Medieval …

    www. globalresearch .ca/index. php?context=va&aid=23833 – Putin Likens UN Security Council Resolution on Libya to a Medieval Crusade. Global Research , March 21, 2011. Russian Information Agency Novosti … 

  3. UN Security Council Resolution on Libya : No Fly Zone and Other …

    www. globalresearch .ca/index. php?context=va&aid=23780 - UNSecurity Council Resolution on Libya : No Fly Zone and Other Measures. Global Research , March 18, 2011. Email this article to a friend. Print this article … 

  4. Libya , Hypocrisy and Betrayal by the United Nations : Death and …

    www. globalresearch .ca/index. php?context=va&aid=23767 – Mar 18, 2011 – Global Economic Crisis … Global Research RSS Feed … Libya, Hypocrisy and Betrayal by the United Nations : Death and Destruction. … 

  5. France arming Libyan rebels in violation of UNresolution

    www. globalresearch .ca/index. php?context=va&aid=25494 – Jul 3, 2011 – France has become the first country openly to admit it has supplied the Libyan rebels with weapons – a measure banned by theUN Security … 

  6. UN Praised Libya’s Human … – Centre for Research on Globalization

    www. globalresearch .ca/index. php?context=va&aid=24154 - UNPraised Libya’s Human Rights Record. Washington Attempted to Block Release of UNHRC Report. Global Research , April 5, 2011. Email this article to a … 

  7. Obama’s Bay of Pigs in Libya : Imperialist Aggression Shreds UN 

    www. globalresearch .ca/index. php?context=va&aid=23847 – Obama’s Bay of Pigs in Libya : Imperialist Aggression Shreds UNCharter. by Dr. Webster G. Tarpley. Global Research , March 22, 2011.http://tarpley.net/  

  8. UN Security Council Role in Unleashing an … – TheGlobal Realm

    the global realm.com/…/ un – security-council-role-in- unleashing-an-ill… – Jul 28, 2011 – UN Security Council Role in Unleashing an Illegal War against Libya . by Ronda Hauben Global Research July 20, 2011. Journalists Question … 

  9. UK Indymedia – Obama to Qaddafi: Comply with UNresolution or …

    www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2011/ 03/476220.html .Libya , hypocrisy and betrayal by the United Nations : Death and destruction. US-NATO’s new war in North Africa by Felicity Arbuthnot, Global Research ,

  1. Libya : “The Price of Freedom” | NWO Observer

    nwoobserver.wordpress.com/ 2011/04/…/ libya -the-price- of-freedom… -Apr 28, 2011 – Published: Apr. 27, 2011 – Global Research. Libya has the highest living standard in Africa. The “ United NationsDevelopment Program … 

  2. Another war for oil: UN approves Libyan no fly zone and military action

    www.minorityperspective.co.uk/ …/another-war-for-oil- Mar 18, 2011 – Professor Michel Chossudovsky ( Global Research : “OperationLibya ” and the Battle for Oil: Redrawing the Map of Africa: March 9, 2011) states … 

  3. Libya Intervention: Obama Wrongly Adopts U.N.“Responsibility to …

    www.heritage.org/ research /…/ libya -intervention-obama- wrongly-ad… – Mar 31, 2011 – The President’s Justification for the LibyanIntervention …. 2130, May 1, 2008, at http://www.heritage.org/Research /Reports/2008/05/ … for Global Solutions, athttp://globalsolutions.org/ 08orbust/pcq/clinton (March 31, 2011). … 

  4. Secret War Games Suggest US, UK … – Environmentalists Against War

    www.envirosagainstwar.org/know/read.php?itemid=10805 - Apr 23, 2011 – Under an Imaginary UN Security Council Resolution 3003. Prof. Michel Chossudovsky / Global Research THE WAR ON LIBYAWAS KNOWN … 

  5. BEFORE RESOLUTION 1973, THE U.N. PRAISED LIBYAFOR ITS HUMAN …

    libya 360.wordpress.com/…/ before-resolution-1973-the-u- n-praised-... Apr 4, 2011 – Global Research . 1. The Working Group on the Universal Periodic … 1 thought on “BEFORE RESOLUTION 1973, THE U.N. PRAISED LIBYA FOR ITS … 

  6. Russia, NATO differ on Libya resolution – Lavrov | World | RIA Novosti

    en.rian.ru/world/20110704/ 165014778.html Jul 4, 2011 – Russia and NATO have different views of UN Security Council …. Al Qaeda to Kill Qaddafi, Global Research , March 25, 2011, emphasis added) … 

  7. Libyan PM urges UN intervention to stop NATO military attack …

    williambowles.info/…/ libyan – pm-urges- un -intervention-to- stop-nato… Jul 11, 2011 – NATO Prepares ‘Humanitarian’ Occupation OfLibya Thousands of NATO troops … Global Research : NATO’s Bloody War of Aggression in Libya  

  8. Libya Oil Grab Disguised As Humanitarian Assistance: ‘No-Fly Zone …

    www.twf.org/News/Y2011/0308- Oil.html Mar 8, 2011 – While others clamor for a no-fly zone over Libya , the Libyan rebels’ themselves … Gulf Cooperation Council demands that the UN Security Council take all …. Attempted Coup d’Etat in Libya ?, » globalresearch .ca, March 7, 2011 … 

  9. SUSAN LINDAUER: LIBYA’S BLOOD FOR OIL: THE VAMPIRE WAR …

    news-now.org/2011/…/susan- lindauer- libya ‘s-blood-oil- vampire-wa… Apr 2, 2011 – And of course the United Nations forced Gadhaffi to hand over two Libyan …. Chossudovsky at the Global ResearchCentre are must reading: … 

  10. Bay of Pigs in Libya : Imperialist Aggression Shreds UNCharter …

    www.projectworldawareness.com/ …/bay-of-pigs-in- libya – imperialist… -Mar 24, 2011 – Global Research , March 22, 2011 On March 19, US and British cruise … Libya had responded to the UNvote by declaring a cease-fire, but

Media disinformation in West

 

 

Who is Gaddafi?

A Story about Libya, the Great Man Made River, Psy-Op, and the use of Media. Audio only 25 minutes

 

 

 

We must cry to think that our tax dollars are paying to destroy other countries so we can steal their resources and enjoy the comfort of ignoring what we have done. 

In destroying Libya’s water infrastructure and even their water pipe factory, we can see the plan in Libya was to create a completely traumatized impoverished populace, dependent on NATO.  More than that, in destroying archaeological sites, NATO= USA wants the cultural identity of the native people to be erased. Sovereignty must be destroyed in an oil colony. 

But since we in the West will never hear what is really happening in Libya, we taxpayers now have 
« plausible deniability » .  With orchestrated controlled disinformation by  mainstream media, our tax money can now go to crimes against humanity.  We must do more than weep now.  We must turn this around by educating our neighbors. » – Ray Songtree     

Looming Tragedy: Vision of the “New Libya” 
http://www.globalresearch.ca/ index.php?context=va&aid=26353   Sept 3 2011 

excerpts below 

« Queues of cars now wait for petrol in another oil rich country; other queues form, carrying containers for water. The multibillion dollar  development of Libya’s vast underground aquifers had been dubbed the “eighth wonder of the world. Libya`s water supply infrastructure has been been systematically bombed throughout the country. 

Shops are without food. 

The all is: “absolute disaster”, according to an eminent legal observer, very familiar with the country. 

And with electricity largely off, those seeking knowledge as to whether friends and relatives are alive, injured, fled, dead, find internet, and phones dead.

As the terribly injured overwhelm hospitals, many are bombed, damaged or without power and pharmaceuticals. 

No power: no incubators, life support machines or surgery. 

Another country with a modern, developed infrastructure reduced to a pre-industrial age – with the rebuilding contracts reportedly already being divvied out – in the West….

A number of lunches later, on the 23rd August, NATO spokeswoman, Oana Lungesco, re-affirmed their “mandate to protect civilians.” 

How this squares with hitting: “over five thousand [official figures] legitimate targets [in a] 24/7 operation [with] over twenty thousand sorties”, is confusing. 

The actual number of strikes has not been reported. Its in the tens of thousands. 

Equally so is how destruction of services essential to maintaining life, State institutions, schools, hospitals, archeological sites and treasures, attacking of all which is illegal under swathes of international law, are included in this “legitimacy.”

By September 1st, NATO operations from 31st March had reached: “a total of 21,090, including 7,920 strike sorties.”….. 

“The international community will be watching and supporting” Libya, said Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, adding requirements to the new Libyan constitution. There is a “clear road map to democracy.” Afghan and Iraqi puppets, now joined by Libyan ones.

When it comes to the rebuilding of Libya, “investors can’t call the tune”, was one theme, it must be “Libyan led.” 

UK Foreign Secretary William Hague blew that lie. Britain, he said: “would not be left behind.” Much focus was on rebuilding the oil industry. Heaven forbid that too, follows the Iraq model, with the bereaved, dispossessed and invaded blowing up the pipelines – and contractors…..

“30 April 2011: The bombing of the Downs Syndrome School in Tripoli

30 April 2011: The bombing of a Gaddafi residence, murdering Saif Gaddafi, his friend and 3 Gaddafi children.

13 May 2011: The murder of 11 Muslim Imams in Brega. 

12 June 2011: The bombing of the University of Tripoli. Death toll not yet established.

22 July 2011: The bombing of the Great Man made Waterway irrigation system, which supplies most Libyans with their drinking water.

23 July 2011: The bombing of the factory which makes the pipes for the water system, and the murder of 6 of its employees.

8th August 2011: The bombing of the Hospital at Zliten. Resulting in the murder of a minimum, of 50 human beings, many of them children. The bombing of hospitals is against all international laws, and a most grievous crime.

9 August 2011: The bombing of the village of Majer, resulting in the murder of 85 civilians. 33 Children, 32 women and 20 men.

The persistent ongoing bombing of the civilian population in Zliten and Tripoli, death toll not yet established.

David Cameron has admitted that UK special services have assisted the terrorists on the ground, in defiance of the UN mandate.”

Today, Cameron has gone further, admitting that British forces played a: “key role.”

3 mai 2011

Oussama Ben Laden est Mort, oui mais il y a dix ans

Classé dans : Politique/Societe — uriniglirimirnaglu @ 18 : 02

Ben Laden est mort en décembre 2001, selon de nombreuses sources + vidéos

http://www.internationalnews.fr/article-les-veterans-us-ben-laden-est-mort-en-decembre-2001-59811062.html

A l’heure où, une nouvelle fois, ressurgit le spectre du grand méchant loup (« Ben Laden menace la France pour sa politique afghane« , « Ben Laden menace la France« ), nous republions  un article paru voici  le 27 octobre 2010, enrichi de plusieurs vidéos:

- L’une de Benazir Bhutto annonçant, un mois avant son propre assassinat, que Ben Laden avait été assassiné en 2001 par les services pakistanais

- L’autre, extraite d’un débat avec le géopolitologue Gérard Challiand qui affirme la même chose.

Voir aussi: 

Noam Chomsky : Aucune preuve de l’implication de Ben Laden dans les attentats du 9/11


Gordon Duff: les États-Unis reconnaissent ouvertement que Ben Laden est mort depuis longtemps.

Oussama Ben Laden est Mort, oui mais il y a dix ans  dans Politique/Societe fakeladen


 Gordon Duff, un ancien Marine US parle de sa honte et du déshonneur qu’ont représenté pour lui, et représentent encore aujourd’hui, les continuelles évocations par Bush et maintenant par Obama, de l’ennemi public numéro un, Oussama Ben Laden. Il revient sur le gâchis innommable de cette guerre faite au nom d’un simulacre de chasse à l’homme, puisque les administrations américaines successives, les Services Secrets et tant d’autres personnes même bien moins informées savent depuis longtemps que ben Laden est mort en décembre 2001 après avoir toujours nié être l’organisateur des attentats du 11-Septembre.


 dans Politique/Societe
Gordon Duff

Des années de mensonge : les États-Unis reconnaissent ouvertement que Ben Laden est mort depuis longtemps.


par Gordon Duff, Veterans Today, le 5 décembre 2009

Ben Laden absent du rapport de McChrystal et du discours d’Obama: « La traque de ben Laden », une honte nationale.


Il y a des années que le commentateur conservateur, l’ancien Colonel de Marine Bob Pappas, explique que Ben Laden est mort à Tora Bora et que l’affirmation du Sénateur Kerry selon laquelle Ben Laden a pu fuir avec l’aide de Bush est un mensonge. Nous savons maintenant que Pappas voyait juste. Entendre la Secrétaire d’État Clinton lors de son passage au Pakistan parler de Ben Laden était terriblement embarrassant. Ben Laden est mort le 13 décembre 2001 et maintenant enfin, Obama, McChrystal, Cheney, et tous ceux qui ne sont pas complètement stupides finissent par avouer ce qu’ils savaient depuis des années.

Cependant, puisque nous avons perdu entre 200 et 300 hommes au sein de nos meilleures troupes d’opérations spéciales alors que nous savions Ben Laden mort, quelqu’un va-t-il pour autant passer derrière les barreaux ? Et vu que nous avons dépensé 200 millions de dollars pour ces « Special Ops » à la recherche d’un homme dont on savait qu’il était mort, qui donc ira en prison pour cela ? Bush, Rumsfeld et Cheney, pour des raisons que l’on sait maintenant d’ordre POLITIQUE, parlaient continuellement d’un homme qu’ils savaient décédé, mais qui ira en prison pour cela ? Pourquoi en 2004, des vidéos qui s’avérèrent contrefaites ont-elles été brandies comme des preuves issues du Renseignement pour faire basculer des élections [américaines] à l’issue incertaine ?  C’est un acte criminel, s’il en fut.

En 66 pages, le Général Stanley McChrystal ne mentionne pas une seule fois Oussama Ben Laden. Il n’y en a que pour « le Mollah Omar » à présent. Lors de son intervention à West Point, le Président Obama n’a jamais mentionné Oussama Ben Laden non plus. Pour le Colonel Pappas, c’est très clair : le vice-président Cheney « a laissé tomber » Ben Laden il y a longtemps. Ce dernier a été tué par des soldats américains il y a plusieurs années.

L’Amérique sait qu’Oussama Ben Laden est mort le 13 décembre 2001. Après cette date, son nom a servi moins à unir l’Amérique qu’à la diviser, à piper les dés. Une fois le cas de Ben Laden réglé, nous aurions pu commencer la reconstruction d’une Nation légitime en Afghanistan, au lieu d’affronter une insurrection sans fin que nous avons nous-mêmes inventée.

Sans une politique intoxiquée par de fausses informations nous aurions pu apporter une solution diplomatique pour l’Afghanistan dès 2002, ce que nous nous refusons à faire encore aujourd’hui, et investir l’argent dans la reconstruction du pays. Cette dépense-là représente 5 cents sur un dollar, comparé à ce que nous dépensons dans une guerre contre un ennemi que nous avons nous-mêmes créé en exploitant son ignorance

Le mensonge concernant Ben Laden est un des actes les plus honteux jamais commis contre le peuple américain. Nous ne savons même pas s’il était vraiment notre ennemi. En tout cas, il n’a jamais été le personnage dépeint par Bush et Cheney. En fait, les familles Bush et Ben Laden ont toujours été proches, et cela, depuis des années.

Quel genre d’homme était Oussama Ben Laden ? L’allié des Américains contre la Russie, fils d’une riche famille saoudienne, il s’est rendu en Afghanistan pour aider les Afghans à défendre leur liberté. L’Amérique l’a alors célébré comme un héros. Les transcriptions des propos du véritable Ben Laden le montrent beaucoup plus modéré que nous le prétendons, fâché contre Israël et contre le gouvernement américain, mais n’affichant aucune colère envers les Américains et ne proférant aucune des menaces alléguées. Tout cela appartient au domaine public, pour qui souhaite s’informer.

Dans quelle mesure la tragédie de l’Amérique est-elle liée au destin de ces deux enfants de familles fortunées, longtemps liées par l’argent et l’amitié, les clans Bush et Ben Laden ?

L’un des deux fils est mort au milieu de montagnes éloignées de tout, l’autre vit dans une banlieue de Dallas espérant que personne ne soit envoyé pour venir le chercher. L’un est vétéran de combat, l’autre n’a jamais montré de courage si ce n’est depuis son confortable bureau sécurisé. L’Islam a pu voir en Ben Laden un grand leader. À présent on l’a pratiquement oublié.

Qu’a décidé l’Amérique à propos de Bush ?

Nous le savons : Ben Laden a toujours nié être impliqué dans les attentats du 11 Septembre pour lesquels en réalité il n’a jamais été inculpé. Non seulement quand il était encore en vie a-t-il nié y avoir participé, mais il l’a fait à quatre reprises, et en condamnant vigoureusement ceux qui ont perpétré ces attaques.

Cela est du ressort du domaine public, enfin public dans tous les pays sauf le nôtre. Au lieu de cela, nous avons fabriqué des films et payé des acteurs qui devaient ressembler plus ou moins à Ben Laden, lesquels acteurs ont contredit les déclarations connues de Ben Laden, jouant Ben Laden longtemps après sa mort.

Ces vidéos ont servi à justifier des budgets, des lois répressives, la torture et le vol pur et simple.

Pendant des années, nous avons reproché au gouvernement pakistanais de ne pas pourchasser un individu que tous savaient mort. Dès le 15 décembre 2001 au Pakistan, les journaux font état de sa mort. Comment pensez-vous que notre allié se soit senti alors qu’il se faisait continuellement tirer l’oreille après ses échecs répétés à capturer et à livrer quelqu’un qui n’existait plus ?

Quel effet pensez-vous que cela a pu avoir sur la crédibilité de l’Amérique au Pakistan et dans tout le monde musulman ? Étions-nous vus comme des criminels, des menteurs ou simplement comme des imbéciles ? Qu’est-ce qui vaut mieux ?

Cela aussi est une trahison.

Dans quelle mesure la mort de Ben Laden, la défaite et l’annihilation de la capacité de nuisance d’Al-Qaïda influeront-elles sur les évaluations du Renseignement, partiellement basées sur l’activité de Ben Laden, mais aussi d’Al-Qaïda en Irak qui non seulement n’a jamais existé, mais que l’on savait par ailleurs parfaitement impossible ?

Combien d’ »experts du Pentagone » sont coupables de ces crimes, tous ces officiers retraités qui ont vendu leur honneur en nous envoyant en guerre pour ce que l’on sait maintenant être un très sale tour de politique intérieure, sans rapport avec la sécurité nationale ?

Je ne suis pas toujours d’accord sur tout avec le Colonel Pappas. Je crois que son engagement politique a parfois tendance à obscurcir son jugement. Cependant, si nous sommes d’accord en ce qui concerne Ben Laden, nous ne le sommes pas sur ce que cela signifie. D’après moi, envoyer des hommes se faire tuer au front en se basant sur un mensonge est une trahison.

Falsifier des renseignements militaires secrets et dépenser des milliards de dollars pour des opérations militaires inutiles est une abomination. Pensez-y: c’est pure folie que de donner ces milliards pour des contrats à ses amis du Parti républicain afin d’aller remplir les caisses de campagne, et tout cela à partir de renseignements falsifiés. Cela s’est fait pendant des années.

Nous avons passé huit ans à poursuivre un mort, dépensant des milliards, envoyant des agents du FBI, de la C.I.A., des Forces spéciales de nageurs de combat de l’US Navy, des Unités de reconnaissance de la Navy, des Unités de Forces spéciales, dont beaucoup y ont laissé la vie, payant le prix d’une campagne politique visant à faire accepter l’explosion de la dette du pays, à enrichir une bande de copains du même bord et des profiteurs de guerre, et à faire applaudir une clique de fanfarons au Pentagone et leurs planqués de patrons à la Maison Blanche.

Combien de lois passées grâce à un mort ?


Combien de centaines de personnes torturées pour rechercher un mort ?


Combien de morts pour rechercher un mort ?


Combien de milliards dépensés à poursuivre un mort ?

Chaque fois que Bush, Cheney ou Rumsfeld se sont tenus devant des soldats et ont parlé de la traque du défunt Ben Laden, ce fut une honte, un déshonneur. Mentir aux hommes et aux femmes qui mettent leur vie en jeu n’est pas une plaisanterie.

Qui donc va répondre aux familles qui ont perdu un proche à cause de ces calculs politiques et financiers cachés derrière le prétexte de la traque de Ben Laden ?


traduit par C.Doure pour ReOpenNews


Note ReOpenNews : Gordon Duff est un ancien soldat des Marines, et désormais principal éditorialste sur le site Veterans Today :

http://www.veteranstoday.com

Source: http://www.reopen911.info 22 décembre, 2009

Url de cet article:

 http://www.internationalnews.fr/article-les-veterans-us-ben-laden-est-mort-en-decembre-2001-59811062.html

 Image de prévisualisation YouTube

 

Image de prévisualisation YouTube

 

Image de prévisualisation YouTube

Lire aussi:

Eric laurent: « ben laden n’a jamais revendiqué les attentats » (31′ 30)

Bhutto’s assassination: who gains? By f. Willam engdahl

Ambitions anglo-américaines derrière l’assassinat de bhutto

Pakistan: behind the assassination of benazir bhutto

The destabilization of pakistan, by michel chossudovsky

FOX News Report: Bin Laden Already Dead (dec 2001)

The Fake bin Laden Audio Tape

Benazir Bhutto says Osama is dead

(http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/osama_dead.php)

Telegraph, 12/28/2001

http://www.alterinfo.net/Oui-Oussama-Ben-Laden-est-Mort-mais-il-y-a-presque-dix-ans_a58244.html#last_comment

Dans la même rubrique:

< >

Lundi 2 Mai 2011 – 14:38 Après le certificat de naissance d’Obama, le certificat de décès d’Oussama!

Lundi 2 Mai 2011 – 11:19 Sale temps pour « l’Axe du Mal »


Regardez la photo du prétendu cadavre de Oussama Ben Laden… vive photoshop !

star_fstar_fstar_fstar_fstar_fNotez


 

Lundi 2 Mai 2011


Oussama Ben Laden  est Mort, oui mais il y a dix ans

Autres articles

Gordon Duff, un ancien Marine US parle de sa honte et du déshonneur qu’ont représenté pour lui, et représentent encore aujourd’hui, les continuelles évocations par Bush et maintenant par Obama, de l’ennemi public numéro un, Oussama Ben Laden. Il revient sur le gâchis innommable de cette guerre faite au nom d’un simulacre de chasse à l’homme, puisque les administrations américaines successives, les Services Secrets et tant d’autres personnes même bien moins informées savent depuis longtemps que ben Laden est mort en décembre 2001 après avoir toujours nié être l’organisateur des attentats du 11-Septembre.



Gordon DuffDes années de mensonge : les États-Unis reconnaissent ouvertement que Ben Laden est mort depuis longtemps.

par Gordon Duff, Veterans Today, le 5 décembre 2009

Ben Laden absent du rapport de McChrystal et du discours d’Obama: « La traque de ben Laden », une honte nationale.

Il y a des années que le commentateur conservateur, l’ancien Colonel de Marine Bob Pappas, explique que Ben Laden est mort à Tora Bora et que l’affirmation du Sénateur Kerry selon laquelle Ben Laden a pu fuir avec l’aide de Bush est un mensonge. Nous savons maintenant que Pappas voyait juste. Entendre la Secrétaire d’État Clinton lors de son passage au Pakistan parler de Ben Laden était terriblement embarrassant. Ben Laden est mort le 13 décembre 2001 et maintenant enfin, Obama, McChrystal, Cheney, et tous ceux qui ne sont pas complètement stupides finissent par avouer ce qu’ils savaient depuis des années.

Cependant, puisque nous avons perdu entre 200 et 300 hommes au sein de nos meilleures troupes d’opérations spéciales alors que nous savions Ben Laden mort, quelqu’un va-t-il pour autant passer derrière les barreaux ? Et vu que nous avons dépensé 200 millions de dollars pour ces « Special Ops » à la recherche d’un homme dont on savait qu’il était mort, qui donc ira en prison pour cela ? Bush, Rumsfeld et Cheney, pour des raisons que l’on sait maintenant d’ordre POLITIQUE, parlaient continuellement d’un homme qu’ils savaient décédé, mais qui ira en prison pour cela ? Pourquoi en 2004, des vidéos qui s’avérèrent contrefaites ont-elles été brandies comme des preuves issues du Renseignement pour faire basculer des élections [américaines] à l’issue incertaine ?  C’est un acte criminel, s’il en fut.
En 66 pages, le Général Stanley McChrystal ne mentionne pas une seule fois Oussama Ben Laden. Il n’y en a que pour « le Mollah Omar » à présent. Lors de son intervention à West Point, le Président Obama n’a jamais mentionné Oussama Ben Laden non plus. Pour le Colonel Pappas, c’est très clair : le vice-président Cheney « a laissé tomber » Ben Laden il y a longtemps. Ce dernier a été tué par des soldats américains il y a plusieurs années. 


L’Amérique sait qu’Oussama Ben Laden est mort le 13 décembre 2001. Après cette date, son nom a servi moins à unir l’Amérique qu’à la diviser, à piper les dés. Une fois le cas de Ben Laden réglé, nous aurions pu commencer la reconstruction d’une Nation légitime en Afghanistan, au lieu d’affronter une insurrection sans fin que nous avons nous-mêmes inventée.
Sans une politique intoxiquée par de fausses informations nous aurions pu apporter une solution diplomatique pour l’Afghanistan dès 2002, ce que nous nous refusons à faire encore aujourd’hui, et investir l’argent dans la reconstruction du pays. Cette dépense-là représente 5 cents sur un dollar, comparé à ce que nous dépensons dans une guerre contre un ennemi que nous avons nous-mêmes créé en exploitant son ignorance

Le mensonge concernant Ben Laden est un des actes les plus honteux jamais commis contre le peuple américain. Nous ne savons même pas s’il était vraiment notre ennemi. En tout cas, il n’a jamais été le personnage dépeint par Bush et Cheney. En fait, les familles Bush et Ben Laden ont toujours été proches, et cela, depuis des années.

Quel genre d’homme était Oussama Ben Laden ? L’allié des Américains contre la Russie, fils d’une riche famille saoudienne, il s’est rendu en Afghanistan pour aider les Afghans à défendre leur liberté. L’Amérique l’a alors célébré comme un héros. Les transcriptions des propos du véritable Ben Laden le montrent beaucoup plus modéré que nous le prétendons, fâché contre Israël et contre le gouvernement américain, mais n’affichant aucune colère envers les Américains et ne proférant aucune des menaces alléguées. Tout cela appartient au domaine public, pour qui souhaite s’informer.

Dans quelle mesure la tragédie de l’Amérique est-elle liée au destin de ces deux enfants de familles fortunées, longtemps liées par l’argent et l’amitié, les clans Bush et Ben Laden ?

L’un des deux fils est mort au milieu de montagnes éloignées de tout, l’autre vit dans une banlieue de Dallas espérant que personne ne soit envoyé pour venir le chercher. L’un est vétéran de combat, l’autre n’a jamais montré de courage si ce n’est depuis son confortable bureau sécurisé. L’Islam a pu voir en Ben Laden un grand leader. À présent on l’a pratiquement oublié.

Qu’a décidé l’Amérique à propos de Bush ?

Nous le savons : Ben Laden a toujours nié être impliqué dans les attentats du 11 Septembre pour lesquels en réalité il n’a jamais été inculpé. Non seulement quand il était encore en vie a-t-il nié y avoir participé, mais il l’a fait à quatre reprises, et en condamnant vigoureusement ceux qui ont perpétré ces attaques.

Cela est du ressort du domaine public, enfin public dans tous les pays sauf le nôtre. Au lieu de cela, nous avons fabriqué des films et payé des acteurs qui devaient ressembler plus ou moins à Ben Laden, lesquels acteurs ont contredit les déclarations connues de Ben Laden, jouant Ben Laden longtemps après sa mort.
Ces vidéos ont servi à justifier des budgets, des lois répressives, la torture et le vol pur et simple.
Pendant des années, nous avons reproché au gouvernement pakistanais de ne pas pourchasser un individu que tous savaient mort. Dès le 15 décembre 2001 au Pakistan, les journaux font état de sa mort. Comment pensez-vous que notre allié se soit senti alors qu’il se faisait continuellement tirer l’oreille après ses échecs répétés à capturer et à livrer quelqu’un qui n’existait plus ? 

Quel effet pensez-vous que cela a pu avoir sur la crédibilité de l’Amérique au Pakistan et dans tout le monde musulman ? Étions-nous vus comme des criminels, des menteurs ou simplement comme des imbéciles ? Qu’est-ce qui vaut mieux ?


Cela aussi est une trahison.

Dans quelle mesure la mort de Ben Laden, la défaite et l’annihilation de la capacité de nuisance d’Al-Qaïda influeront-elles sur les évaluations du Renseignement, partiellement basées sur l’activité de Ben Laden, mais aussi d’Al-Qaïda en Irak qui non seulement n’a jamais existé, mais que l’on savait par ailleurs parfaitement impossible ?

Combien d’ »experts du Pentagone » sont coupables de ces crimes, tous ces officiers retraités qui ont vendu leur honneur en nous envoyant en guerre pour ce que l’on sait maintenant être un très sale tour de politique intérieure, sans rapport avec la sécurité nationale ?
Je ne suis pas toujours d’accord sur tout avec le Colonel Pappas. Je crois que son engagement politique a parfois tendance à obscurcir son jugement. Cependant, si nous sommes d’accord en ce qui concerne Ben Laden, nous ne le sommes pas sur ce que cela signifie. D’après moi, envoyer des hommes se faire tuer au front en se basant sur un mensonge est une trahison.
Falsifier des renseignements militaires secrets et dépenser des milliards de dollars pour des opérations militaires inutiles est une abomination. Pensez-y: c’est pure folie que de donner ces milliards pour des contrats à ses amis du Parti républicain afin d’aller remplir les caisses de campagne, et tout cela à partir de renseignements falsifiés. Cela s’est fait pendant des années. 
Nous avons passé huit ans à poursuivre un mort, dépensant des milliards, envoyant des agents du FBI, de la C.I.A., des Forces spéciales de nageurs de combat de l’US Navy, des Unités de reconnaissance de la Navy, des Unités de Forces spéciales, dont beaucoup y ont laissé la vie, payant le prix d’une campagne politique visant à faire accepter l’explosion de la dette du pays, à enrichir une bande de copains du même bord et des profiteurs de guerre, et à faire applaudir une clique de fanfarons au Pentagone et leurs planqués de patrons à la Maison Blanche.

Combien de lois passées grâce à un mort ?
Combien de morts pour rechercher un mort ?
Combien de milliards dépensés à poursuivre un mort ?
Chaque fois que Bush, Cheney ou Rumsfeld se sont tenus devant des soldats et ont parlé de la traque du défunt Ben Laden, ce fut une honte, un déshonneur. Mentir aux hommes et aux femmes qui mettent leur vie en jeu n’est pas une plaisanterie.Qui donc va répondre aux familles qui ont perdu un proche à cause de ces calculs politiques et financiers cachés derrière le prétexte de la traque de Ben Laden ?

traduit par C.Doure pour ReOpenNews



Note ReOpenNews : Gordon Duff est un ancien soldat des Marines, et désormais principal éditorialste sur le site Veterans Today :http://www.veteranstoday.com

Source: http://www.reopen911.info 22 décembre, 2009

Url de cet article:
http://www.internationalnews.fr/article-les-veterans-us-ben-laden-est-mort-en-decembre-2001-59811062.htmlLire aussi:

Eric Laurent: « Ben Laden n’a jamais revendiqué les attentats » (31′ 30)The Death of bin Ladenism (New York Times 2002)

FOX News Report: Bin Laden Already Dead (dec 2001)

The Fake bin Laden Audio Tape

Benazir Bhutto says Osama is dead

Bhutto’s assassination: who gains? By f. Willam engdahl

Ambitions anglo-américaines derrière l’assassinat de bhutto

Pakistan: behind the assassination of benazir bhutto

The destabilization of pakistan, by michel chossudovsky

(http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/osama_dead.php)

Telegraph, 12/28/2001

En anglais:



Lundi 2 Mai 2011


Commentaires

Du plus récent au plus ancien | Du plus ancien au plus récent

59.Posté par dims le 03/05/2011 09:34

Ces guerres sont effectivement là pour enrichir l’industrie de l’armement qui est d’ailleurs l’une des rares industrie qui soit florissante aux USA. Cependant, cet argent est celui du contribuable Americain et ces guerres sont legitimés par des mensonges. L’administration Bush et maintenant l’administration Obama sont responsables de trahison envers le peuple Americain. Les alliés (France, GB Allemagne..) ne sont pas en restes et devrais repondre de leurs actes devant des juges.
Nous sommes dans une epoque vraiment bizzare ou le mensonge devient justice et ou la verité est passible de mort.
Le prophète Mohamed avait predit que cela arriverait.
Cependant, même si Ben laden est mort il y a de cela dix ans, ces scènes de liesse pour fêter la mort de quelqu’un et même si il s’agit d’hitler m’ont choqué…

La morale nous appele à la retenue et cela n’est pas digne des gens qui ont pu s’adonner à ce genre de spectacle…

L’imperialisme sous couvert de democratie, voilà l’ennemie du monde entier et même des americains et des Europeens qui sont certainement les peuples plus manipulés de la planete.

Le jour viendra ou ces gens seront jugés pour ces trahisons. Cependant, je ne pense pas que je sois encore là pour y assister.

Le mahdi fera son travail de grand nettoyage, inchallah, c’est pour bientôt.

58.Posté par Fran6 B. le 03/05/2011 09:05

Excellent article qui finira de convaincre les endormis :) je fais tourner !

Pour le coup c’est là que l’on se rend compte que les médias valent toutes les armes nucléaires du monde.

57.Posté par soravardi le 03/05/2011 02:19

Quand les yankees ont arrêtés saddam hussein ,ils ne se sont pas gênés pour l’exiber devant les caméras du monde entier comme preuve de leur supériorité,aujourd’hui ils nous montre une photos complétement traffiquer de leur ennemis jurés et nous sommes censés les croires .Jusqu’ou iront-ils dans le mensonge ?Aprés cette fausse mort annoncée qu’est ce que ces psychopates de la maison blanche préparent comme autre plan diabolique.

http://les7duquebec.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/mission-impossible-attraper-le-defunt-bin-laden/

56.Posté par Intellecterroriste le 03/05/2011 01:56

@ Nizar MAURANGES

Lisez l’article du monde! « Un de ses femmes est morte pendant le raid »!

normal, il est « musulman », donc sans foi ni loi!

@ Ange, c’est un photomontage, basta!

D’ailleurs, merci au bonhomme qui a fait le montage photo du photo-montage de supprimer son « photoshop » à la mord-moi-l-noeud.

on peut AUSSI le faire avec GIMP, logiciel gratuit et LIBRE! Au moins aussi puissant que le logiciel propriétaire de chez AdobE

Amicalement

55.Posté par dedelasardine le 02/05/2011 23:55

cette show servirat pour les prochains attentats terroristes de part le monde cela sera plus plausible pour le citoyen lambda.et oui vengance la menace terrorriste est encore plus presente meme sans ben laden il fallait lui trouver une fin il ont ote pour cette solution.il devenait evident que ben laden pour la masse

54.Posté par Nizar MAURANGES le 02/05/2011 23:05

ça passe en boucle, « BEN LADEN s’est servi d’une femme comme bouclier humain pendant le raid » ou « Le commando n’a pas fait de prisonniers » ou « Le commando pouvait ramener Ben LADEN vivant »….Un vrai ramassis de mensonges, ils ne se rendent pas compte qu’ils se ridiculisent complètement. Le pire, c’est le ministre Turc qui félicite, Karzaï et pleins d’autres, on a l’impression que chacun se doit de féliciter Obama, autrement, ils auront droit à une réplique…genre bombardement.
Mais comment peuvent ils être dupes à ce point. Les soubrettes battent leur plein, c’est écoeurant!
Si toutes ces manifestations se faisaient pour arrêter la guerre contre la Libye, ça sera mieux, mais là, mutisme complet, on laisse et regarde faire par peur, de vrais lâches!

53.Posté par ange le 02/05/2011 22:20

« est fondée » . Il y a aussi peut-être des raisons de gros sous, de pouvoir etc Bienvenue dans le nouvel ordre mondial . Vous disparaissez quand c’est le mieux opportun pour redistribuer vos biens !

52.Posté par ange le 02/05/2011 22:17

Anita1945, alors pourquoi n’ont-ils pas pris de photo de BL mort ? Normalement, il est toujours d’usage de prendre des photos après la mort d’une personnalité quel que soit son état et même de tout mort dans toute enquête policière ou dans toute constatation légale . La famille n’ayant pas la preuve est fondé de refuser le décès et de demander la constatation en « disparition » au pire , volontaire ou non volontaire . A moins qu’il y ait des biens ou des prise de pouvoir dans des sociétés financières en cause ayant appartenu à cette personne si elle n’en a pas été dépossédée ?

51.Posté par ange le 02/05/2011 22:07

L’expression du visage est tellement identique sur les deux photos qu’on dirait une représentation de cire comme il s’en fait maintenant pour les célébrités . la barbe est redevenue à quelques poils grisonnantes alors qu’on nous avait montré une barbe bien noire sur une autre « intervention » du dit personnage . Peut-être a-t’il utilisé un « détachant « pour la barbe ou un shampooing spécifique par revenir au blanc ? Pour les commentaires de ce vétéran, hélas , il a bien raison : ces aventures guerrières ont ruiné l’Amérique tandis qu’elles enrichissaient des fortunes privées .

YEARS OF DECEIT: US OPENLY ACCEPTS BIN LADEN LONG DEAD

summary_noimg = 800; summary_img = 500; img_thumb_height = 250; img_thumb_width = 610; // »)!=-1){ s[i] = s[i].substring(s[i].indexOf(« > »)+1,s[i].length); } } strx = s.join(«  »); } chop = (chop =1) { imgtag = ‘‘; summ = summary_img; } var summary = imgtag + ‘

‘ + removeHtmlTag(div.innerHTML,summ) +’

‘; div.innerHTML = summary; } //]]>

Gordon DuffVeterans Today

osama_bin_laden_dead0001_1

Bin laden never mentioned in
Mcchrystal report or Obama speech
« Hunt for bin laden” a national shame

Conservative commentator, former Marine Colonel Bob Pappas has been saying for years that bin Laden died at Tora Bora and that Senator Kerry’s claim that bin Laden escaped with Bush help was a lie. Now we know that Pappas was correct. The embarrassment of having Secretary of State Clinton talk about bin Laden in Pakistan was horrific. He has been dead since December 13, 2001 and now, finally, everyone, Obama, McChrystal, Cheney, everyone who isn’t nuts is finally saying what they have known for years.
However, since we lost a couple of hundred of our top special operations forces hunting for bin Laden after we knew he was dead, is someone going to answer for this with some jail time? Since we spent 200 million dollars on “special ops” looking for someone we knew was dead, who is going to jail for that? Since Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheney continually talked about a man they knew was dead, now known to be for reasons of POLITICAL nature, who is going to jail for that? Why were tapes brought out, now known to be forged, as legitimate intelligence to sway the disputed 2004 election in the US? This is a criminal act if there ever was one.
In 66 pages, General Stanley McChrystal never mentions Osama bin Laden. Everything is “Mullah Omar”now. In his talk at West Point, President Obama never mentioned Osama bin Laden. Col. Pappas makes it clear, Vice President Cheney let it “out of the bag” long ago. Bin Laden was killed by American troops many many years ago.
America knew Osama bin Laden died December 13, 2001. After that, his use was hardly one to unite America but rather one to divide, scam and play games. With bin Laden gone, we could have started legitimate nation building in Afghanistan instead of the eternal insurgency that we invented ourselves.
Without our ill informed policies, we could have had a brought diplomatic solution in 2002 in Afghanistan, the one we are ignoring now, and spent money rebuilding the country, 5 cents on the dollar compared to what we are spending fighting a war against an enemy we ourselves recruited thru ignorance.
The bin Laden scam is one of the most shameful acts ever perpetrated against the American people. We don’t even know if he really was an enemy, certainly he was never the person that Bush and Cheney said. In fact, the Bush and bin Laden families were always close friends and had been for many years.
What kind of man was Osama bin Laden? This one time American ally against Russia, son of a wealthy Saudi family, went to Afghanistan to help them fight for their freedom. America saw him as a great hero then. Transcripts of the real bin Laden show him to be much more moderate than we claim, angry at Israel and the US government but showing no anger toward Americans and never making the kind of theats claimed. All of this is public record for any with the will to learn.
How much of America’s tragedy is tied with these two children of the rich, children of families long joined thru money and friendship, the Bush and bin Laden clans.
One son died in remote mountains, another lives in a Dallas suburb hoping nobody is sent after him. One is a combat veteran, one never took a strong stand unless done from safety and comfort. Islam once saw bin Laden as a great leader. Now he is mostly forgotten.
What has America decided about Bush?
We know this: Bin Laden always denied any ties to 9/11 and, in fact, has never been charged in relation to 9/11. He not only denied involvement, but had done so, while alive, 4 times and had vigorously condemned those who were involved in the attack.
This is on the public record, public in every free country except ours. We, instead, showed films made by paid actors, made up to look somewhat similar to bin Laden, actors who contradicted bin Ladens very public statements, actors pretending to be bin Laden long after bin Laden’s death.
These were done to help justify spending, repressive laws, torture and simple thievery.
For years, we attacked the government of Pakistan for not hunting down someone everyone knew was dead. Bin Laden’s death hit the newspapers in Pakistan on December 15, 2001. How do you think our ally felt when they were continually berated for failing to hunt down and turn over someone who didn’t exist?
What do you think this did for American credibility in Pakistan and thru the Islamic world? Were we seen as criminals, liars or simply fools? Which one is best?
This is also treason.
How does the death of bin Laden and the defeat and dismemberment of Al Qaeda impact the intelligence assessments, partially based on, not only bin Laden but Al Qaeda activity in Iraq that,not only never happened but was now known to have been unable to happen?
How many “Pentagon Pundits,” the retired officers who sold their honor to send us to war for what is now known to be domestic political dirty tricks and not national security are culpable in these crimes?
I don’t always agree with Col. Pappas on things. I believe his politics overrule his judgement at times. However, we totally agree on bin Laden, simply disagree with what it means. To me lying and sending men to their deaths based on lies is treason.
Falsifying military intelligence and spending billions on unnecessary military operations for political reasons is an abomination. Consider this, giving billions in contracts to GOP friends who fill campaign coffers, and doing so based on falsified intelligence is insane. This was done for years.
We spent 8 years chasing a dead man, spending billions, sending FBI agents, the CIA, Navy Seals, Marine Force Recon, Special Forces, many to their deaths, as part of a political campaign to justify running American into debt, enriching a pack of political cronies and war profiteers and to puff up a pack of Pentagon peacocks and their White house draft dodging bosses.
How many laws were pushed thru because of a dead man?
How many hundreds were tortured to find a dead man?
How many hundreds died looking for a dead man?
How many billions were spent looking for a dead man?
Every time Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld stood before troops and talked about hunting down the dead bin Laden, it was a dishonor. Lying to men and women who put their lives on the line is not a joke.
Who is going to answer to the families of those who died for the politics and profit tied to the Hunt for Bin Laden?

___________________________________________________________________________________
Veterans Today Senior Editor Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran and regular contributor on political and social issues.

Probe into ‘Bin Laden death’ leakhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/5374160.stm« President Jacques Chirac has ordered an inquiry into the leak of a French secret service memo claiming that Osama Bin Laden had died. »
Benazir Bhutto Confirms that Osama Bin Laden is Dead (Video)http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8120236576648647371« In an interview only months before her death, Bhutto, possibly unintentionally, admitted that Bin Laden had been killed. She refers to someone as « the man who killed Osama Bin Laden »"
Bin Laden may be dead, but living on through old sound biteshttp://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2008/me_terror_02_11.asp« U.S. intelligence agencies are beginning to suspect that Al Qaida leader Osama Bin Laden is dead after all, despite a recent audio tape exhorting Al Qaida terrorists in Iraq. »


Israeli intelligence: Bin Laden is dead, heir has been chosenhttp://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2002/me_terrorism_10_16.html« Osama Bin Laden appears to be dead but his colleagues have decided that Al Qaida and its insurgency campaign against the United States will continue, Israeli intelligence sources said. »
Osama bin Laden: A dead nemesis perpetuated by the US governmenthttp://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/osama_dead.html« Osama bin Laden is dead. The news first came from sources in Afghanistan and Pakistan almost six months ago: the fugitive died in December [2001] and was buried in the mountains of southeast Afghanistan. Pakistan’s president, Pervez Musharraf, echoed the information. The remnants of Osama’s gang, however, have mostly stayed silent, either to keep Osama’s ghost alive or because they have no means of communication. »
If bin Laden was dead, Would the U.S. admit it? http://www.welfarestate.com/binladen/funeral/
Report: Bin Laden Already Deadhttp://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,41576,00.html« Usama bin Laden has died a peaceful death due to an untreated lung complication, the Pakistan Observer reported, citing a Taliban leader who allegedly attended the funeral of the Al Qaeda leader. »

___________________________________________________________________________________
URL: http://www.a-w-i-p.com/index.php/2010/11/03/years-of-deceit-us-openly-accepts-bin-la

Une pause café - Une person... |
LE TECHNICIEN DU RISQUE |
Sauvons les animaux |
Unblog.fr | Créer un blog | Annuaire | Signaler un abus | Vues de Babi
| Mouvement Citoyen Chrétien
| CRC-PHONE IMPACT EXPERT